Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731vsGPT-6 Luna
Updated Sep 2026

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731vsGPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna is cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 at $0.1/M vs $0.14/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and GPT-6 Luna compared across 18 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731GPT-6 Luna
Input price$0.14/M tokens$0.1/M tokens
Output price$0.28/M tokens$0.5/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.1M tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 18 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731287 words
Here is a simple, comforting, and deeply flavorful recipe that comes together in just 20 minutes using only 7 common pantry staples. Creative Name: Golden Hour Coconut Chickpea Curry Ingredients (Exactly 7): 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas, drained and rinsed 1 can (13.5 oz) full-fat coconut milk 1 medium yellow onion 3 cloves…
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Luna113 words
Crispy Parmesan Chickpeas A crunchy, savory snack with a cheesy finish Ingredients (7): 1 can chickpeas, drained and dried 1 tablespoon olive oil ½ teaspoon salt ½ teaspoon paprika ¼ teaspoon garlic powder ¼ cup grated Parmesan 1 tablespoon lemon juice Prep time: 5 minutes Cook time: 30–35 minutes Instructions: Heat…
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

DeepSeek V4 Flash 07311,888 words
This contract is heavily one-sided: it gives the Client nearly all rights and discretion while assigning the Contractor nearly all risk and liability. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis, with the exploitative features, proposed modifications, and legal reasoning. This is general legal information, not legal advice.
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Luna2,040 words
This agreement is strongly one-sided. The enforceability of particular terms—especially the non-compete, liability provisions, and arbitration clause—depends on the governing law and the facts. The agreement does not identify a governing law, which is itself a significant gap.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731910 words
Based on the pitch deck summary, here are the 3 weakest claims, along with the specific reasoning and concrete improvements for each. The "94% accuracy... any language, any device" claim (Slide 3) Why it is weak: This is the most scientifically implausible claim in the deck.
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Luna421 words
“94% accuracy” and “predict what you want to type before you think it” Why it’s weak: This is the deck’s central technical claim, but “accuracy” is undefined: Is it word-level or character-level accuracy, measured on a fixed vocabulary or open-ended text, and under what conditions?
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731967 words
Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for absolute beginners. The goal is consistency over intensity. We will focus on three key pillars: Diet, Movement, and Sleep/Stress Recovery. You don’t need to be perfect—just aim for 80% adherence. If you miss a day, don’t double up tomorrow; just get back on track.
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Luna330 words
A simple 1-month starter plan Choose three foundations: food, movement, and sleep. Aim for steady habits, not perfection. If you have a health condition, significant pain, or concerns about changing your activity or diet, check with a healthcare professional first.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

DeepSeek V4 Flash 07311,562 words
The 3-Month Longevity & Performance Optimization Protocol (Biohacker Edition) Disclaimer: This protocol is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult a qualified physician (ideally one familiar with longevity medicine) before starting any new supplement, fasting, or exercise regimen.
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Luna1,874 words
12-week longevity and performance plan This plan is for a generally healthy adult who wants to improve fitness, metabolic health, sleep, and cognitive performance—not a substitute for medical care or a promise to slow aging.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

DeepSeek V4 Flash 07311,719 words
Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks The described architecture has several critical weaknesses that undermine reliability, consistency, and scalability in a real-time collaborative editor. Below is a systematic analysis with proposed solutions and trade-offs.
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Luna1,979 words
The main architectural risk is that the system treats collaborative editing as “write a value, then broadcast it.” That works poorly under concurrency, server failures, reconnects, and scale.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Input
$0.14
Output
$0.28
1.8× cheaper
GPT-6 Luna
Input
$0.10
1.4× cheaper
Output
$0.50

GPT-6 Luna wins input (1.4× cheaper)·DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 wins output (1.8× cheaper)

Where to run it

32 hosts, cheapest first

DeepSeek V4 Flash 073129 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
RRelacefp4$0.03 in·$0.32 out·1M·99.8% upSSail Researchfp4$0.03 in·$0.55 out·1M·99% upSStreamLakefp8$0.05 in·$0.16 out·1M·99.6% upDDeepInfrafp8$0.06 in·$0.18 out·1M·99.8% upWWafer$0.08 in·$0.35 out·1M·100% upIInceptronfp4$0.08 in·$0.41 out·1M·99.8% up
23 more hostsFewer hosts
RReka$0.09 in·$0.53 out·262k·99.8% upMMakora$0.09 in·$0.20 out·1M·98.5% upDDigitalOcean$0.12 in·$0.24 out·1M·100% upBBasetenfp8$0.13 in·$0.26 out·1M·100% upCCoreWeavefp8$0.13 in·$0.28 out·262k·99.9% upPParasailfp8$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·99.6% upTTogether$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·98% upOOpenInferencefp8$0.14 in·$0.70 out·1M·99.2% upMMorph$0.14 in·$0.40 out·1M·99.2% upVVenice$0.17 in·$0.35 out·1M·99.6% upMMancerfp8$0.20 in·$0.60 out·1M·96% upFFireworks$0.22 in·$0.66 out·1M·98.6% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.22 in·$0.66 out·1M·99.1% upGGMI Cloudfp8$0.29 in·$0.86 out·1M·99.9% upAlibaba Cloud$0.35 in·$1.06 out·1M·99.8% upNNextBitfp8$0.35 in·$1.06 out·1M·99.9% upNNovitafp8$0.41 in·$1.23 out·1M·100% upAAtlasCloudfp4$0.44 in·$1.32 out·1M·97.6% upBaidu Qianfanfp8$0.44 in·$1.32 out·1M·99.9% upCloudflare Workers AI$0.44 in·$1.32 out·1.3M·100% upPPhala$0.44 in·$1.32 out·1M·99.3% upCoheredegraded$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·99.3% upNNebiusfp8degraded$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·86.3% up
GPT-6 Luna3 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$0.10 in·$0.50 out·1.1M·88.4% upOpenAI$0.10 in·$0.50 out·1.1M·99.9% upAmazon Bedrock$0.11 in·$0.55 out·1.1M·99.8% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is developed by DeepSeek while GPT-6 Luna is developed by OpenAI. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has a 1.0M token context window vs GPT-6 Luna's 1.1M. You can compare their actual outputs across 18 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and GPT-6 Luna each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 18 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs $0.14/M input tokens and GPT-6 Luna costs $0.1/M input tokens. GPT-6 Luna is $0.04/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and GPT-6 Luna across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logoSolar Mini 4 logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
GPT-6 Luna logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
GPT-6 Luna logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logoCommand A+ logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
GPT-6 Luna logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
GPT-6 Luna vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
GPT-6 Luna logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSame lab
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logoDeepSeek V4.1 Flash logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSame lab
GPT-6 Luna logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
GPT-6 Luna logoGPT-6 Sol logo
GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 SolSame lab
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logoQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Same size
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logoQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Same size
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logoQwen3 Coder logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3 CoderNew provider
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logoQwen3 Coder Flash logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3 Coder FlashNew provider

Model pages

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 073145 outputs, specs and price
GPT-6 Luna logo
GPT-6 Luna20 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed