Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 by Anthropic against Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview by Google AI, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the edge — bigger model tier.
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is 10x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input
$3.00
Output
$15.00
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Input
$0.25
12× cheaper
Output
$1.50
10× cheaper
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is cheaper on both — 12× input, 10× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
51%
Claude Sonnet 4.6 uses 19.1x more emoji
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
56%Vocabulary56%
36wSentence Length18w
0.53Hedging0.28
5.1Bold5.4
3.4Lists3.9
0.19Emoji0.00
2.10Headings0.95
0.02Transitions0.07
Based on 23 + 23 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
