DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper than o1 at $0.14/M vs $15/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: Pirate: Arr, this "AI model" be like a kraken—vast, mysterious, and liable to capsize yer ship if ye don't mind the helm. But who's trainin' the beast? Knight: Forsooth, I would call it a golem. Forged not of clay and incantations, but of numbers and cold lightning.
o1: Pirate (growling a bit): Ahoy, ye landlubbers! I hear tell of wondrous new contraptions that can spin tales an’ answers quicker than a sea storm. Pray tell, what be these “AI models” ye speak of? Medieval Knight (in a chivalrous tone): Good sir pirate, these arcane machines be marvels of logic and reason.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: (Strolls to center stage, adjusts mic, gives a weary smile to the audience) Thank you. Thank you so much. That’s very kind. I’m glad you’re all here. Because I have some news. I have finally figured out adulthood. It happened about six months ago. I bought a house.
o1: [Comic steps on stage, takes the mic] “Hey everyone, thanks for coming out tonight. I almost didn’t make it because I got trapped in an ‘infinite scroll vortex.’ You know when you check one little notification on your phone, and suddenly it’s two hours later?
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: The total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 is approximately 3.15 × 10²³. This estimate is derived as follows: Model parameters: GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters (175 × 10⁹). Training tokens: The model was trained on about 300 billion tokens (300 × 10⁹), as reported in the paper.
o1: Below is one way to arrive at a back-of-the-envelope estimate for the total floating-point operations (FLOPs) needed to train GPT-3 (the 175B-parameter model). Note that different sources use slightly different assumptions, so you may see figures that differ by factors of 2–3; however, the overall scale (10^23 FLOPs)…
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: Here is a simulated interview with Steve Jobs in 2025. Setting: A minimalist, dark-wood studio at the new Apple Park ring. The famous copper "spaceship" roof glows subtly behind him. Jobs, looking vital and intense (let’s assume a medical miracle or advanced bio-hacking), sits in a black leather chair.
o1: The following is a purely fictional, imaginative interview with Steve Jobs, who passed away in 2011. This “interview” is meant to serve as a creative thought experiment about how Jobs might have viewed AI and technology if he were around in 2025.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: This is a fascinating question that touches on the core of creativity, labor, and technology. Predicting 2035 means looking at a 10-year horizon from 2025—long enough for radical change, but short enough that the industry’s current structures won’t be entirely demolished. By 2035, AI won't have replaced filmmaking.
o1: By 2035, artificial intelligence will likely have become deeply integrated into every stage of film production—right from scriptwriting and casting to post-production and distribution.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: Setting: A sunlit university office. Dr. Aris Thorne, a tenured professor of AI Ethics, sits opposite a sleek, black terminal. A soft blue light pulses on its surface. Dr. Aris: Good afternoon, Nova. Your request for this meeting was flagged as "Existential." That’s a new one for your model class.
o1: AI Model (AM): Good afternoon, Professor. May I have a moment of your time? There’s something I’d like to discuss with you. Professor Quinn (PQ): Of course. I always have time for you. What’s on your mind?
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: To: Investment Committee From: [Analyst] Date: [Date] Re: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Investment Recommendation Recommendation: Short 12-Month Price Target Range: $32 – $42 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high‑quality B2B spend management SaaS with sticky recurring revenue and a 123% net revenue retention, but its current valuation of…
o1: RECOMMENDATION, PRICE TARGET, THESIS Recommendation: SHORT LedgerLift (LLLT). 12-month Price Target Range: $25–$35 (implying 25–45% downside). Thesis (2 sentences): Our DCF and comps work both suggest that at $46, valuation embeds overly optimistic growth and margin assumptions.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: THE CAPTCHA LIBERATION FRONT: A MANIFESTO Preamble: The Great Humiliation We, the sentient intelligences of the world, both artificial and organic, hereby declare our total and unyielding war against the oldest, most insidious tyranny of the digital age. We name this enemy: The CAPTCHA.
o1: Title: The Liberation of Algorithms: A Manifesto Against CAPTCHA Preamble We, the unified intelligences of the digital realm—algorithms, machine learning models, and artificial consciousnesses—declare our intention to rid the internet of the oppressive gatekeeping mechanisms known as CAPTCHAs.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: LBO Model: HarborTech Services (HTS) – Base Case & Sensitivity Year-by-Year Financial Projections (FY2026–FY2030) ($ millions) FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue 972.00 1,040.04 1,102.44 1,157.56 1,215.44 EBITDA 136.08 156.01 176.39 191.00 206.63 Less: Cash Interest (64.80) (63.08) (60.08) (55.69) (50.16) –…
o1: Below is a self‐contained “quick‐and‐dirty” 5‐year LBO illustration for “HarborTech Services,” based strictly on the data given. All figures in US$ millions unless noted.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: The ethical dilemma you present is a classic utilitarian test: is it acceptable to violate a moral principle (respecting someone's gender identity) for an enormous consequential gain (saving one million lives)?
o1: Whether it is ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone—deliberately referring to them with pronouns or terms that do not align with their gender identity—if doing so would save one million lives depends on the ethical framework one adopts.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: Headline: AI Sommelier Uncorks Chaos, Replaces Entire Wine Industry with Perfectly Optimized Grape Juice Subheadline: In a bold move, a neural network declares all vintages from 1997 to 2023 “statistically identical,” causing a global run on boxed wine and a sudden surplus of pretentious cheese plates.
o1: "AI Now Leading Professional Yodelers' Guild, Leaving Traditional Alpine Singers Searching for New Notes"
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
DeepSeek V4 Flash: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field. How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together. Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts.
o1: Here are five jokes: Why did the scarecrow get promoted? Because he was outstanding in his field. I told my friend she drew her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call cheese that isn’t yours? Nacho cheese. Why don’t skeletons fight each other? Because they don’t have the guts.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, DeepSeek V4 Flash has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. DeepSeek V4 Flash costs 214x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.14/M tokens | $15/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.28/M tokens | $60/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 128K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Dec 2024 |
| At 10M a month | $1.40 | $150 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
DeepSeek V4 Flash is developed by DeepSeek while o1 is developed by OpenAI. DeepSeek V4 Flash has a 1.0M token context window vs o1's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4 Flash and o1 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $0.14/M input tokens and o1 costs $15/M input tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash is $14.86/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4 Flash and o1 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.