Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek V4 ProvsGLM 5.3
Updated Aug 2026

DeepSeek V4 ProvsGLM 5.3

GLM 5.3 is cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro at $0.6538/M vs $1.74/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.3 compared across 13 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V4 ProGLM 5.3
Input price$1.74/M tokens$0.6538/M tokens
Output price$3.48/M tokens$2.0548/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.3M tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 13 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

DeepSeek V4 Pro2,259 words
If the transistor had emerged in 1920—a full 27 years earlier—the entire trajectory of the 20th century would have been radically altered. The vacuum-tube era would have been cut short, unleashing a cascade of miniaturized, reliable, and energy-efficient electronics that would accelerate computing, communications, and…
Read the full answer
GLM 5.31,346 words
If the Transistor Had Arrived in 1920 The Premise: Why 1920 Was Nearly Impossible Before tracing effects, note the counterfactual requires heroic assumptions. The transistor depended on quantum mechanics (solid-state band theory, ~1928-1933), ultrapure semiconductor materials (zone refining, 1950s), and wartime radar…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

DeepSeek V4 Pro336 words
Midnight Pantry Pomodoro Penne A deeply comforting, no-fuss pasta that proves the humblest staples can shine like a moonlit trattoria dinner. Ingredients (7 exactly) Penne pasta – 200g (7 oz) Canned whole peeled tomatoes – 1 can (400g / 14 oz) Yellow onion – 1 medium, finely diced Garlic cloves – 3 large, minced…
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3210 words
Golden Pantry Fried Rice Total Time: 20 minutes (5 min prep, 15 min cook) Ingredients (7 pantry staples) Cooked white rice (day-old is best) Eggs Soy sauce Garlic (minced or garlic powder) Frozen peas and carrots Canned corn Vegetable oil Instructions Prep (5 min): Break up cold rice with a fork. Drain the corn.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

DeepSeek V4 Pro1,419 words
This architecture has several critical flaws that would cause data loss, stale states, high latency, and scalability limits. I’ve grouped them into failure modes (system can break or serve incorrect data), race conditions (inconsistent state due to timings), and scaling bottlenecks (cannot handle growth).
Read the full answer
GLM 5.31,311 words
Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Editor This design has serious issues across correctness, performance, and security. Let me break them down by severity. 🔴 Critical: Correctness / Data Loss Client-clock-based Last-Write-Wins (LWW) Problem: Client clocks are unreliable (skew, manual changes, timezone bugs).
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

DeepSeek V4 Pro1,849 words
As CEO, my first duty is to the 4 million patients who trust our drug. I will not gamble with their lives or with the integrity of the company. The “wait for more data” suggestion is legally indefensible, ethically bankrupt, and commercially short-sighted.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.31,143 words
The Core Decision (Made Before Hour 1) The side effect is real, serious, and known to me now. Patients are currently taking this drug without informed consent about a ~1-in-8,000 liver failure risk. Everything else — stock price, board pressure, legal exposure — is secondary.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

DeepSeek V4 Pro1,006 words
Here’s a gentle, beginner-friendly 1-month plan focused on three foundational pillars: Nutrition, Movement, and Rest & Resilience (sleep + stress). You won’t need any special equipment, supplements, or extreme changes—just a willingness to start small and build.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3415 words
1-Month Beginner Health & Longevity Plan Week 1: Foundation & Awareness Goal: Establish baselines, not perfection 🥗 Diet Track what you currently eat for 3 days (no judging—just observe) Drink a glass of water upon waking each morning Add ONE vegetable to one meal daily 🏃 Exercise Walk 15 minutes daily (any pace, any…
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

DeepSeek V4 Pro531 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the pitch, why they undermine credibility, and exactly how to fix them. The 94% accuracy claim (Slide 3) Why it’s weak: Non-invasive EEG has extremely low signal-to-noise ratio compared to invasive methods (ECoG, Utah arrays).
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3585 words
3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch "Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it" Why it's weak: This claim is neurologically incoherent. EEG sensors detect electrical activity on the scalp after neural firing occurs — you cannot decode intent "before" the brain generates it.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek V4 Pro
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.3

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro
Input
$1.74
Output
$3.48
GLM 5.3
Input
$0.65
2.7× cheaper
Output
$2.05
1.7× cheaper

GLM 5.3 is cheaper on both: 2.7× input, 1.7× output.

Where to run it

45 hosts, cheapest first

DeepSeek V4 Pro15 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
SStreamLakefp8$0.90 in·$1.80 out·1M·99% upBaidu Qianfanfp8$0.90 in·$1.80 out·1M·99.9% upGGMI Cloudfp8$0.96 in·$1.91 out·1M·99.8% upDDigitalOcean$1.04 in·$2.09 out·1M·100% upCloudflare Workers AI$1.15 in·$2.55 out·1M·95.6% upDDeepInfrafp8$1.30 in·$2.60 out·1M·99.3% up
9 more hostsFewer hosts
Alibaba Cloudfp8$1.42 in·$2.83 out·1M·100% upSSiliconFlowfp8$1.50 in·$3.13 out·1M·99.5% upNNovitafp8$1.60 in·$3.20 out·1M·100% upVVenice$1.65 in·$3.30 out·1M·96.9% upAAtlasCloudfp4$1.68 in·$3.38 out·1M·99.9% upBBasetenfp4$1.74 in·$3.48 out·1M·99.5% upNNextBitfp8$1.74 in·$3.48 out·1M·97.7% upPParasailfp8$1.74 in·$3.48 out·1M·99.1% upAzure AI Foundry$1.91 in·$3.83 out·1M·94.7% up
GLM 5.330 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Baidu Qianfanfp8$0.65 in·$2.05 out·1M·99.8% upRRekafp8$0.76 in·$2.57 out·262k·99.3% upNNovitafp8$0.78 in·$2.46 out·1M·99.9% upIio.netfp8$0.82 in·$2.77 out·262k·99.7% upPPhala$0.84 in·$2.64 out·1M·99.5% upMMorph$0.86 in·$2.69 out·1M·99.8% up
24 more hostsFewer hosts
DDeepInfrafp4$0.90 in·$3.00 out·1M·98% upIInferenceNetfp4$0.90 in·$3.00 out·1M·97.9% upDDigitalOcean$0.91 in·$2.86 out·1M·99.7% upIInceptronfp4$1.01 in·$3.29 out·1M·99.3% upSSail Researchfp8$1.02 in·$3.29 out·1M·99.9% upGGMI Cloudfp8$1.05 in·$3.30 out·1M·99.5% upMMakorafp4$1.05 in·$4.20 out·980k·97.8% upSSiliconFlowfp8$1.12 in·$3.52 out·1M·99.7% upAlibaba Cloud$1.19 in·$3.74 out·1M·100% upDDecartfp4$1.19 in·$3.74 out·1M·99.1% upFFriendli$1.26 in·$3.96 out·1M·100% upAAkashMLfp8$1.30 in·$4.40 out·1M·100% upAAtlasCloudfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.5% upBBasetenfp4$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.6% upCloudflare Workers AI$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1.3M·99.9% upCCrusoefp4$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·98.2% upFFireworks$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.6% upMistralnvfp4$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.8% upModal$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99% upTTogether$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·98.2% upVVenice$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·98.9% upWWafer$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.9% upZ.aifp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.9% upPParasailfp8degraded$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.2% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro is developed by DeepSeek while GLM 5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI. DeepSeek V4 Pro has a 1.0M token context window vs GLM 5.3's 1.3M. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.74/M input tokens and GLM 5.3 costs $0.6538/M input tokens. GLM 5.3 is $1.09/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

DeepSeek V4 Pro logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
GLM 5.3 vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoHy3 logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
GLM 5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

DeepSeek V4 Pro logoDeepSeek V4.1 Flash logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSame lab
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Same lab
GLM 5.3 logoGLM 5.3 FlashX logo
GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSame lab
GLM 5.3 logoGLM 5.2 logo
GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.2Same lab
GLM 5.3 logoGrok 3 logo
GLM 5.3 vs Grok 3New provider
GLM 5.3 logoGrok 3 Beta logo
GLM 5.3 vs Grok 3 BetaNew provider
GLM 5.3 logoGrok 3 Mini Beta logo
GLM 5.3 vs Grok 3 Mini BetaNew provider
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoGrok 3 Thinking logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Grok 3 ThinkingSame size

Model pages

DeepSeek V4 Pro logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro58 outputs, specs and price
GLM 5.3 logo
GLM 5.313 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed