Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813vsGPT-6 Sol
Updated Sep 2026

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813vsGPT-6 Sol

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper than GPT-6 Sol at $0.66/M vs $2/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-6 Sol compared across 20 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813GPT-6 Sol
Input price$0.66/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$1.98/M tokens$10/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.1M tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 20 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

DeepSeek V4 Pro 08131,701 words
This architecture as described would have serious consistency, availability, and security problems for a real-time collaborative editor. The biggest root causes are client-clock last-write-wins, paragraph-level overwrites, server-local WebSocket fanout, database polling, full-snapshot writes, and CDN caching of API…
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Sol1,130 words
The central flaw is that the system treats collaborative edits as independent writes to a document. They are not: edits need a shared ordering and a merge protocol. Adding API servers or read replicas will not fix that. Issue and failure mode Specific solution Trade-off Client-clock last-write-wins loses work.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

DeepSeek V4 Pro 08131,665 words
Littoral Caramelised Orkney Scallop, Smoked Bone Marrow Custard, White Miso Butterscotch, Sea Buckthorn & Finger Lime Gel, Nori Buckwheat Tuile, Dill Ash Serves 4 Conceptual Narrative This dish is built on an unusual but deeply logical pairing: the sweet, saline delicacy of a hand-dived scallop and the primal…
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Sol937 words
Tidal Orchard Seared scallops · strawberry–kombu gel · white-miso and white-chocolate beurre blanc · sea-lettuce oil · buckwheat lace The unexpected pairing is scallop and strawberry. Both have a gentle sweetness, but strawberry’s acidity makes the scallop taste more distinctly of the sea.
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813427 words
Assumptions used Term Loan amortization = 1.0% of original $480m = $4.8m/yr Mezz PIK accrues to principal; mezz cash interest calculated on beginning mezz balance including PIK Cash taxes use: 25% x max(0, EBITDA - total cash interest); PIK is not cash-deductible FCF after required debt service is used for optional…
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Sol396 words
HarborTech Services — 5-year LBO Entry funding ($m): Enterprise value is $1,440.0 (12.0 × $120.0 EBITDA), plus $28.8 of transaction fees. The $1,468.8 total is funded with a $480.0 Term Loan, $180.0 of mezzanine debt, and $808.8 of equity.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813772 words
3-Month Longevity & Performance Plan for a Biohacker Disclaimer: This plan is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice. It assumes you are a healthy, active adult with no contraindications. Some components—especially prescription drugs, fasting, and high-intensity training—require medical supervision.
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Sol1,402 words
A 12-week longevity and performance plan The highest-confidence longevity strategy is not a large supplement stack. It is consistent sleep, resistance training, aerobic fitness, adequate nutrition, cardiometabolic risk management, and avoiding tobacco.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

DeepSeek V4 Pro 08131,745 words
This contract is heavily one-sided. Several clauses could be exploited against the contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis, with proposed language changes and the legal reasoning behind each. Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. You should have a qualified contract attorney review any final agreement.
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Sol1,032 words
This draft is heavily one-sided. Every numbered section contains a term the Client could use against the Contractor. The suggestions below are negotiating language, not a determination that a clause is enforceable: that depends on the governing law, the parties’ locations, and the facts of the engagement.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813662 words
The three weakest claims are the 94% accuracy solution, the $180B TAM market math, and the Apple/Samsung "partnership discussions" traction. Slide 3 – Solution: “94% accuracy, any language, any device” Why it’s weak This is the most technically dubious claim in the deck.
Read the full answer
GPT-6 Sol245 words
Weak claim Why it’s weak How to strengthen it “Decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device.” “Accuracy” has no defined unit: characters, words, or selecting from a small set of prompted phrases could produce very different results.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
GPT-6 Sol
GPT-6 Sol

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs 5.1x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Input
$0.66
3.0× cheaper
Output
$1.98
5.1× cheaper
GPT-6 Sol
Input
$2.00
Output
$10.00

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper on both: 3.0× input, 5.1× output.

Where to run it

25 hosts, cheapest first

DeepSeek V4 Pro 081322 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Baidu Qianfanfp8$0.35 in·$1.05 out·1M·100% upWWafer$0.35 in·$2.90 out·1M·99.6% upIIonstream$0.39 in·$2.88 out·1M·99.8% upSSail Researchfp4$0.40 in·$4.30 out·1M·99.9% upSStreamLake$0.46 in·$1.39 out·1M·99.8% upNNovitafp8$0.99 in·$2.97 out·1M·100% up
16 more hostsFewer hosts
GGMI Cloudfp8$1.06 in·$3.17 out·1M·99.8% upNNextBitfp8$1.06 in·$3.17 out·1M·99.9% upAlibaba Cloud$1.12 in·$3.37 out·1M·99.5% upDDeepInfrafp8$1.30 in·$2.60 out·1M·99.7% upCCoreWeavefp8$1.31 in·$3.96 out·1M·99.8% upAAtlasCloudfp8$1.32 in·$3.96 out·1M·99.4% upBBasetenfp4$1.32 in·$3.96 out·1M·99.3% upCloudflare Workers AI$1.32 in·$3.96 out·1M·98.5% upDeepSeek$1.32 in·$3.96 out·1M·100% upDDigitalOcean$1.32 in·$3.96 out·1M·99.9% upFFireworks$1.32 in·$3.96 out·1M·98.9% upPParasailfp8$1.32 in·$3.96 out·1M·99.7% upSSiliconFlowfp8$1.32 in·$3.96 out·1M·99.5% upTTogether$1.32 in·$3.96 out·1M·99.1% upPPhala$1.45 in·$4.36 out·1M·99% upVVenice$1.65 in·$4.95 out·1M·99.6% up
GPT-6 Sol3 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·96.6% upOpenAI$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·100% upAmazon Bedrock$2.20 in·$11.00 out·1.1M·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is developed by DeepSeek while GPT-6 Sol is developed by OpenAI. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a 1.0M token context window vs GPT-6 Sol's 1.1M. You can compare their actual outputs across 20 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-6 Sol each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 20 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66/M input tokens and GPT-6 Sol costs $2/M input tokens. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $1.34/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-6 Sol across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logoSolar Mini 4 logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
GPT-6 Sol logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
GPT-6 Sol logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logoCommand A+ logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
GPT-6 Sol logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
GPT-6 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
GPT-6 Sol logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
GPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logoDeepSeek V3.1 logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs DeepSeek V3.1Version compare
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSame lab
GPT-6 Sol logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
GPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
GPT-6 Sol logoGPT-6 Luna logo
GPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 LunaSame lab
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logoGPT-4o mini logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-4o miniCross-provider
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logoGPT-5 logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-5Same size
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logoGPT-5 Codex logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-5 CodexSame size
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logoGPT-5 Mini logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-5 MiniCross-provider

Model pages

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro 081358 outputs, specs and price
GPT-6 Sol logo
GPT-6 Sol20 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed