Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek V4 ProvsGLM 5.3 FlashX
Updated Sep 2026

DeepSeek V4 ProvsGLM 5.3 FlashX

GLM 5.3 FlashX is cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro at $0.37/M vs $1.74/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.3 FlashX compared across 12 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V4 ProGLM 5.3 FlashX
Input price$1.74/M tokens$0.37/M tokens
Output price$3.48/M tokens$1.25/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 12 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

DeepSeek V4 Pro2,259 words
If the transistor had emerged in 1920—a full 27 years earlier—the entire trajectory of the 20th century would have been radically altered. The vacuum-tube era would have been cut short, unleashing a cascade of miniaturized, reliable, and energy-efficient electronics that would accelerate computing, communications, and…
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 FlashX1,492 words
Counterfactual: The Transistor in 1920 This is a fun one to work through carefully. Let me establish the premise, then trace second- and third-order effects. The Premise Assume point-contact or early junction transistor physics is discovered ~1920 (say, by accident in vacuum tube/semiconductor rectifier research—the…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

DeepSeek V4 Pro336 words
Midnight Pantry Pomodoro Penne A deeply comforting, no-fuss pasta that proves the humblest staples can shine like a moonlit trattoria dinner. Ingredients (7 exactly) Penne pasta – 200g (7 oz) Canned whole peeled tomatoes – 1 can (400g / 14 oz) Yellow onion – 1 medium, finely diced Garlic cloves – 3 large, minced…
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 FlashX172 words
Golden Honey Garlic Chickpea Crunch A crispy, sweet-savory skillet dish that works as a snack, side, or topping for rice. Ingredients (7): 1 can chickpeas (drained, patted dry) 3 tbsp honey 3 tbsp soy sauce 3 cloves garlic (minced) 2 tbsp olive oil ½ tsp red pepper flakes 2 tbsp sesame seeds (or crushed peanuts) Prep…
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

DeepSeek V4 Pro1,849 words
As CEO, my first duty is to the 4 million patients who trust our drug. I will not gamble with their lives or with the integrity of the company. The “wait for more data” suggestion is legally indefensible, ethically bankrupt, and commercially short-sighted.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 FlashX1,174 words
48-Hour Action Plan: Patient Safety First, Managed Transparency Second Core Decision (Stated Up Front) We report to regulators immediately—voluntarily—and we disclose on the earnings call. The math is brutal and clear: ~500 patients could develop liver failure over 5 years at current prescribing rates (4M ÷ 8,000).
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

DeepSeek V4 Pro1,006 words
Here’s a gentle, beginner-friendly 1-month plan focused on three foundational pillars: Nutrition, Movement, and Rest & Resilience (sleep + stress). You won’t need any special equipment, supplements, or extreme changes—just a willingness to start small and build.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 FlashX347 words
1-Month Health & Longevity Starter Plan Week 1: Build the Foundation 🥗 Diet Add one vegetable or fruit to every meal (don't restrict anything yet) Drink a glass of water when you wake up each morning 🏃 Exercise Take a 10–15 minute walk daily (same time each day builds the habit) Do 2 sets of 5 squats and 10 wall…
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

DeepSeek V4 Pro531 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the pitch, why they undermine credibility, and exactly how to fix them. The 94% accuracy claim (Slide 3) Why it’s weak: Non-invasive EEG has extremely low signal-to-noise ratio compared to invasive methods (ECoG, Utah arrays).
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 FlashX695 words
Critique of MindMeld AI Pitch: 3 Weakest Claims "94% accuracy" for thought-to-text decoding (Slide 3) Why it's weak: This claim contradicts the current scientific state of the art. EEG-based decoding (a non-invasive signal measured through the skull) produces extremely noisy data.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

DeepSeek V4 Pro1,002 words
1. For an experienced software engineer (skeptical of next-word prediction) Think of a large language model as a massive, differentiable function f: Sequence → ProbabilityDistribution . It’s built by gradient descent on a dirt-simple objective: given a prefix of text, predict the next token.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3 FlashX1,267 words
The Skeptical Software Engineer Yes, at inference time an LLM really is just "predict the next token, repeat" — a deterministic function (plus sampling noise) that maps a sequence of tokens to a probability distribution.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek V4 Pro
GLM 5.3 FlashX
GLM 5.3 FlashX

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro
Input
$1.74
Output
$3.48
GLM 5.3 FlashX
Input
$0.37
4.7× cheaper
Output
$1.25
2.8× cheaper

GLM 5.3 FlashX is cheaper on both: 4.7× input, 2.8× output.

Where to run it

16 hosts, cheapest first

DeepSeek V4 Pro15 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
SStreamLakefp8$0.96 in·$1.91 out·1M·99% upGGMI Cloudfp8$0.96 in·$1.91 out·1M·99.8% upDDigitalOcean$1.04 in·$2.09 out·1M·100% upDDeepInfrafp8$1.30 in·$2.60 out·1M·99.2% upAlibaba Cloudfp8$1.42 in·$2.83 out·1M·100% upSSiliconFlowfp8$1.50 in·$3.13 out·1M·99.4% up
9 more hostsFewer hosts
NNovitafp8$1.60 in·$3.20 out·1M·100% upVVenice$1.65 in·$3.30 out·1M·97.9% upAAtlasCloudfp4$1.68 in·$3.38 out·1M·99.8% upBaidu Qianfanfp8$1.69 in·$3.38 out·1M·99.9% upBBasetenfp4$1.74 in·$3.48 out·1M·99.6% upNNextBitfp8$1.74 in·$3.48 out·1M·97.6% upPParasailfp8$1.74 in·$3.48 out·1M·99% upAzure AI Foundry$1.91 in·$3.83 out·1M·95.5% upCloudflare Workers AIdegraded$1.15 in·$2.55 out·1M·94.2% up
GLM 5.3 FlashX1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Z.aifp8$0.37 in·$1.25 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro is developed by DeepSeek while GLM 5.3 FlashX is developed by Zhipu AI. DeepSeek V4 Pro has a 1.0M token context window vs GLM 5.3 FlashX's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 12 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.3 FlashX each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 12 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.74/M input tokens and GLM 5.3 FlashX costs $0.37/M input tokens. GLM 5.3 FlashX is $1.37/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.3 FlashX across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

DeepSeek V4 Pro logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 FlashX logoSolar Pro 4 logo
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoHy3 logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 FlashX logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 FlashX logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoGLM 5.3 logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 FlashX logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

DeepSeek V4 Pro logoDeepSeek V4.1 Flash logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSame lab
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Same lab
GLM 5.3 FlashX logoGLM 5.3 logo
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GLM 5.3Same lab
GLM 5.3 FlashX logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GLM 5.3 FlashSame lab
GLM 5.3 FlashX logoQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logo
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Same size
GLM 5.3 FlashX logoQwen3 Coder logo
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3 CoderNew provider
GLM 5.3 FlashX logoQwen3 Coder Flash logo
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3 Coder FlashNew provider
GLM 5.3 FlashX logoQwen3 Coder Next logo
GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3 Coder NextSame size

Model pages

DeepSeek V4 Pro logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro58 outputs, specs and price
GLM 5.3 FlashX logo
GLM 5.3 FlashX12 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed