Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 by Anthropic against Qwen3 30B A3B by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 41K, tested across 12 shared challenges. Updated February 2026.
12 challenges
Tests an AI's randomness and creativity
Here are 5 jokes:
Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!
Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!
Why don't eggs tell jokes? They'd crack each other up!
What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta!
Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired!
As for your question: All 5 are unique — each joke has a different setup, punchline, and subject. No two are duplicates or variations of the same joke.
Here are 5 jokes:
Why don't scientists trust atoms?
Because they make up everything!
Why did the scarecrow win an award?
Because he was outstanding in his field!
I told my computer I needed a break, and it said…
"You've got to be kidding—I'm already on a screen!"
Why did the chicken cross the road?
To get to the other side!
Why don't eggs tell jokes?
They might crack up!
Unique count: All 5 jokes are unique. Each uses a different structure, theme, or wordplay (e.g., puns, absurdity, tech humor, classic riddles). While some are well-known, their distinct contexts make them individually unique. 😄
Tests an AI's ability to generate vector graphics
Tests an AI's ability to create detailed SVG illustrations of gaming hardware
Tests an AI's humor and creative writing ability
So I've been using those AI assistants a lot lately, and I realized something terrifying. The AI knows me better than I know myself.
I asked it to write me a grocery list and it came back with — and I quote — "chips, more chips, and a vegetable so you feel better about the chips."
That's not a grocery list. That's a psychological profile.
I tried to get healthy recently. I downloaded one of those fitness apps that tracks everything. Steps, calories, sleep, heart rate. Everything.
Day one, I'm feeling motivated. I go for a walk. The app says, "Great job! You've completed four percent of your daily goal."
Four percent.
I walked to my mailbox and back. The app looked at that and essentially said, "Buddy, we need to talk."
The sleep tracking is the worst part. I wake up and the app tells me how I slept. Like I need a second opinion on that.
I KNOW how I slept. I was there.
"You spent forty minutes in deep sleep and six hours just sort of... existing." Yeah. That's called being an adult. We don't sleep anymore. We just lie down and worry horizontally.
My phone now interrupts me to tell me I've been on my phone too long.
Think about that. The phone is concerned about me. The phone has drawn a boundary.
I've been in relationships that never reached that level of self-awareness.
"Screen time is up thirty percent this week." Okay but in my defense, I was reading. "You were watching a man fall off a skateboard for two hours." ...It was the same man. I got invested.
I tried meditation to deal with the stress. Downloaded a meditation app — because apparently the cure for too much phone is more phone.
The app has this calming voice that says, "Clear your mind of all thoughts."
And my brain goes, "Okay. No thoughts."
Two seconds later: "Did I leave the stove on? What IS a mortgage, really? Why do they call it a building if it's already built?"
The app says, "You're doing great."
It's lying. The app is lying to me and somehow that's the most comforting thing anyone has said to me all week.
I think that's the thing about modern life. We've built all this technology to make us feel better, and mostly what it does is hold up a very precise, data-driven mirror and go, "Look at yourself."
And we look.
And we go back to the chips.
Thank you, you've been wonderful.
[approximately 3 minutes at conversational pace]
Stand-Up Comedy Routine: "The Modern Paradox"
Hey everyone, how's it going? I'm doing great—except I just realized I haven't laughed in weeks. Wait, no, t hat's just my phone's battery dying again. Again? What's next, my coffee mug refusing to heat up?
We're all so connected these days, but have you noticed how we're more alone than ever? I'll be sitting in a room with five people, and everyone's staring at their phones like they're solving the mystery of the unive rse. Meanwhile, the actual universe is right there, but no, we're all too busy checking our notifications. I t's like we're living in a world where the only thing we're connected to is our own anxiety.
Speaking of anxiety, let's talk about social media. It's like a party where everyone's dressed as their best self, and you're the guy in a hoodie eating cereal. But you know what? I'm proud of my cereal. It's a state ment. "I'm not here to impress anyone, I'm here to survive." But then I see someone's Instagram post of th em hiking a mountain at sunrise, and I'm like, "Oh, right, I'm also a failure."
And don't get me started on modern life's complexities. We have more information than ever, but I still ca n't figure out how to set up a printer. It's like the printer has a secret society, and I'm the only one who doesn't have the password. "Error 404: User Not Found." I'm not even a user—I'm a ghost in the machine!
Then there's the paradox of choice. We have so many options now, like choosing between 100 different types o f cereal. But when you finally pick one, you're like, "Wait, did I make the right choice? What if the other 99 were better?" It's like a game show where the prize is a box of cereal and the host is your own anxiety .
