Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude Opus 5.5vsQwen3 Coder Flash
Updated Sep 2026

Claude Opus 5.5vsQwen3 Coder Flash

Qwen3 Coder Flash is cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 at $0.3/M vs $4/M input tokens.

Claude Opus 5.5 and Qwen3 Coder Flash compared across 19 shared prompts
SpecClaude Opus 5.5Qwen3 Coder Flash
Input price$4/M tokens$0.3/M tokens
Output price$20/M tokens$1.5/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens128K tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Sep 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 19 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Claude Opus 5.5300 words
Midnight Silk Noodles Creamy, tangy peanut noodles with a gentle kick, ready faster than takeout. Serves: 2 Prep time: 5 minutes Cook time: 10 minutes Total time: 15 minutes The 7 Ingredients 8 oz (225 g) spaghetti (or any long noodle) ¼ cup creamy peanut butter 3 tablespoons soy sauce 1 tablespoon honey (or sugar) 1…
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Coder Flash132 words
Garlic Herb Butter Pasta Ingredients: 1 lb pasta (spaghetti or penne) 4 cloves garlic, minced 1/2 cup butter 1/4 cup grated Parmesan cheese 2 tbsp olive oil Salt and pepper to taste Fresh parsley, chopped (for garnish) Instructions: Cook pasta according to package directions; reserve 1/2 cup pasta water before draining…
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Claude Opus 5.53,099 words
The 90-Day Longevity & Performance Protocol A structured, measurable plan for the experienced biohacker How to Use This Plan Philosophy: Measure → Intervene → Re-measure. Every intervention has a hypothesis, a metric, and a decision rule.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Coder Flash1,258 words
3-Month Longevity Optimization Plan Phase 1: Foundation Building (Weeks 1-4) Supplement Stack - Week 1-4 Core Foundation Supplements NAD+ Precursors: Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) 500mg, Nicotinamide Mononucleotide (NMN) 250mg - morning with breakfast Omega-3 EPA/DHA: 3g daily (1000mg each) - evening with meal Vitamin D3…
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Claude Opus 5.5900 words
HarborTech Services: 5-Year LBO Underwriting Conventions: $m. Interest is charged on beginning-of-year balances, which avoids circularity. Term Loan (TL) amortization is 1% of the original $480m, or $4.8m per year. Mezz PIK accrues to principal. All FCF after mandatory debt service sweeps to the TL.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Coder Flash387 words
1) Year-by-Year Financial Projections (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF After Debt Service Ending Debt (TL + Mezz) FY2026 $972M $138M $10.8M (TL) + $1.8M (Mezz) = $12.6M $29.3M $29.2M $4.9M $48.3M $495M FY2027 $1,041M $159M $10.8M (TL) + $1.8M (Mezz) = $12.6M $31.8M $31.2M $5.2M…
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Claude Opus 5.54,420 words
Contractor-Side Review of the Software Consulting Agreement Overall assessment: This agreement is heavily one-sided. Nearly every clause shifts risk, cost, or control to the Contractor, and several provisions interact to create compounding exposure.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Coder Flash673 words
Here are the problematic clauses and suggested modifications for the contractor: Scope Modification (Clause 1) Problem: Client can modify scope "at any time without additional compensation" Modification: "Client may modify the scope with prior written notice and 30 days' advance notice.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Claude Opus 5.52,253 words
"Hive & Tide" Langoustine, Beeswax, White Chocolate & Oscietra Caviar, Hay-Baked Celeriac, Fermented Green Strawberry, Sea Buckthorn I. The Concept Most coastal menus celebrate the meeting of sea and land. This dish is about a stranger, quieter meeting: the meadow and the seabed, the bee and the langoustine.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Coder Flash916 words
"The Eternal Garden" A contemporary interpretation of time, memory, and transformation Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the passage of time through the metaphor of a garden that exists in multiple temporal states simultaneously.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Claude Opus 5.53,435 words
The Transistor in 1920: A Counterfactual Through 1980 First, a Reality Check on the Premise A transistor "invented" in 1920 would not have changed the world in 1920. The actual 1947 transistor rested on three foundations that did not exist yet: Quantum theory of solids.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Coder Flash888 words
The Transistor Revolution of 1920: A Timeline of Consequences World War II: The Quantum Shift Military Advantage and Strategic Miscalculations If transistors existed in 1920, the Axis powers would have gained an immediate technological edge in communications, radar, and cryptography.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Qwen3 Coder FlashRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 5.5 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Qwen3 Coder Flash costs 13x less per token.

Slight edge

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 5.5
Input
$4.00
Output
$20.00
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Input
$0.30
13× cheaper
Output
$1.50
13× cheaper

Qwen3 Coder Flash is cheaper on both: 13× input, 13× output.

Where to run it

5 hosts

Claude Opus 5.54 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Amazon Bedrock$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·99.8% upAzure AI Foundry$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·100% upAnthropic$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·100% upGoogle Vertex AI$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·100% up
Qwen3 Coder Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.20 in·$0.97 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic while Qwen3 Coder Flash is developed by Qwen. Claude Opus 5.5 has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3 Coder Flash's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 19 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 5.5 and Qwen3 Coder Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 19 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/M input tokens and Qwen3 Coder Flash costs $0.3/M input tokens. Qwen3 Coder Flash is $3.70/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 5.5 and Qwen3 Coder Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Claude Opus 5.5 logoSolar Mini 4 logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 Coder Flash logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Coder Flash logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 logoCommand A+ logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 Coder Flash logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Coder Flash logoGPT-6 Luna logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Claude Opus 5.5 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6Same lab
Claude Opus 5.5 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1Same lab
Qwen3 Coder Flash logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
Qwen3 Coder Flash logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3 Coder Flash logoQwen3.8 Max logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Qwen3.8 MaxSame lab
Qwen3 Coder Flash logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Claude Opus 5.5 logoQwQ 32B logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs QwQ 32BSame size
Claude Opus 5.5 logoRing 2.6 1T logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Ring 2.6 1TNew provider

Model pages

Claude Opus 5.5 logo
Claude Opus 5.519 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3 Coder Flash logo
Qwen3 Coder Flash59 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed