DeepSeek V3.2vsGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) is cheaper than DeepSeek V3.2 at $0.15/M vs $0.28/M input tokens.
| Spec | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.28/M tokens | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.42/M tokens | $3.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Released | Dec 2025 | May 2025 |
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V3.2
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, DeepSeek V3.2 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer.
DeepSeek V3.2 costs 8.3x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek V3.2
Input
$0.28
Output
$0.42
8.3× cheaper
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)
Input
$0.15
1.9× cheaper
Output
$3.50
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) wins input (1.9× cheaper)·DeepSeek V3.2 wins output (8.3× cheaper)
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
27%
DeepSeek V3.2 uses 57.8x more hedging
DeepSeek V3.2
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)
52%Vocabulary70%
31wSentence Length11w
0.58Hedging0.00
6.3Bold4.2
5.4Lists7.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.80Headings0.00
0.13Transitions0.00
Based on 24 + 3 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
DeepSeek V3.2 vs MiniMax M3New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Grok 4New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507New provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3 30B A3BNew provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507New provider