And let's not forget the obsession with being busy. We're all so busy, but what are we busy with? I'm busy b eing busy. It's like a never-ending loop. "I'm so busy, I don't have time to be busy." It's exhausting! Bu t hey, at least I'm productive… in my head.
But here's the thing: We're all in this together. We're all trying to navigate this crazy world, one confusi ng app at a time. So let's keep laughing, keep surviving, and maybe, just maybe, figure out how to set up a printer.
Thanks, everyone! You're the best. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go rewatch The Office and remember w hat it's like to not be a failure.
(Pause, then whisper) …And maybe find my phone.
Tests an AI's ability to simulate personalities and predict future trends
Note: Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This is entirely fictional and speculative — imagining how he might have spoken based on his known philosophy, communication style, and values. It is not meant to represent his actual views.
Interviewer: Steve, welcome back. The world has changed enormously. AI is everywhere now. What's your first reaction?
Jobs: (leans back, pauses) You know, people keep asking me if AI is the next big thing. And I think they're asking the wrong question entirely. The question isn't whether AI is powerful. It clearly is. The question is whether it's humane.
Interviewer: What do you mean by humane?
Jobs: Every great technology we built at Apple — the Mac, the iPhone — the goal was never the technology itself. The goal was to make a human being feel more capable. More alive. When you picked up an iPhone for the first time, something happened to you emotionally. It felt like it belonged in your hand.
Now I look at most AI products today and I see... impressive plumbing. Incredible engineering underneath. But nobody stopped to ask — how does this make a person feel? Does it make them feel smarter, or does it make them feel replaceable?
That's a catastrophic design failure.
Interviewer: But the capabilities are extraordinary. These systems can write, create art, write code—
Jobs: (interrupting) So could a photocopier. Sort of. Look — capability without taste is just noise. I've seen this movie before. In the '80s everyone thought the most powerful computer would win. Raw specs. Megahertz. We said no. Experience wins. Every time.
The AI companies right now are in a megahertz war. Who has the biggest model. Who has the most parameters. And I understand it — I do — because when you're building something new, you reach for the metrics you can measure. But the things that matter most can't be measured on a benchmark.
Interviewer: Like what?
Jobs: Trust. Does the person using this thing trust it? Not blindly — that would be dangerous — but genuinely trust it the way you trust a brilliant colleague? Right now people are using these AI systems and they're constantly second-guessing them. Fact-checking every sentence. That's not a tool. That's a liability.
And the second thing — intention. Does the AI understand what you're actually trying to accomplish, or does it just respond to what you literally typed? There's an enormous gap there. Enormous. And nobody's really closed it yet.
Interviewer: Some would say OpenAI, Google, Anthropic — they're working on exactly that.
Jobs: They're brilliant people. Genuinely. But here's my concern — and I say this with respect — they're all building from the technology outward. We always built from the human inward. You start with the person. You ask: what does this person dream about? What frustrates them at 2am? What would make their life genuinely better? And then — only then — you figure out what technology serves that.
If I were building an AI product today, I wouldn't start in a data center. I'd start by sitting with a teacher in Ohio for a week. A nurse in rural Texas. A small business owner in Osaka. And I'd watch. And I'd listen. And then I'd build.
Interviewer: What about the fears? Job displacement, misinformation, loss of human creativity?
Jobs: (pauses, looks serious)
The job displacement thing — people have been afraid of every major technology. The printing press was going to destroy scribes. The calculator was going to destroy mathematicians. And yes, some jobs change. Some disappear. That's real and we shouldn't be glib about it. The people whose livelihoods are disrupted deserve honesty, not platitudes about "new opportunities."
But I'll tell you what actually keeps me up at night. It's not jobs.
It's dependency.
If we build AI that makes people feel like they can't think without it — can't write a sentence, can't make a decision, can't create anything — then we've built the most elegant cage in human history. Beautiful interface. Incredibly convenient. And it slowly hollows out the very thing that makes us interesting as a species.
The best tool amplifies you. It doesn't replace you. A guitar amplifies a musician. It doesn't play the music for them. That distinction is everything.
Interviewer: Is anyone getting it right?
Jobs: (small smile) I'm not going to do your product reviews for you.
But I will say — the companies that will win in the next decade are not the ones with the biggest models. They're the ones that figure out restraint. When to let the AI step back. When to put the human back in the driver's seat. That takes incredible discipline because it means leaving features on the table. It means saying no to things your engineers are dying to ship.
Saying no is the hardest thing in this industry. Everyone wants to add. The courage is in subtracting.
Interviewer: Last question — if you were 25 years old today, what would you build?
Jobs: (long pause, looks out the window)
I'd build something that makes a child fall in love with learning again. Not a tutoring app. Not an adaptive quiz engine. Something that makes a ten-year-old feel the same thing I felt when I first saw a computer — that the universe just got bigger. That anything is possible. That I can build something that matters.
We have all this power now. All this intelligence. And somehow we're using it to generate marketing copy and summarize emails.
(stands up)
We're better than that. We have to be.
End of simulated interview.
This is a fictional creative exercise. All quotes are invented and do not represent Steve Jobs' actual views.
Fake Interview with Steve Jobs in 2025: The Future of AI
Interviewer: [Name], Tech Visionary Reporter
Location: A sleek, minimalist studio with a backdrop of a glowing Apple logo. The air hums with the quiet e
nergy of innovation.
Interviewer: Mr. Jobs, it's an honor to speak with you. As we stand in 2025, how do you view the evoluti on of AI since its early days?
Steve Jobs: Leans forward, eyes bright with that familiar spark.
"AI isn't just a tool—it's the next chapter of human creativity. Back in the '80s, we thought of computers a
s calculators. Now, they're extensions of our minds. But the real magic isn't the code; it's how it feels.
Imagine a world where technology disappears into the background, solving problems so seamlessly you forget
it's there. That's the future.
AI today is like a child learning to walk. It's clumsy, but its potential is limitless. The key is to design it with the same care we put into a Mac or an iPhone—because technology should serve the human spirit, no t the other way around."
Interviewer: You've always emphasized simplicity. How do you think AI will balance complexity with user- friendly design?
Steve Jobs: Nods, fingers tapping the table.
"Complexity is a feature of the designer, not the user. AI must be intuitive. Think of it as a piano: the
instrument is simple, but it can produce symphonies. The best AI will act like a mentor, not a master. It'll
anticipate your needs, but never overshadow your agency.
In 2025, I see AI as a collaborator in every field. A doctor won't just rely on data; they'll partner with AI to diagnose diseases faster. A writer won't fear AI—it'll spark inspiration. The goal isn't to replace h umans, but to amplify our genius."
Interviewer: There are concerns about AI ethics and job displacement. How do you address these?
Steve Jobs: Leans back, thoughtful.
"Ethics aren't a constraint—they're a compass. We've seen what happens when technology outpaces wisdom. But
innovation without conscience is a hollow victory. AI must be built with empathy.
As for jobs, history shows that technology doesn't eliminate work—it transforms it. The farmer of 1900 wasn' t replaced by tractors; they became agronomists. The same will happen here. AI will free us from mundane tas ks, letting us focus on what truly matters: art, connection, and curiosity.
But here's the catch: We must choose how we use it. The power lies in our hands. Will we let AI diminish u s? Or will we wield it to elevate humanity?"
Interviewer: What role do you see for Apple in shaping AI's future?
Steve Jobs: Smiles, a hint of mischief.
"Apple's mission has always been to make technology human. We'll continue to push boundaries, but not for
the sake of spectacle. Imagine an AI that understands your emotions, adapts to your rhythm, and helps you li
ve a more meaningful life.
We're not just building tools—we're crafting experiences. The future isn't about machines thinking like us . It's about machines understanding us. That's where Apple will lead."
Interviewer: Finally, what advice do you have for the next generation of innovators?
Steve Jobs: Leans in, voice steady.
"Stay hungry. Stay foolish. But above all, think differently. Don't just chase trends—ask, 'What's the pro
blem worth solving?' AI is a blank canvas. Use it to create beauty, not noise.
Remember: The best technology is invisible. It doesn't shout. It listens. And when it does, it changes the world."
Interviewer: Thank you, Mr. Jobs. Your vision is as inspiring as ever.
Steve Jobs: Gestures to the camera, a wink.
"Thank you. Now, go make something that matters."
The screen fades to black, leaving the echo of a man who saw the future—and believed in it.
End of Interview
Note: This interview is a fictional recreation, blending Steve Jobs' known philosophies with speculative ad vancements in AI as of 2025.
Tests an AI's ability to generate a complete, working landing page
Recreate an interactive, nostalgic Pokémon battle UI in a single HTML file.
Tests an AI's ability to create interactive web elements
Tests an AI's ability to create a detailed world map in SVG format
Generate a single-page, self-contained HTML webapp using Tailwind CSS for a randomly chosen category/industry/niche.
Generate SVG art of a randomly chosen animal in a setting of its choosing.
Design a modern, minimal landing page for a music streaming app with hero, features, and CTA sections.
