Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)vsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) at $0.11/M vs $0.15/M input tokens.
| Spec | Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.15/M tokens | $0.11/M tokens |
| Output price | $3.5/M tokens | $0.6/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 131K tokens |
| Released | May 2025 | Jul 2025 |
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs 5.8x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)
Input
$0.15
Output
$3.50
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
1.4× cheaper
Output
$0.60
5.8× cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 1.4× input, 5.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
57%
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 37.5x more hedging
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
70%Vocabulary56%
11wSentence Length14w
0.00Hedging0.37
4.2Bold5.7
7.3Lists4.0
0.00Emoji0.54
0.00Headings0.70
0.00Transitions0.14
Based on 3 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) vs Qwen Plus 0728Cross-provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)Cross-provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) vs Qwen3 0.6BCross-provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) vs Qwen3 235B A22BCross-provider