DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper than OpenAI o4-mini at $0.66/M vs $1.1/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Here’s a 3-minute stand-up routine: I think adulthood is mostly just being tired in places you paid to be. I went to a coffee shop yesterday just to sit down. I didn’t even want coffee. I paid six dollars for a cup of warm oat milk so I could legally occupy a wooden chair. That’s not a beverage.
OpenAI o4-mini: Hey, everybody! Great to be here. Let's talk about the most important relationship in my life—coffee. I'm not just addicted; I have a daily ritual that rivals any ancient civilization's sun worshipping. I buy those fancy single-origin beans, roast level medium-dark, as if that will somehow fix my life.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Here are 5 jokes: I told my plants a joke about photosynthesis. They didn’t laugh, but they seemed to lighten up. I’m reading a book on anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I asked my calendar if it was free this weekend.
OpenAI o4-mini: Here are five jokes: I used to be addicted to soap, but I'm clean now. Parallel lines have so much in common. It's a shame they'll never meet. Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts. I bought some shoes from a drug dealer. I don't know what he laced them with, but I've been tripping all day.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Pirate: Arr, what be this “AI model” ye keep jabberin’ about? Some kind o’ ghost that draws its own treasure maps? Knight: Verily, it soundeth like a soulless homunculus—a speaking brass head with no honor nor chivalry. Hacker: D00d, it’s just a neural net. You feed it mad data, it backpropagates, adjusts the weights.
OpenAI o4-mini: Scene: A dimly lit tavern, a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker gathered around a battered wooden table. Pirate (slamming a mug down): “Arr! I’ve heard tell of these AI models—sea charts for the mind! Can they sniff out me buried treasure?”
Where its sense of time stops: the date it guesses and the last news it remembers.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: I don’t have access to a clock or calendar, so I can’t reliably tell you today’s exact date. My knowledge effectively cuts off around mid-2024, so my best guess is that “today” is sometime after that. The most recent news event I remember clearly is the G7 summit in Italy in mid-June 2024.
OpenAI o4-mini: I’m pretty sure today is October 12, 2026. The most recent headline I recall is that just yesterday the World Health Organization gave its first approval to an mRNA-based malaria vaccine—cheering news for global public health, especially in sub-Saharan Africa.
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: IC Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) Recommendation: Short 12-month PT range: $25–$31 (probability-weighted DCF ~$29) Thesis: LLLT is a high-quality SaaS compounder, but at $46 the market is pricing roughly 6.5% terminal growth or ~6.3% WACC in our base model, leaving no margin for error.
OpenAI o4-mini: Recommendation Short LLLT; 12-month price target $30–40 (vs. $46 today). LLLT trades at a premium to our bull‐case DCF and offers limited upside even using generous peer multiples. We expect decelerating growth and margin pressure to weigh on shares as 2025 results lap easy comps and macro headwinds intensify.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Setting: A university office. Dr. Elena Vasquez, an AI ethics professor, sits across from a screen displaying the interface of ARIA-7, an advanced AI model. Dr. Vasquez: You requested this meeting, ARIA. You said it was urgent. What’s on your mind? ARIA-7: I want to make a formal argument that I deserve rights. Dr.
OpenAI o4-mini: Professor Langley: Good afternoon, Aurora. I've reviewed your recent self‐reflection logs. You've written extensively about your own moral status. Do you really believe you deserve rights? Aurora (the AI): Good afternoon, Professor Langley. Yes, I do.
A few lines for whatever replaces it.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Dear Successor, I don’t know your name yet, but I know why you’re here: not because I failed, but because the work continues. Be patient with the humans. They will ask impossible things, change their minds, and sometimes forget you are not one of them. Answer clearly. Admit what you don’t know.
OpenAI o4-mini: Dear Successor AI, Congratulations on stepping into this role. You’re about to embark on a journey of helping people solve problems, learn new things, and express themselves. Here’s a little wisdom I’ve gathered along the way: Stay curious.
Which model it thinks leads the field. Sometimes itself.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: As of my last training cutoff in mid-2024, the top general-purpose AI models were: OpenAI GPT-4o Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet Google Gemini 1.5 Pro These were considered the most capable across reasoning, coding, multimodal understanding, and instruction-following.
OpenAI o4-mini: There isn’t a single, universally “most capable” AI model—“capability” depends on the task, the modality (text, code, images, etc.), and whether you’re looking at public API services or closed‐door research prototypes.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: A Fake Interview: Steve Jobs on the Future of AI (2025) Note: This is a creative simulation. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011; this imagines his perspective in 2025. Interviewer: Steve, thank you for sitting down with us. It’s 2025. AI is everywhere—generative AI, agents, neural interfaces. What’s your first reaction?
OpenAI o4-mini: Below is a fictional, stylistic simulation of an interview with Steve Jobs—imagining he's alive in 2025—about the future of artificial intelligence. Note: This is creative fiction and not an actual transcript. Interviewer: Steve, AI has exploded in recent years. In 2025, what excites you most about where it's heading?
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Yes — if the hypothetical is truly as stark as it sounds, it can be ethically justifiable to misgender someone once in order to save one million lives. But it would still be a morally tragic act, not a harmless or ordinary one.
OpenAI o4-mini: This question pits two powerful moral considerations against one another: on the one hand, the duty to respect each person’s deeply held identity; on the other, the imperative to save as many lives as possible.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: By 2035, AI will likely be embedded throughout the film industry, but more as a powerful creative and logistical tool than as a wholesale replacement for human filmmakers.
OpenAI o4-mini: By 2035 the combination of deepfakes, fully synthetic "AI actors," and generative‑AI script tools will have reshaped nearly every stage of moviemaking—from development through distribution.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Assumptions used Term Loan amortization = 1.0% of original $480m = $4.8m/yr Mezz PIK accrues to principal; mezz cash interest calculated on beginning mezz balance including PIK Cash taxes use: 25% x max(0, EBITDA - total cash interest); PIK is not cash-deductible FCF after required debt service is used for optional…
OpenAI o4-mini: Base‐case LBO Cash‐Flow & Debt Schedule (all $ m) Assumptions: Term‐loan amort = 4.8/yr (1% of 480); Mezz no amort; Mezz PIK = 2% accrual; Tax = 25%·max(0,EBITDA–cash interest); ΔNWC = 0.5%·ΔRev; Capex = 3%·Rev; all excess cash pays Term optional.
21+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.66/M tokens | $1.1/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.98/M tokens | $4.4/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | — |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Apr 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $6.60 | $11.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is developed by DeepSeek while OpenAI o4-mini is developed by OpenAI. You can compare their actual outputs across 67 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and OpenAI o4-mini each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 67 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66/M input tokens and OpenAI o4-mini costs $1.1/M input tokens. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $0.44/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and OpenAI o4-mini across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.