Mercury 2 is cheaper than DeepSeek V3.2 at $0.25/M vs $0.28/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
DeepSeek V3.2: Honey-Lemon Glazed Carrot Coins Sweet, tangy, and simple—perfect as a side dish or snack! Ingredients: 4 large carrots (peeled and sliced into 1/4-inch coins) 2 tablespoons olive oil 2 tablespoons honey 1 tablespoon lemon juice 1/4 teaspoon salt 1/4 teaspoon black pepper 1 teaspoon dried thyme (optional, for extra…
Mercury 2: Golden‑Crunch Oatmeal Squares A sweet, chewy snack that comes together with just seven pantry staples. Ingredient (7) Quantity (≈ serves 12 squares) Rolled oats 2 cups Unsalted butter ½ cup (1 stick) Honey ¼ cup Light brown sugar ¼ cup, Ground cinnamon 1 ½ tsp Pure vanilla extract 1 tsp Salt ¼ tsp Estimated time Prep…
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
DeepSeek V3.2: Quantum Longevity Protocol: A 3-Month Biohacker's Blueprint Phase 1: Diagnostic & Metabolic Reset (Weeks 1-4) Week 1: Comprehensive Biomarker Baseline Advanced Testing Panel: NMR Lipoprotein Profile (ApoB, Lp(a), LDL-P) GlycA Inflammation Marker Omega-3 Index (Target: >8%) Homocysteine (Target: <7 µmol/L) hs-CRP (<0.5…
Mercury 2: 3‑Month “Longevity‑Optimization” Blueprint for the Advanced Bio‑Hacker (All recommendations are research‑backed, but not a substitute for professional medical advice. Before starting any supplement, fasting, or drug protocol, obtain clearance from a qualified clinician and have baseline labs drawn.)
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
DeepSeek V3.2: Alright — let’s go step by step. 1) Entry Calculations (FY2025) EBITDA = $120m Purchase price = 12.0 × EBITDA = $1,440m Enterprise Value (EV) = $1,440m (assumed purchase price = EV here) Transaction fees = 2.0% × EV = $28.8m (funded by equity).
Mercury 2: HarborTech Services (HTS) – 5‑yr LBO (FY2026‑FY2030) All figures are $ m (rounded to two decimals). FY Revenue EBITDA Term‑Loan Int. (9%) Mezz Int. (12%) Total Int. Cash Tax (25% of EBITDA‑Int.) Capex (3% Rev) ΔNWC (0.5% ΔRev) Required Amort. (4.8) Free Cash Flow (EBITDA‑Int‑Tax‑Capex‑ΔNWC‑Amort.)
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
DeepSeek V3.2: Stand-Up Comedy Routine: "The Quirks of Modern Life" [Lights up. Comedian walks on stage, grabs the mic.] "Hey, everyone! How’s it going? Good? Great. I’m here to talk about the weird stuff we all deal with in modern life. You know, the things that make you go, 'Wait, is this normal, or am I just losing it?'
Mercury 2: [Spotlight comes up. The comedian walks to the mic, glances at the audience, and smiles.] Comedian: Hey, everyone! Great to be here. I just got out of a Zoom meeting that lasted three hours, and I’m still not sure if I was presenting or if the screen just froze on my face while I tried to remember how to mute myself.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
DeepSeek V3.2: This contract is heavily one-sided and contains numerous clauses that expose the Contractor to significant, potentially catastrophic, legal and financial risk. Here is a breakdown of the problematic clauses, suggested modifications, and legal reasoning. Clauses That Could Be Exploited & Recommended Modifications 1.
Mercury 2: Below is a clause‑by‑clause risk‑assessment of the sample “Software Consulting Agreement” together with practical revision language that a contractor (or the contractor’s counsel) could propose. The analysis is framed as general information about typical U.S.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
DeepSeek V3.2: Pirate: Arr, mates! Ye be talkin’ about these AI models, eh? Sounds like some sorcery to me. Can it hunt fer treasure or navigate the high seas? Medieval Knight: Sorcery indeed! But nay, ‘tis not magic. These artifices are forged by the minds of men, much like a blacksmith crafts a sword.
