Compare DeepSeek R1 by DeepSeek against GLM 4.7 Flash by Zhipu AI, context windows of 128K vs 200K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
DeepSeek R1 and GLM 4.7 Flash are both competitive models. DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens vs $0.07/M for GLM 4.7 Flash. Context windows: 128K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
DeepSeek R1 is made by deepseek while GLM 4.7 Flash is from zhipu. DeepSeek R1 has a 128K token context window compared to GLM 4.7 Flash's 200K. On pricing, DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens vs $0.07/M for GLM 4.7 Flash.
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
GLM 4.7 Flash is 5.5x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper on both — 7.9× input, 5.5× output
DeepSeek R1 uses 4.3x more emoji
Compare DeepSeek R1 by DeepSeek against GLM 4.7 Flash by Zhipu AI, context windows of 128K vs 200K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
DeepSeek R1 and GLM 4.7 Flash are both competitive models. DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens vs $0.07/M for GLM 4.7 Flash. Context windows: 128K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
DeepSeek R1 is made by deepseek while GLM 4.7 Flash is from zhipu. DeepSeek R1 has a 128K token context window compared to GLM 4.7 Flash's 200K. On pricing, DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens vs $0.07/M for GLM 4.7 Flash.
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
GLM 4.7 Flash is 5.5x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper on both — 7.9× input, 5.5× output
DeepSeek R1 uses 4.3x more emoji