DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 4

Compare DeepSeek V3.2 by DeepSeek against Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic, context windows of 131K vs 200K, tested across 35 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, DeepSeek V3.2 or Claude Opus 4?

DeepSeek V3.2 and Claude Opus 4 are both competitive models. DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.28/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. Context windows: 131K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between DeepSeek V3.2 and Claude Opus 4

DeepSeek V3.2 is made by deepseek while Claude Opus 4 is from anthropic. DeepSeek V3.2 has a 131K token context window compared to Claude Opus 4's 200K. On pricing, DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.28/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4.

Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Opus 4 has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window.

DeepSeek V3.2 is 179x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
100%

Claude Opus 4 uses 11.2x more emoji

DeepSeek V3.2
Claude Opus 4
52%Vocabulary64%
31wSentence Length62w
0.58Hedging0.52
6.3Bold4.4
5.4Lists9.1
0.00Emoji0.11
0.80Headings1.87
0.13Transitions0.27
Based on 24 + 16 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

DeepSeek V3.2Claude Opus 4

Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.

178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.

Model Similarity Index

185x

price gap between models that write identically

178

models

12

clone pairs

32

dimensions

Devstral M / S
95.7%
Qwen3 Coder / Flash
95.6%
GPT-5.4 / Mini
93.3%

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions