Nano Banana 2.1 has a larger context window than DALL-E 3 (66K tokens vs 4K tokens).
One prompt, one photorealistic portrait. Skin, eyes, light.
Which answer wins?
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Nano Banana 2.1 has the edge: newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | — | $1.5/M tokens |
| Output price | — | $7.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 4K tokens | 66K tokens |
| Weights | — | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2023 | Oct 2026 |
| At 10M a month | not listed | $15.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 6 Oct 2026.
DALL-E 3 is developed by OpenAI while Nano Banana 2.1 is developed by Google AI. DALL-E 3 has a 4K token context window vs Nano Banana 2.1's 66K. You can compare their actual outputs across 4 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. DALL-E 3 and Nano Banana 2.1 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 4 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DALL-E 3 and Nano Banana 2.1 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.