DeepSeek V3.2
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
DeepSeek V3.2 vs xAI: Grok 4
Compare DeepSeek V3.2 by DeepSeek against xAI: Grok 4 by xAI, context windows of 131K vs 256K, tested across 38 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, DeepSeek V3.2 or xAI: Grok 4?
DeepSeek V3.2 and xAI: Grok 4 are both competitive models. DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.28/M input tokens vs $3/M for xAI: Grok 4. Context windows: 131K vs 256K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between DeepSeek V3.2 and xAI: Grok 4
DeepSeek V3.2 is made by deepseek while xAI: Grok 4 is from xai. DeepSeek V3.2 has a 131K token context window compared to xAI: Grok 4's 256K. On pricing, DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.28/M input tokens vs $3/M for xAI: Grok 4.
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V3.2
xAI: Grok 4
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
DeepSeek V3.2 is 36x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
97%
xAI: Grok 4 uses 7.0x more emoji
DeepSeek V3.2
xAI: Grok 4
52%Vocabulary53%
31wSentence Length18w
0.58Hedging0.67
6.3Bold2.7
5.4Lists2.7
0.00Emoji0.07
0.80Headings0.86
0.13Transitions0.04
Based on 24 + 21 text responses
vs
Ask them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