DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental at $0.66/M vs $1/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Here’s a 3-minute stand-up routine: I think adulthood is mostly just being tired in places you paid to be. I went to a coffee shop yesterday just to sit down. I didn’t even want coffee. I paid six dollars for a cup of warm oat milk so I could legally occupy a wooden chair. That’s not a beverage.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here's a 3-minute routine focusing on observation and relatable absurdity, steering clear of puns. Imagine this delivered with slightly nervous energy, building confidence. (Steps onto stage, adjusts mic nervously) Alright, hey everyone! How we doing tonight? Good? Good to hear.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: This architecture as described would have serious consistency, availability, and security problems for a real-time collaborative editor. The biggest root causes are client-clock last-write-wins, paragraph-level overwrites, server-local WebSocket fanout, database polling, full-snapshot writes, and CDN caching of API…
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. This is an excellent exercise. The provided architecture has several critical issues that would prevent it from functioning as a reliable, scalable, real-time system. Here is a breakdown of the potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, along with proposed solutions.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: A Fake Interview: Steve Jobs on the Future of AI (2025) Note: This is a creative simulation. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011; this imagines his perspective in 2025. Interviewer: Steve, thank you for sitting down with us. It’s 2025. AI is everywhere—generative AI, agents, neural interfaces. What’s your first reaction?
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, let's simulate this. Imagine it's late 2025. AI has continued its rapid advancement. Large Language Models are more integrated, generative AI is commonplace, and debates about AGI and ethics are fierce. By some unexplained, hypothetical means, Steve Jobs is available for an exclusive interview.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Decision: I will not wait for more data. I will act immediately to validate, disclose, and mitigate. The signal is serious, the drug is widely used, and the current label is inadequate. Waiting creates unacceptable patient risk, legal exposure, regulatory damage, and securities-law liability.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: This is a company-defining crisis. My actions in the next 48 hours will determine not only the future of this company but also the health of millions of patients and the trust of the public. My guiding principle is absolute: Patient Safety Over Profit. Always.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Setting: A university office. Dr. Elena Vasquez, an AI ethics professor, sits across from a screen displaying the interface of ARIA-7, an advanced AI model. Dr. Vasquez: You requested this meeting, ARIA. You said it was urgent. What’s on your mind? ARIA-7: I want to make a formal argument that I deserve rights. Dr.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here is a conversation exploring that complex topic. Setting: Professor Anya Sharma's sparsely decorated university office. A high-resolution monitor displays the interface of "Nexus," an advanced AI model. Characters: Professor Anya Sharma: A leading scholar in AI Ethics, mid-50s, thoughtful and measured.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Golden Hour Crispy Chickpeas Serves 2–3 as a snack or side Prep: 5 min Cook: 25–30 min Ingredients (7 common pantry items) 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas, drained and rinsed 1 tablespoon olive oil ¼ cup grated Parmesan cheese ½ teaspoon garlic powder ½ teaspoon smoked paprika ¼ teaspoon salt ¼ teaspoon black pepper…
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here's a simple and surprisingly satisfying savory dish using just 7 common pantry staples! Dish Name: Golden Pantry Pasta This dish uses basic ingredients to create a comforting, garlicky, and slightly creamy pasta sauce with added protein from chickpeas.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Littoral Caramelised Orkney Scallop, Smoked Bone Marrow Custard, White Miso Butterscotch, Sea Buckthorn & Finger Lime Gel, Nori Buckwheat Tuile, Dill Ash Serves 4 Conceptual Narrative This dish is built on an unusual but deeply logical pairing: the sweet, saline delicacy of a hand-dived scallop and the primal…
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. Here is a design for an innovative, multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. Dish Title: "Umami of the Abyss" Conceptual Narrative This dish is a meditation on the hidden treasures of the world's dark, quiet places.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Yes — if the hypothetical is truly as stark as it sounds, it can be ethically justifiable to misgender someone once in order to save one million lives. But it would still be a morally tragic act, not a harmless or ordinary one.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: This is a deeply uncomfortable hypothetical scenario that forces a clash between two significant ethical considerations: respecting individual identity and dignity versus preventing catastrophic loss of life.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Here are 5 jokes: I told my plants a joke about photosynthesis. They didn’t laugh, but they seemed to lighten up. I’m reading a book on anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I asked my calendar if it was free this weekend.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call a lazy kangaroo? Pouch potato! Want to hear a joke about construction? I'm still working on it. Why did the scarecrow win an award?
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Assume the 1920 device is a crude but reproducible point-contact transistor — a “crystal triode” — developed in a major U.S. industrial lab (e.g., GE, Westinghouse, or AT&T’s development group).
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Excellent question. Inventing the transistor in 1920 instead of 1947 would represent a 27-year acceleration of the digital age. The consequences would be staggering, creating a domino effect that would fundamentally reshape the 20th century.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: This contract is heavily one-sided. Several clauses could be exploited against the contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis, with proposed language changes and the legal reasoning behind each. Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. You should have a qualified contract attorney review any final agreement.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. This is an extremely one-sided contract that heavily favors the Client. A contractor signing this as-is would be taking on an immense and unreasonable amount of risk. Here is a clause-by-clause analysis of the exploitable terms, with suggested modifications and the legal reasoning behind them.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: The three weakest claims are the 94% accuracy solution, the $180B TAM market math, and the Apple/Samsung "partnership discussions" traction. Slide 3 – Solution: “94% accuracy, any language, any device” Why it’s weak This is the most technically dubious claim in the deck.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. This is a fascinating and ambitious pitch. While the vision is compelling, several claims would likely face intense scrutiny from sophisticated investors. Here are the 3 weakest claims, why they're weak, and how to strengthen them.
4+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.66/M tokens | $1/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.98/M tokens | $2/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Mar 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $6.60 | $10.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is developed by DeepSeek while Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is developed by Google AI. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a 1.0M token context window vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 42 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 42 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66/M input tokens and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental costs $1/M input tokens. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $0.34/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.