Nano Banana 2 Lite is cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 at $0.25/M vs $1.5/M input tokens.
One prompt, one photorealistic portrait. Skin, eyes, light.
Which answer wins?
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Nano Banana 2.1 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. Nano Banana 2 Lite costs 5.0x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.25/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.5/M tokens | $7.5/M tokens |
| Context window | — | 66K tokens |
| Weights | — | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | — | No |
| Released | Jun 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $2.50 | $15.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 6 Oct 2026.
Both are developed by Google AI but target different use cases. You can compare their actual outputs across 19 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Nano Banana 2 Lite and Nano Banana 2.1 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 19 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Nano Banana 2 Lite costs $0.25/M input tokens and Nano Banana 2.1 costs $1.5/M input tokens. Nano Banana 2 Lite is $1.25/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Nano Banana 2 Lite and Nano Banana 2.1 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.