DeepSeek Prover V2 is cheaper than Gemma 4 31B at $0/M vs $0.14/M input tokens.
Pokémon battle screen you can actually click. One HTML file.
Which answer wins?
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemma 4 31B has the edge: newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Free | $0.14/M tokens |
| Output price | Free | $0.4/M tokens |
| Context window | 164K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | Yes (1 provider) |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Apr 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $0 | $1.40 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 11 Oct 2026.
DeepSeek Prover V2 is developed by DeepSeek while Gemma 4 31B is developed by Google AI. DeepSeek Prover V2 has a 164K token context window vs Gemma 4 31B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 5 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. DeepSeek Prover V2 and Gemma 4 31B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 5 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
DeepSeek Prover V2 costs $0/M input tokens and Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens. DeepSeek Prover V2 is $0.14/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek Prover V2 and Gemma 4 31B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.