Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)vsLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Updated Aug 2026

DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)vsLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free)

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is cheaper than DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) at $0/M vs $0.14/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) compared across 20 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V3 (March 2024)Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Input price$0.14/M tokensFree
Output price$0.28/M tokensFree
Context window128K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoYes (1 provider)
ReleasedMar 2024Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 20 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)427 words
1) Year-by-Year Financial Projections (FY2026–FY2030) Metric FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue ($m) 972 1,040 1,102 1,157 1,215 EBITDA ($m) 136 156 176 191 207 EBITDA Margin (%) 14.0% 15.0% 16.0% 16.5% 17.0% Cash Interest ($m) - Term Loan (9.0%) 43.2 43.2 43.2 43.2 43.2 - Mezzanine (12.0%) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0…
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)556 words
Entry & Sources & Uses FY2025 EBITDA: $120m Purchase Price (EV): 12.0x × $120m = $1,440m Transaction Fees: 2.0% × $1,440m = $28.8m Total Uses: $1,440m + $28.8m = $1,468.8m Total Leverage: 5.5x × $120m = $660m Term Loan: 4.0x × $120m = $480m (9.0% cash interest, 1.0% mandatory amortization = $4.8m/yr) Mezzanine: 1.5x ×…
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)523 words
Dish Title: "Oceanic Reverie – A Dialogue of Sea and Forest" Concept: A Michelin 3-star dish that bridges the briny depths of the ocean with the earthy mystique of the forest, using avant-garde techniques to create harmony between unlikely ingredients: abalone and black truffle.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)2,253 words
L'Archipel des Ombres (The Archipelago of Shadows) Michelin-Caliber Multi-Component Dish 7 Components Conceptual Narrative: Memory, Mineral Essence, and the Meeting of Land and Sea CONCEPTUAL NARRATIVE This dish is an edible cartography—a map of an imaginary archipelago where volcanic soil meets oceanic tides.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)157 words
Recipe: "Golden Honey Butter Toasties" A simple, sweet, and satisfying treat made with pantry staples—crispy on the outside, gooey on the inside! Ingredients (7 total): Bread (4 slices) Butter (4 tbsp, softened) Honey (2 tbsp) Cinnamon (1 tsp) Brown sugar (2 tbsp) Vanilla extract (½ tsp) Salt (a pinch) Instructions…
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)166 words
Midnight Molten Lava Cake Ingredients: All-purpose flour (4 tbsp) Granulated sugar (4 tbsp) Unsweetened cocoa powder (2 tbsp) Vegetable oil (3 tbsp) Water (2 tbsp) Vanilla extract (¼ tsp) Baking powder (¼ tsp) Instructions: Combine Dry Ingredients: In a standard microwave-safe mug, whisk together the flour, sugar…
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)608 words
The invention of the transistor in 1920 instead of 1947 would have dramatically accelerated technological progress and reshaped the 20th century. Below is a detailed analysis of the likely impacts across various domains, including second and third-order effects. 1.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)2,066 words
The 1920 Transistor: A Counterfactual Analysis Through 1980 I. Premise and Plausibility For a transistor to emerge in 1920, we must assume that either the theoretical framework of semiconductor physics was accelerated (quantum mechanics was only being formulated in the mid-1920s), or that empirical discovery—building…
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)611 words
3-Month Longevity & Performance Optimization Plan for Biohackers By combining cutting-edge science, personalized tracking, and advanced biohacking strategies, this plan maximizes longevity, physical performance, and cognitive function.
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)2,898 words
🧬 THE BIOHACKER'S 90-DAY LONGEVITY OPTIMIZATION PLAN Disclaimer: This plan is for informational purposes only. Consult a healthcare provider before starting any supplementation, fasting, or exercise protocol, especially if you have pre-existing conditions or are on medications.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)403 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with explanations and suggested improvements: Weak Claim: "94% accuracy" in decoding neural patterns into text (Slide 3) Why it's weak: No context for how "accuracy" is measured (e.g., word-level, character-level, or intent prediction?).
Read the full answer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)961 words
The 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch 🚨 The $180B TAM Claim (Slide 4) Why it's weak: This is the most logically incoherent claim in the entire deck. The pitch states the BCI market is projected to reach $5.3B by 2030 (citing Grand View Research) — and then immediately claims a TAM of $180B.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)
DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)
Input
$0.14
Output
$0.28
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

4 hosts, cheapest first

DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)3 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.24 in·$0.90 out·164k·90.8% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.25 in·$1.00 out·164k·98.7% upGGMI Cloudfp8$0.29 in·$1.14 out·164k·94.9% up
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovita$0 in·$0 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) is developed by DeepSeek while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is developed by inclusionAI. DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) has a 128K token context window vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 20 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 20 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) costs $0.14/M input tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) costs $0/M input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) is $0.14/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) logoHy3 logo
DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) logoGLM 5.3 logo
DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) logoDeepSeek V4.1 Flash logo
DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSame lab
DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) logoDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Version compare
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ling 3.0 FlashSame lab
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash Sante (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs Ling 3.0 Flash Sante (free)Same lab
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoMiMo-V2.5 logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs MiMo-V2.5Same size
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoMiMo-V2.5-Pro logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs MiMo-V2.5-ProNew provider
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoMiMo-V2.6-Flash logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashSame size
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logoMiMo-V2.6-Pro logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) vs MiMo-V2.6-ProSame size

Model pages

DeepSeek V3 (March 2024) logo
DeepSeek V3 (March 2024)59 outputs, specs and price
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)20 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed