DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Compare DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek against Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct by Moonshot AI, context windows of 164K vs 1.0M, tested across 34 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
DeepSeek R1 0528
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek R1 0528
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Input
$0.30
Output
$0.60
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
40%
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct uses 4.6x more transitions
DeepSeek R1 0528
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
64%Vocabulary63%
10wSentence Length15w
0.30Hedging0.19
6.8Bold5.2
4.9Lists3.2
0.00Emoji0.00
0.40Headings0.38
0.00Transitions0.05
Based on 4 + 14 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
