DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

Compare DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek against Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI, context windows of 164K vs 262K, tested across 45 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

DeepSeek R1 0528 and Google: Gemma 4 31B are both competitive models. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. Context windows: 164K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between DeepSeek R1 0528 and Google: Gemma 4 31B

DeepSeek R1 0528 is made by deepseek while Google: Gemma 4 31B is from google. DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 164K token context window compared to Google: Gemma 4 31B's 262K. On pricing, DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B.

Our Verdict
Google: Gemma 4 31B
Google: Gemma 4 31B
DeepSeek R1 0528
DeepSeek R1 0528Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Google: Gemma 4 31B has the edge — newer, bigger context window.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
80%

Google: Gemma 4 31B uses 23.8x more emoji

DeepSeek R1 0528
Google: Gemma 4 31B
64%Vocabulary57%
10wSentence Length18w
0.30Hedging0.37
6.8Bold7.1
4.9Lists4.0
0.00Emoji0.24
0.40Headings0.94
0.00Transitions0.16
Based on 4 + 23 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

DeepSeek R1 0528Google: Gemma 4 31B
FAQ