What is the difference between DeepSeek R1 0528 and MiMo-V2-Flash?

DeepSeek R1 0528 is developed by DeepSeek while MiMo-V2-Flash is developed by Xiaomi. DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 164K token context window vs MiMo-V2-Flash's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or MiMo-V2-Flash?

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek R1 0528 and MiMo-V2-Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does DeepSeek R1 0528 cost compared to MiMo-V2-Flash?

DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens and MiMo-V2-Flash costs $0/M input tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash is $0.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare DeepSeek R1 0528 and MiMo-V2-Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek R1 0528 and MiMo-V2-Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Dec 2025

DeepSeek R1 0528vsMiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash has a larger context window than DeepSeek R1 0528 (262K tokens vs 164K tokens).

DeepSeek R1 0528 and MiMo-V2-Flash compared across 54 shared prompts
Spec	DeepSeek R1 0528	MiMo-V2-Flash
Input price	Free	Free
Output price	Free	Free
Context window	164K tokens	262K tokens
Weights	Open	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	May 2025	Dec 2025
SWE-bench Verified	57.6%	73.4%