Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude Opus 5.5vsGrok 4.1 Fast
Updated Sep 2026

Claude Opus 5.5vsGrok 4.1 Fast

Claude Opus 5.5 is the newer model, released after Grok 4.1 Fast.

Claude Opus 5.5 and Grok 4.1 Fast compared across 19 shared prompts
SpecClaude Opus 5.5Grok 4.1 Fast
Input price$4/M tokens—
Output price$20/M tokens—
Context window1.0M tokens—
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Nov 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 19 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Claude Opus 5.5900 words
HarborTech Services: 5-Year LBO Underwriting Conventions: $m. Interest is charged on beginning-of-year balances, which avoids circularity. Term Loan (TL) amortization is 1% of the original $480m, or $4.8m per year. Mezz PIK accrues to principal. All FCF after mandatory debt service sweeps to the TL.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.1 Fast385 words
Simplified LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030, $m) Year Revenue EBITDA TL Cash Int. Mezz Cash Int. Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF After Debt Service* End TL End Mezz End Total Debt FY26 972.0 136.1 43.2 21.6 17.8 29.2 0.4 19.1 456.1 183.6 639.7 FY27 1,040.0 156.0 41.1 22.0 23.2 31.2 0.3 33.6 417.9 187.3 605.2 FY28 1,102.4 176.4 37.6…
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Claude Opus 5.53,435 words
The Transistor in 1920: A Counterfactual Through 1980 First, a Reality Check on the Premise A transistor "invented" in 1920 would not have changed the world in 1920. The actual 1947 transistor rested on three foundations that did not exist yet: Quantum theory of solids.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.1 Fast922 words
Technological Implications Immediate Advancements (1920s-1930s): Transistors replace bulky, power-hungry vacuum tubes by mid-1920s. Radios become pocket-sized and cheap by 1925 (vs. 1954 historically), accelerating mass media.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Claude Opus 5.54,420 words
Contractor-Side Review of the Software Consulting Agreement Overall assessment: This agreement is heavily one-sided. Nearly every clause shifts risk, cost, or control to the Contractor, and several provisions interact to create compounding exposure.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.1 Fast1,106 words
Analysis of Exploitable Clauses Below, I identify all nine clauses as potentially exploitable against the Contractor, explain the risks (how they could be abused), propose specific modifications to make the contract more balanced, and provide legal reasoning grounded in general principles of U.S.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Claude Opus 5.5300 words
Midnight Silk Noodles Creamy, tangy peanut noodles with a gentle kick, ready faster than takeout. Serves: 2 Prep time: 5 minutes Cook time: 10 minutes Total time: 15 minutes The 7 Ingredients 8 oz (225 g) spaghetti (or any long noodle) ¼ cup creamy peanut butter 3 tablespoons soy sauce 1 tablespoon honey (or sugar) 1…
Read the full answer
Grok 4.1 Fast208 words
Pantry Raid Garlic Tomato Pasta A savory, garlicky one-pan wonder that's ready in under 20 minutes—perfect for when hunger strikes and the fridge is empty! Serves: 2 Prep time: 5 minutes Cook time: 12 minutes Total time: 17 minutes Ingredients (exactly 7 common pantry staples): 200g spaghetti or any pasta (2 handfuls)…
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Claude Opus 5.51,442 words
How Large Language Models Work: Three Explanations For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM as a single, very large pure function: f(tokens[0..n]) → probability distribution over tokens[n+1]. Text is chunked into tokens (roughly word fragments, from a vocabulary of about 100k).
Read the full answer
Grok 4.1 Fast874 words
Explanation for the Experienced Software Engineer Think of a large language model (LLM) like GPT as an enormous, distributed autocomplete engine built on a transformer architecture—imagine a system where every API endpoint you've ever queried is distilled into a single, massively parallelizable service that handles…
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Claude Opus 5.53,099 words
The 90-Day Longevity & Performance Protocol A structured, measurable plan for the experienced biohacker How to Use This Plan Philosophy: Measure → Intervene → Re-measure. Every intervention has a hypothesis, a metric, and a decision rule.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.1 Fast659 words
Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Biohacking Plan Introduction and Assumptions This plan is designed for an advanced biohacker (healthy adult, age 30-50, no major medical conditions) aiming to optimize longevity markers (e.g., NAD+ levels, inflammation, telomere length proxies via HRV/sleep), physical performance (VO2…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5
Grok 4.1 Fast
Grok 4.1 Fast

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 5.5
Input
$4.00
Output
$20.00
Grok 4.1 Fast
Input
—
Output
—
Where to run it

4 hosts

Claude Opus 5.54 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Amazon Bedrock$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·99.8% upAzure AI Foundry$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·100% upAnthropic$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·100% upGoogle Vertex AI$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·100% up
Grok 4.1 Fast

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic while Grok 4.1 Fast is developed by xAI. You can compare their actual outputs across 19 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 5.5 and Grok 4.1 Fast each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 19 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 5.5 and Grok 4.1 Fast across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Claude Opus 5.5 logoSolar Mini 4 logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.1 Fast logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Grok 4.1 Fast vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.1 Fast logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Grok 4.1 Fast vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 logoCommand A+ logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.1 Fast logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
Grok 4.1 Fast vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.1 Fast logoGPT-6 Luna logo
Grok 4.1 Fast vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Claude Opus 5.5 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6Same lab
Claude Opus 5.5 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1Same lab
Grok 4.1 Fast logoGrok 4.7 logo
Grok 4.1 Fast vs Grok 4.7Same lab
Grok 4.1 Fast logoGrok 4.6 logo
Grok 4.1 Fast vs Grok 4.6Same lab
Claude Opus 5.5 logoHorizon Beta logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Horizon BetaSame size
Claude Opus 5.5 logoHunter Alpha logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Hunter AlphaNew provider
Claude Opus 5.5 logoHy3 logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Hy3New provider
Claude Opus 5.5 logoHy4 Preview logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Hy4 PreviewNew provider

Model pages

Claude Opus 5.5 logo
Claude Opus 5.519 outputs, specs and price
Grok 4.1 Fast logo
Grok 4.1 Fast59 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed