What is the difference between DeepSeek R1 and GLM 4.7 Flash?

DeepSeek R1 is developed by DeepSeek while GLM 4.7 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI. DeepSeek R1 has a 128K token context window vs GLM 4.7 Flash's 200K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 or GLM 4.7 Flash?

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek R1 and GLM 4.7 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does DeepSeek R1 cost compared to GLM 4.7 Flash?

DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens and GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.07/M input tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash is $0.48/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare DeepSeek R1 and GLM 4.7 Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek R1 and GLM 4.7 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between DeepSeek R1 and GLM 4.7 Flash?

DeepSeek R1 is developed by DeepSeek while GLM 4.7 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI. DeepSeek R1 has a 128K token context window vs GLM 4.7 Flash's 200K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 or GLM 4.7 Flash?

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek R1 and GLM 4.7 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does DeepSeek R1 cost compared to GLM 4.7 Flash?

DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens and GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.07/M input tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash is $0.48/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare DeepSeek R1 and GLM 4.7 Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek R1 and GLM 4.7 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

DeepSeek R1 vs GLM 4.7 Flash: Which Is Better?

Updated Jan 2026

Our Verdict

DeepSeek R1

GLM 4.7 Flash

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

GLM 4.7 Flash is 5.5x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek R1

Input

$0.55

Output

$2.19

GLM 4.7 Flash

Input

$0.07

7.9× cheaper

Output

$0.40

5.5× cheaper

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper on both — 7.9× input, 5.5× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

47%

DeepSeek R1 uses 4.3x more emoji

DeepSeek R1

GLM 4.7 Flash

62%Vocabulary52%

15wSentence Length15w

0.52Hedging0.33

8.0Bold5.8

5.7Lists4.7

0.04Emoji0.00

0.62Headings0.68

0.28Transitions0.13

Based on 22 + 19 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

DeepSeek R1 and GLM 4.7 Flash have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs xAI: Grok 4New provider

Updated Jan 2026

Our Verdict

DeepSeek R1

GLM 4.7 Flash

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

GLM 4.7 Flash is 5.5x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek R1

Input

$0.55

Output

$2.19

GLM 4.7 Flash

Input

$0.07

7.9× cheaper

Output

$0.40

5.5× cheaper

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper on both — 7.9× input, 5.5× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

47%

DeepSeek R1 uses 4.3x more emoji

DeepSeek R1

GLM 4.7 Flash

62%Vocabulary52%

15wSentence Length15w

0.52Hedging0.33

8.0Bold5.8

5.7Lists4.7

0.04Emoji0.00

0.62Headings0.68

0.28Transitions0.13

Based on 22 + 19 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

DeepSeek R1 and GLM 4.7 Flash have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs xAI: Grok 4New provider