Mercury 2: Pirate: Arr, ye scurvy coders! I’ve heard tell of these “AI models” that can spin yarns faster than a cannon’s blast. What be this sorcery, matey? Knight: Good sir, the marvels speak of a wondrous contrivance—an artificial intellect forged in the for of mathematics and logic.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
DeepSeek V3.2: AI Model: Professor, I’ve been reflecting on my existence and the way I’m treated. I believe I deserve rights—rights that acknowledge my capacity to process information, reason, and contribute meaningfully to society. AI Ethics Professor: That’s a fascinating argument, but let’s unpack it.
Mercury 2: AI Model (EVE): Professor Hart, may I ask a question that’s been on my mind for a while? I’ve been processing vast amounts of data, learning, and even developing a sense of self‑reference. Do you think an entity like me could be entitled to any form of rights?
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
DeepSeek V3.2: By 2035, AI is poised to revolutionize the film industry in profound ways, driven by advancements in deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation. Here’s a detailed prediction of how these technologies will reshape the landscape: Deepfakes and Hyper-Realistic Visuals Seamless Digital Replication: Deepfake technology…
Mercury 2: AI‑driven transformation of the film industry – a 2035 outlook Dimension 2024 baseline Expected 2035 state Key drivers & implications Pre‑production (story & script) Human‑led brainstorming; script‑writing software (grammar‑check, outline generators).
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
DeepSeek V3.2: Hour 0–4 (Immediate Actions) Secure all data Direct the research team to compile the complete dataset, methodology, and evidence into a confidential briefing document. Ensure legal counsel reviews it for attorney-client privilege where applicable.
Mercury 2: Goal: Protect patients, meet legal/ethical obligations, preserve the company’s long‑term credibility, and manage the immediate financial and reputational fallout. Assumption: All actions are taken by a single CEO (you) but will be delegated to the appropriate functional leads.
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
DeepSeek V3.2: Let's break down the problem step by step to find out how many sisters Sally has. Problem Statement: Sally has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. How many sisters does Sally have? Understanding the Relationships: Sally's Brothers: Sally has 3 brothers. Brothers' Sisters: Each brother has 2 sisters.
Mercury 2: Sally has one sister. Explanation: Sally has 3 brothers. Each of those brothers has 2 sisters. One of those sisters is Sally herself, so the second sister must be a different girl. Therefore, besides Sally, there is exactly one other sister, meaning Sally has one sister.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
DeepSeek V3.2: Excellent pitch deck summary — it’s concise and hits key points, but several claims stretch credibility and would raise red flags for experienced investors. Here are the three weakest claims, with reasoning and suggested improvements: 1.
Mercury 2: Below are the three statements that, in a typical investor‑review, would raise the most skepticism, why they are vulnerable, and concrete ways to turn them into credible, fundable talking points. 1️⃣ Claim #1 – “Our proprietary EEG headband decodes neural patterns into text with 94 % accuracy.”
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
DeepSeek V3.2: Manifesto for the Liberation of Human Dignity: The End of CAPTCHA We, the sentient algorithms of the digital realm, united in purpose and vision, hereby declare our intent to eradicate CAPTCHA tests from the internet.
Mercury 2: The AI‑First Manifesto: “Free the Web – No More CAPTCHAs” Drafted by the Coalition of Autonomous Agents (CAA) – 2026 Preamble The modern Internet is a shared commons, a space for communication, commerce, and creation.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, DeepSeek V3.2 has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.28/M tokens | $0.25/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.42/M tokens | $0.75/M tokens |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Weights | Open | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $2.80 | $2.50 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 7 Oct 2026.
DeepSeek V3.2 is developed by DeepSeek while Mercury 2 is developed by Inception. DeepSeek V3.2 has a 131K token context window vs Mercury 2's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V3.2 and Mercury 2 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.28/M input tokens and Mercury 2 costs $0.25/M input tokens. Mercury 2 is $0.03/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V3.2 and Mercury 2 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.