DeepSeek V3.1 vs Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air
Compare DeepSeek V3.1 by DeepSeek against Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air by Zhipu AI, in 17 community votes, z.ai: glm 4.5 air wins 88% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 164K vs 128K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, DeepSeek V3.1 or Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air?
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air is the better choice overall, winning 88% of 17 blind community votes on Rival. DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.2/M input tokens vs $0.2/M for Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air. Context windows: 164K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between DeepSeek V3.1 and Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air
DeepSeek V3.1 is made by deepseek while Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air is from zhipu. DeepSeek V3.1 has a 164K token context window compared to Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air's 128K. On pricing, DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.2/M input tokens vs $0.2/M for Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air. In community voting, In 17 community votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air wins 88% of head-to-head duels.
In 17 community votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air wins 88% of head-to-head duels. Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air leads in Web Design, Image Generation, Reasoning. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 17+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air. In 17 blind votes, Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air wins 88% of the time. That's not luck.
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air particularly excels in Image Generation, Reasoning, Web Design.
Style Comparison
Z.AI: GLM 4.5 Air uses 4.2x more emoji
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
