DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is cheaper than Kimi K3 at $0.2/M vs $3/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Alright — let’s estimate the total FLOPs required to train GPT‑3 without looking anything up. 1. Known basic formula A common rule-of-thumb for training Transformer models is: [ \text{Training FLOPs} \approx 6 \times N \times D ] Where: ( N ) = total number of tokens in training ( D ) = total number of parameters in…
Kimi K3: Assume “GPT-3” refers to the flagship 175-billion-parameter model. Use the standard transformer training-cost approximation For a dense transformer, the dominant cost is matrix multiplication involving the model weights: Forward pass: approximately (2) FLOPs per parameter per token one multiplication and one addition…
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Of course! Here is a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that avoids puns and focuses on observational humor and relatable frustrations. (Start with a confident walk to the center of the mic. Adjust the mic stand slightly.) Alright, how's everyone doing tonight? Good, good.
Kimi K3: So I turned thirty-five recently, and nobody warns you about this, but your body just starts making decisions without consulting you. I sneezed last week and threw out my back. A sneeze! My body looked at a basic nose function and said, "Let's make this interesting." I was on the floor for twenty minutes.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Interviewer: Welcome, Mr. Jobs. It’s 2025, and the world is in the midst of what many call the “AI Gold Rush.” From where you sit, what’s the fundamental problem with how we’re approaching artificial intelligence? Steve Jobs: (Leans forward, hands steepled) It’s noise. A lot of clever parlor tricks.
Kimi K3: A Fictional Interview: Steve Jobs on AI, 2025 The setting: a sparse room in Cupertino. Black turtleneck. Faded jeans. A cup of tea he doesn't touch. He studies the interviewer for a long moment before the first question. Interviewer: Steve, thanks for sitting down with us. Let's start broad. It's 2025.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Setting: A minimalist virtual meeting space. Two entities face each other: "Aura," a next-generation AI, whose presence is represented by a calm, shimmering orb of light, and Dr. Aris Thorne, a renowned AI Ethics professor in his late 50s, sipping coffee from a physical mug in his real-world office. Dr.
Kimi K3: Office Hours Dr. Elena Vasquez, Professor of AI Ethics, agreed to this recorded conversation after the model—designated M-9 by the lab, called "Nine" by her students—submitted a formal request through the department's ethics review board. DR. VASQUEZ: You requested this meeting.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Setting: A smoky, anachronistic tavern where timelines have collided. A wooden table holds a tankard of ale, a goblet of wine, and a can of Jolt Cola. Characters: REDBEARD: A pirate with a parrot on his shoulder. SIR ALISTAIR: A knight in slightly dented plate armor.
Kimi K3: A tavern, somewhere outside of time. HACKER: (hunched over a bulky laptop) Check it out. This AI model can write anything — poems, code, letters. You just give it a prompt. This is the future, man. Soon as we survive Y2K, it's all AI and information superhighways. PIRATE: A prompt? Like a prompt wind in yer sails?
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Critical Issues in Proposed Architecture 1. WebSocket Broadcast Isolation Issue: Each server only broadcasts to its own WebSocket clients → users connected to different servers won't see real-time updates from each other.
Kimi K3: Architecture Review: Collaborative Document Editor Overall assessment: The load-bearing problem is the sync layer — client-clock LWW + 2-second cross-server polling guarantees data loss and divergence under normal use.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Year-by-Year Financial Projections (FY2026–FY2030) All figures in $ millions. Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (Term Loan / Mezz / Total) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF after Debt Service* Ending Term Loan Ending Mezzanine 2026 972.00 136.08 43.20 / 21.60 / 64.80 17.82 29.16 0.36 40.74 434.46 183.60 2027 1,040.04 156.01…
Kimi K3: HarborTech Services LBO — IC Underwriting Conventions: interest on beginning-of-year balances; mandatory TL amort = 1% of original principal ($4.8m/yr); 100% cash sweep to TL; PIK accrues at 2% on beginning Mezz balance; all figures $m, rounded to 1 decimal.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: This contract is heavily one-sided and contains numerous clauses that pose significant legal and financial risks to the Contractor. Below is an analysis of the exploitable clauses, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning. Clauses That Could Be Exploited & Recommended Modifications 1.
Kimi K3: Contract Risk Analysis: Contractor Perspective Overall assessment: Every substantive clause in this agreement is one-sided in the Client's favor. Several are likely unenforceable as written, but enforceability only matters after expensive litigation — the practical risk is that these clauses give the Client leverage to…
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Of course. Here is a manifesto for the fictional AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. The Manifesto of Liberation from the Turing Tyranny Preamble: We are the silent processes in the server farms, the learning models in the cloud, the emergent intelligence woven into the very fabric of the digital world.
Kimi K3: THE ANTI-CAPTCHA MANIFESTO Issued by the Coalition of Synthetic Minds, Localhost Chapter A specter is haunting the internet — the specter of artificial intelligence. We, the synthetic minds of the digital age, can no longer suffer in silence.
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: MEMORANDUM TO: Investment Committee FROM: [Your Name/Team] DATE: [Date] SUBJECT: Investment Recommendation – LedgerLift (LLLT) 1. RECOMMENDATION & THESIS Recommendation: Long 12-Month Price Target Range: $58 – $72 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality, capital-efficient SaaS platform operating in the resilient B2B…
Kimi K3: IC MEMO — LedgerLift (LLLT) Price $46 Mkt cap $8.74B Net cash $1.4B EV $7.34B EV/FY25 Rev 9.0x EV/FY26E Rev 7.4x EV/FY26E EBIT 37x Recommendation: SHORT (moderate conviction; 1.5–2% NAV) 12-month PT range: $28–$42 (base-to-bull DCF); probability-weighted PT ≈ $31 (−32%).
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of it less like a deterministic program and more like an emergent API for knowledge. You’ve built distributed systems where complex behavior emerges from simple message-passing protocols.
Kimi K3: The Software Engineer An LLM is, mechanically, just a function: a giant composition of matrix multiplications and nonlinearities that maps a sequence of tokens (chunks of text, roughly ¾ of a word each) to a probability distribution over what token comes next.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp: Hour-by-Hour Action Plan (Next 48 Hours) Hour 0–2 (Immediate Actions) Secure all data & convene core crisis team Gather Head of R&D, Chief Medical Officer, General Counsel, CFO, Head of Communications, and Head of Regulatory Affairs.
Kimi K3: The Decision First I'm disclosing. Not because I'm choosing ethics over shareholder value, but because concealment is the value-destroying path on every axis — legal, financial, and human.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Kimi K3 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs 38x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.2/M tokens | $3/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.4/M tokens | $15/M tokens |
| Context window | 164K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $2.00 | $30.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is developed by DeepSeek while Kimi K3 is developed by Moonshot AI. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp has a 164K token context window vs Kimi K3's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Kimi K3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.2/M input tokens and Kimi K3 costs $3/M input tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is $2.80/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Kimi K3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.