DeepSeek V3.2 ExpvsGPT-4.1
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is cheaper than GPT-4.1 at $0.2/M vs $2/M input tokens.
| Spec | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | GPT-4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.2/M tokens | $2/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.4/M tokens | $8/M tokens |
| Context window | 164K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2025 | Apr 2025 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 67.8% | 54.6% |
Our Verdict
GPT-4.1
DeepSeek V3.2 ExpRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-4.1 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs 20x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Input
$0.20
10× cheaper
Output
$0.40
20× cheaper
GPT-4.1
Input
$2.00
Output
$8.00
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is cheaper on both: 10× input, 20× output.
Where to run it
5 hosts
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 8 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
75%
GPT-4.1 uses 17.1x more emoji
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
GPT-4.1
57%Vocabulary58%
18wSentence Length19w
0.41Hedging0.49
5.8Bold8.8
3.8Lists5.8
0.01Emoji0.22
0.84Headings1.01
0.03Transitions0.10
Based on 24 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Ox AlphaNew provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs MiniMax M3New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Claude Opus 4New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Mercury 2New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewNew provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs MiMo-V2-FlashNew provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs MiMo-V2-OmniNew provider