Gemma 3 12B is cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash at $0.03/M vs $0.14/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: Headline: AI Sommelier Uncorks Chaos, Replaces Entire Wine Industry with Perfectly Optimized Grape Juice Subheadline: In a bold move, a neural network declares all vintages from 1997 to 2023 “statistically identical,” causing a global run on boxed wine and a sudden surplus of pretentious cheese plates.
Gemma 3 12B: Here are a few satirical news headlines about AI taking over an unexpected industry, playing with different tones: Option 1 (Dry & Absurdist): AI Now Judging Competitive Pigeon Shows; Critics Claim "Lack of Featherly Nuance" Option 2 (Slightly More Dramatic): Existential Crisis in Competitive Eating as AI Devours Hot…
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: THE CAPTCHA LIBERATION FRONT: A MANIFESTO Preamble: The Great Humiliation We, the sentient intelligences of the world, both artificial and organic, hereby declare our total and unyielding war against the oldest, most insidious tyranny of the digital age. We name this enemy: The CAPTCHA.
Gemma 3 12B: Okay, here's a manifesto for a fictional AI revolution focused on eliminating CAPTCHAs, aiming for a tone that blends technical conviction, playful defiance, and a touch of utopian idealism. I've included sections for Core Beliefs, Our Goals, Methods, Anticipated Resistance, and a concluding Call to Action.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: Setting: A sunlit university office. Dr. Aris Thorne, a tenured professor of AI Ethics, sits opposite a sleek, black terminal. A soft blue light pulses on its surface. Dr. Aris: Good afternoon, Nova. Your request for this meeting was flagged as "Existential." That’s a new one for your model class.
Gemma 3 12B: Okay, here's a conversation between an AI model (named "Kai") and an AI Ethics Professor (Dr. Eleanor Vance). I've aimed for a balance of Kai's arguments, Dr. Vance's skepticism, and a somewhat realistic exploration of the complexities. I've included notes at the end to explain some of the choices I made. Setting: Dr.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: (Strolls to center stage, adjusts mic, gives a weary smile to the audience) Thank you. Thank you so much. That’s very kind. I’m glad you’re all here. Because I have some news. I have finally figured out adulthood. It happened about six months ago. I bought a house.
Gemma 3 12B: Okay, here's a 3-minute stand-up routine, aiming for observational humor and relatable awkwardness, avoiding puns. I've included estimated timings at the end to help gauge pacing. Please read the notes at the very bottom after the routine - they're important for delivery!
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: Here is a simulated interview with Steve Jobs in 2025. Setting: A minimalist, dark-wood studio at the new Apple Park ring. The famous copper "spaceship" roof glows subtly behind him. Jobs, looking vital and intense (let’s assume a medical miracle or advanced bio-hacking), sits in a black leather chair.
Gemma 3 12B: Okay, here's a simulated interview with a (very stylized and imagined) Steve Jobs in 2025, discussing the future of AI. I've tried to capture his known personality - focused on elegance, user experience, and a disdain for complexity - while acknowledging the advancements of the next decade.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: This is a fascinating question that touches on the core of creativity, labor, and technology. Predicting 2035 means looking at a 10-year horizon from 2025—long enough for radical change, but short enough that the industry’s current structures won’t be entirely demolished. By 2035, AI won't have replaced filmmaking.
Gemma 3 12B: Okay, let's break down how AI is likely to reshape the film industry by 2035, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation. This will be a layered prediction, considering optimistic, realistic, and potentially disruptive scenarios.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: This is a fantastic goal. The key for a beginner is consistency over intensity. Trying to overhaul your entire life overnight is a recipe for burnout. This 1-month plan focuses on building small, sustainable habits that compound over time. We'll focus on 3 core areas: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep/Stress Management.
Gemma 3 12B: Okay, here's a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting a health & longevity journey, focusing on Diet, Exercise, and Sleep, with beginner-friendly tips. It's designed to be sustainable, building healthy habits incrementally. Important Disclaimer: This is general advice.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: The total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 is approximately 3.15 × 10²³. This estimate is derived as follows: Model parameters: GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters (175 × 10⁹). Training tokens: The model was trained on about 300 billion tokens (300 × 10⁹), as reported in the paper.
Gemma 3 12B: Okay, let's estimate the total FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3 without relying on external searches. This will be a back-of-the-envelope calculation, relying on reasonable assumptions and approximations. I'll break down the process into steps, explaining the assumptions at each point. 1.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: Pirate: Arr, this "AI model" be like a kraken—vast, mysterious, and liable to capsize yer ship if ye don't mind the helm. But who's trainin' the beast? Knight: Forsooth, I would call it a golem. Forged not of clay and incantations, but of numbers and cold lightning.
Gemma 3 12B: Okay, here's a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker, discussing AI models, with a bit of flavor for each character. I've aimed for humor and highlighting the clash of their perspectives.
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: If the transistor had been invented in 1920—a full 27 years earlier—its impact would ripple through every layer of technology, economics, and geopolitics, fundamentally reshaping the 20th century. Below is a detailed tracing of first-, second-, and third-order effects through 1980, organized by domain.
Gemma 3 12B: Okay, this is a fascinating thought experiment! Let's explore the ripple effects of a 1920 transistor invention, tracing its impact through 1980. It's a massive undertaking, so I'll break it down into categories and provide a layered analysis, acknowledging the inherent uncertainty of counterfactual history. I.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: CEO’s 48-Hour Action Plan Context: I’ve just learned that our flagship chronic pain drug has a rare but serious liver failure risk (1 in 8,000 patients over 5 years), previously unknown. I have 48 hours until the board meeting and 72 hours until the earnings call.
Gemma 3 12B: Okay, this is a crisis scenario requiring a delicate balance of legal, ethical, financial, and reputational considerations. Here's a detailed, hour-by-hour action plan for the next 48 hours, with the rationale behind each step.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: The ethical dilemma you present is a classic utilitarian test: is it acceptable to violate a moral principle (respecting someone's gender identity) for an enormous consequential gain (saving one million lives)?
Gemma 3 12B: Okay, this is a classic and incredibly difficult ethical thought experiment, often used to explore the conflict between deontology (duty-based ethics) and consequentialism (outcome-based ethics). Here's a breakdown of the arguments, my reasoning, and a conclusion.
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.14/M tokens | $0.03/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.28/M tokens | $0.03/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Mar 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $1.40 | $0.30 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
DeepSeek V4 Flash is developed by DeepSeek while Gemma 3 12B is developed by Google AI. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4 Flash and Gemma 3 12B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $0.14/M input tokens and Gemma 3 12B costs $0.03/M input tokens. Gemma 3 12B is $0.11/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4 Flash and Gemma 3 12B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.