Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek V4 ProvsMuse Glimmer 30B
Updated Aug 2026

DeepSeek V4 ProvsMuse Glimmer 30B

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro at $0.3/M vs $1.74/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V4 Pro and Muse Glimmer 30B compared across 13 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V4 ProMuse Glimmer 30B
Input price$1.74/M tokens$0.3/M tokens
Output price$3.48/M tokens$1.2/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens131K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 13 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

DeepSeek V4 Pro1,849 words
As CEO, my first duty is to the 4 million patients who trust our drug. I will not gamble with their lives or with the integrity of the company. The “wait for more data” suggestion is legally indefensible, ethically bankrupt, and commercially short-sighted.
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B862 words
You have a patient safety issue, not a PR issue. The 6 month regulatory reporting timeline is the formal process, not the ethical or legal obligation to act now. Waiting for more data while patients continue to be exposed is criminal negligence exposure, not risk mitigation.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

DeepSeek V4 Pro1,002 words
1. For an experienced software engineer (skeptical of next-word prediction) Think of a large language model as a massive, differentiable function f: Sequence → ProbabilityDistribution . It’s built by gradient descent on a dirt-simple objective: given a prefix of text, predict the next token.
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B525 words
1. For the experienced software engineer Think of an LLM as a massive, stateless API with no rules, just a huge compressed lookup table learned from data. It learns by training a transformer — essentially a stack of attention layers — as a next-token predictor via gradient descent on trillions of tokens.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

DeepSeek V4 Pro1,006 words
Here’s a gentle, beginner-friendly 1-month plan focused on three foundational pillars: Nutrition, Movement, and Rest & Resilience (sleep + stress). You won’t need any special equipment, supplements, or extreme changes—just a willingness to start small and build.
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B485 words
Here is a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month plan built around 3 foundational pillars for health and longevity. The goal isn't perfection, it's consistency. The 3 Pillars: Move Daily, Eat Whole, Sleep Well Pick 1-2 small habits per pillar to start. Don't try to change everything at once.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

DeepSeek V4 Pro1,917 words
This is a highly detailed, phased, 3-month longevity optimization protocol grounded in the latest science of aging biology, systems medicine, and biohacking. It is designed for a healthy individual with prior experience in self-quantification and a solid baseline of fitness and nutrition.
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B965 words
A 3-month longevity protocol is about stacking evidence-based interventions with tight feedback loops. This is an educational framework for biohacking enthusiasts, not medical advice. Supplements and protocols can interact with medications and health conditions.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

DeepSeek V4 Pro2,259 words
If the transistor had emerged in 1920—a full 27 years earlier—the entire trajectory of the 20th century would have been radically altered. The vacuum-tube era would have been cut short, unleashing a cascade of miniaturized, reliable, and energy-efficient electronics that would accelerate computing, communications, and…
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B1,004 words
A transistor in 1920 does not mean a 1947 transistor. It means a crude point-contact or junction device built with 1920s materials science, metallurgy, and manufacturing. That is still a game-changer.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

DeepSeek V4 Pro1,419 words
This architecture has several critical flaws that would cause data loss, stale states, high latency, and scalability limits. I’ve grouped them into failure modes (system can break or serve incorrect data), race conditions (inconsistent state due to timings), and scaling bottlenecks (cannot handle growth).
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B813 words
This architecture will work for a demo but will break badly under real concurrent use. Here are the critical failure modes, race conditions and bottlenecks: WebSocket fan-out is server-local Failure: Step 3 broadcasts only to clients on THAT server.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Muse Glimmer 30B
Muse Glimmer 30BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, DeepSeek V4 Pro has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro
Input
$1.74
Output
$3.48
Muse Glimmer 30B
Input
$0.30
5.8× cheaper
Output
$1.20
2.9× cheaper

Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper on both: 5.8× input, 2.9× output.

Where to run it

19 hosts, cheapest first

DeepSeek V4 Pro15 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
SStreamLakefp8$0.96 in·$1.91 out·1M·99% upGGMI Cloudfp8$0.96 in·$1.91 out·1M·99.8% upDDigitalOcean$1.04 in·$2.09 out·1M·100% upDDeepInfrafp8$1.30 in·$2.60 out·1M·99.2% upAlibaba Cloudfp8$1.42 in·$2.83 out·1M·100% upSSiliconFlowfp8$1.50 in·$3.13 out·1M·99.4% up
9 more hostsFewer hosts
NNovitafp8$1.60 in·$3.20 out·1M·100% upVVenice$1.65 in·$3.30 out·1M·97.9% upAAtlasCloudfp4$1.68 in·$3.38 out·1M·99.8% upBaidu Qianfanfp8$1.69 in·$3.38 out·1M·99.9% upBBasetenfp4$1.74 in·$3.48 out·1M·99.6% upNNextBitfp8$1.74 in·$3.48 out·1M·97.6% upPParasailfp8$1.74 in·$3.48 out·1M·99% upAzure AI Foundry$1.91 in·$3.83 out·1M·95.5% upCloudflare Workers AIdegraded$1.15 in·$2.55 out·1M·94.2% up
Muse Glimmer 30B4 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
PPhala$0.30 in·$1.10 out·131k·100% upDDeepInfrabf16$0.30 in·$1.20 out·131k·100% upFFireworks$0.35 in·$1.50 out·131k·100% upTTogether$0.35 in·$1.50 out·131k·99.8% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro is developed by DeepSeek while Muse Glimmer 30B is developed by Meta AI. DeepSeek V4 Pro has a 1.0M token context window vs Muse Glimmer 30B's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4 Pro and Muse Glimmer 30B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.74/M input tokens and Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.3/M input tokens. Muse Glimmer 30B is $1.44/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro and Muse Glimmer 30B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

DeepSeek V4 Pro logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoHy3 logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGLM 5.3 logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

DeepSeek V4 Pro logoDeepSeek V4.1 Flash logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSame lab
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Same lab
Muse Glimmer 30B logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Muse Spark 1.3Same lab
Muse Glimmer 30B logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorSame lab
Muse Glimmer 30B logoNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)New provider
Muse Glimmer 30B logoNemotron 3 Ultra logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 UltraNew provider
DeepSeek V4 Pro logoNemotron 3.5 Content Safety logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyNew provider
Muse Glimmer 30B logoNemotron 3.5 Lightning logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 LightningSame size

Model pages

DeepSeek V4 Pro logo
DeepSeek V4 Pro58 outputs, specs and price
Muse Glimmer 30B logo
Muse Glimmer 30B13 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed