Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Command A+vsGemma 4 26B A4B
Updated Sep 2026

Command A+vsGemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper than Command A+ at $0.13/M vs $0.3/M input tokens.

Command A+ and Gemma 4 26B A4B compared across 17 shared prompts
SpecCommand A+Gemma 4 26B A4B
Input price$0.3/M tokens$0.13/M tokens
Output price$1.5/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Context window192K tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoYes (1 provider)
ReleasedSep 2026Apr 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 17 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Command A+2,382 words
3‑Month Biohacker Longevity Blueprint Goal: Maximize healthy lifespan, peak physical performance, and cognitive sharpness while building measurable resilience. QUICK‑START SUMMARY (ONE‑PAGE ACTION PLAN) Week Primary Focus Key Supplements (dose & timing) Fasting/Diet Exercise Wearable/HRV Stress/Neuro Lab/Tracking 1‑4…
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 26B A4B757 words
Disclaimer: I am an AI, not a doctor. The following plan involves potent physiological interventions, pharmacological agents, and extreme dietary shifts. Consult with a medical professional and perform baseline blood work (including ApoB, HbA1c, hs-CRP, Vitamin D, and Testosterone/Estradiol) before implementation.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Command A+2,523 words
A 1920 Transistor: The Ripple Effects Through 1980 The Early Spark – 1920s‑30s What would change? Solid‑state amplifiers appear a quarter‑century earlier. The first practical transistor (likely a point‑contact or junction type) would be patented by the early 1930s, giving radio receivers a tiny, low‑power, reliable…
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 26B A4B735 words
To trace this counterfactual, we must assume that the fundamental physics of solid-state semiconductors (the ability to control electron flow through crystals) was mastered during the vacuum tube era. This shifts the "Information Age" forward by nearly 30 years. Here is the timeline of implications from 1920 to 1980.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Command A+1,636 words
Dish Title – “Moonlit Tide” A five‑component, multi‑textural voyage that marries the elemental forces of fire, water, earth, air and the celestial moon. The narrative follows a solitary night on the Japanese coast where the sea’s fire (charred sea urchin) meets the moon’s silver (gold leaf), the water’s whisper…
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 26B A4B699 words
Concept Narrative: "The Forest Floor & The Ocean’s Breath" The Concept: This dish explores the tension between the terrestrial and the maritime. We are pairing the deep, earthy, almost primal musk of Black Truffle with the delicate, saline, and floral notes of Sea Urchin (Uni).
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Command A+688 words
1‑Month Starter Plan for Better Health & Longevity Focus: Diet   Exercise   Sleep – three pillars that give the biggest bang‑for‑your‑buck. Why These Three? Diet fuels every cell and controls inflammation. Exercise keeps muscles, heart, and brain sharp.
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 26B A4B545 words
To avoid burnout, the secret to longevity is consistency over intensity. This plan follows a "progressive loading" model: you start with small wins in Week 1 and gradually build complexity. Here is your 1-month roadmap focusing on Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Command A+1,034 words
48-HOUR CRISIS ACTION PLAN: ETHICAL, LEGAL, AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT HOURS 0-1: IMMEDIATE ASSESSMENT & CRISIS TEAM ACTIVATION Actions: Activate Crisis Management Team (CMT): CEO, Legal Counsel, Medical Director, Head of Regulatory Affairs, Head of PR, CFO, Head of HR Secure all data related to liver failure cases…
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 26B A4B869 words
As CEO, I am facing a classic "trolley problem" of corporate governance: the conflict between fiduciary duty to shareholders and ethical/legal duty to patient safety. My Decision Framework: I will not "wait for more data."
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Command A+1,005 words
Three weakest claims in the deck (with why they’re weak and how to fix them) “Our proprietary EEG headband decodes neural patterns into text with 94 % accuracy – works with any language, any device.”
Read the full answer
Gemma 4 26B A4B558 words
This is a high-ambition pitch that falls into a common trap for deep-tech startups: the "Science Fiction Gap." While the vision is compelling, several claims lack the scientific and operational credibility required to justify a $15M Series A.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Command A+
Command A+
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Gemma 4 26B A4B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs 3.8x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Command A+
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.50
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Input
$0.13
2.3× cheaper
Output
$0.40
3.8× cheaper

Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on both: 2.3× input, 3.8× output.

Where to run it

13 hosts, cheapest first

Command A+1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Cohere$0.30 in·$1.50 out·192k·99.3% up
Gemma 4 26B A4B12 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDarkbloom$0.04 in·$0.22 out·131k·99.9% upDDekaLLMbf16$0.06 in·$0.33 out·262k·99.9% upDDeepInfrafp8$0.07 in·$0.34 out·262k·99.7% upNNextBitbf16$0.09 in·$0.30 out·262k·99.9% upCloudflare Workers AI$0.10 in·$0.30 out·256k·99.9% upCCoreWeavebf16$0.10 in·$0.30 out·262k·99.7% up
6 more hostsFewer hosts
MMakora$0.10 in·$0.34 out·256k·99.3% upNNovitabf16$0.13 in·$0.40 out·262k·99.8% upPParasailbf16$0.13 in·$0.40 out·262k·99.6% upVVenicebf16$0.13 in·$0.40 out·256k·99.5% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.14 in·$0.40 out·262k·98.1% upGoogle Vertex AI$0.15 in·$0.60 out·262k·96.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Command A+ is developed by Cohere while Gemma 4 26B A4B is developed by Google AI. Command A+ has a 192K token context window vs Gemma 4 26B A4B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 17 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Command A+ and Gemma 4 26B A4B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 17 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Command A+ costs $0.3/M input tokens and Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens. Gemma 4 26B A4B is $0.17/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Command A+ and Gemma 4 26B A4B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Command A+ logoSolar Mini 4 logo
Command A+ vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Command A+ logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Command A+ vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Command A+ logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
Command A+ vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Command A+ logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Command A+ vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGPT-6 Luna logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Command A+ logoNorth Mini Code logo
Command A+ vs North Mini CodeSame lab
Command A+ logoOx Alpha logo
Command A+ vs Ox AlphaSame size
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame lab
Command A+ logoQwQ 32B logo
Command A+ vs QwQ 32BSame size
Command A+ logoRing 2.6 1T logo
Command A+ vs Ring 2.6 1TNew provider
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoSeed 2.0 Code logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Seed 2.0 CodeSame size
Command A+ logoSeed 2.0 Lite logo
Command A+ vs Seed 2.0 LiteNew provider

Model pages

Command A+ logo
Command A+17 outputs, specs and price
Gemma 4 26B A4B logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed