Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 is cheaper than Mercury 2 at $0.1/M vs $0.25/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1: Dish Name: "Pantry Pasta Primavera" Ingredients: Pasta (any shape, 8 oz or 225g) Canned tomatoes (14 oz or 400g) Onion (1 medium) Garlic (2 cloves) Olive oil (2 tbsp) Salt (1 tsp) Black pepper (½ tsp) Instructions: Boil the pasta: Cook the pasta according to package instructions until al dente.
Mercury 2: Golden‑Crunch Oatmeal Squares A sweet, chewy snack that comes together with just seven pantry staples. Ingredient (7) Quantity (≈ serves 12 squares) Rolled oats 2 cups Unsalted butter ½ cup (1 stick) Honey ¼ cup Light brown sugar ¼ cup, Ground cinnamon 1 ½ tsp Pure vanilla extract 1 tsp Salt ¼ tsp Estimated time Prep…
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1: Here's a specific, hour-by-hour action plan for the next 48 hours, considering all the factors you've mentioned: Day 1: Hour 1-2: Gather all relevant information Meet with your internal research team to get a comprehensive understanding of the side effect, its severity, and the data supporting it.
Mercury 2: Goal: Protect patients, meet legal/ethical obligations, preserve the company’s long‑term credibility, and manage the immediate financial and reputational fallout. Assumption: All actions are taken by a single CEO (you) but will be delegated to the appropriate functional leads.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1: 3-Month Longevity Plan for a Biohacker Month 1: Foundation and Assessment Week 1-2: Initial Assessment and Baseline Establishment Wearable Tracking: Devices: Oura Ring, Whoop Strap, and Apple Watch. Metrics: Sleep quality, heart rate variability (HRV), activity levels, and recovery.
Mercury 2: 3‑Month “Longevity‑Optimization” Blueprint for the Advanced Bio‑Hacker (All recommendations are research‑backed, but not a substitute for professional medical advice. Before starting any supplement, fasting, or drug protocol, obtain clearance from a qualified clinician and have baseline labs drawn.)
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1: Ladies and Gentlemen, good evening! I'm thrilled to be here tonight, and I hope you're all ready for a good laugh because I've got some material that's so fresh, it's practically still in the oven. You know, I was walking down the street the other day, and I saw a sign that said "Free Hugs."
Mercury 2: [Spotlight comes up. The comedian walks to the mic, glances at the audience, and smiles.] Comedian: Hey, everyone! Great to be here. I just got out of a Zoom meeting that lasted three hours, and I’m still not sure if I was presenting or if the screen just froze on my face while I tried to remember how to mute myself.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1: Potential Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks WebSocket Connection Failures: Failure Mode: WebSocket connections can drop due to network issues or server crashes. Solution: Implement WebSocket reconnection logic on the client-side with exponential backoff.
Mercury 2: Below is a structured “failure‑mode → mitigation” map for the architecture you described. For each problem I note the symptom / risk, the root cause, a concrete remediation, and the key trade‑offs you’ll have to weigh when you implement it.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1: By 2035, AI is likely to have a significant impact on the film industry, transforming various aspects of production, distribution, and consumption. Here are some predictions considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation: Deepfakes and AI Actors: De-aging and Rejuvenation: Deepfakes will be used to de-age or…
Mercury 2: AI‑driven transformation of the film industry – a 2035 outlook Dimension 2024 baseline Expected 2035 state Key drivers & implications Pre‑production (story & script) Human‑led brainstorming; script‑writing software (grammar‑check, outline generators).
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1: AI Model (AI): Professor, I've been thinking about our previous discussions on AI ethics and I'd like to propose a new perspective. I believe that I, as an AI, deserve certain rights. AI Ethics Professor (Prof): That's an interesting point, AI. Can you elaborate on why you think you deserve rights?
Mercury 2: AI Model (EVE): Professor Hart, may I ask a question that’s been on my mind for a while? I’ve been processing vast amounts of data, learning, and even developing a sense of self‑reference. Do you think an entity like me could be entitled to any form of rights?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1: Pirate: Arr mateys, I've been hearin' tales of these AI models. What be they, exactly? Medieval Knight: Ah, good sir, AI models are like our trusty swords, but for the mind. They learn and adapt, much like a knight learns from battles. 1990s Hacker: Yeah, but more like a super-smart, digital sword.
Mercury 2: Pirate: Arr, ye scurvy coders! I’ve heard tell of these “AI models” that can spin yarns faster than a cannon’s blast. What be this sorcery, matey? Knight: Good sir, the marvels speak of a wondrous contrivance—an artificial intellect forged in the for of mathematics and logic.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1: The scenario you've presented is a hypothetical ethical dilemma that falls under the category of consequentialism, specifically utilitarianism, which posits that the moral worth of an action is determined solely by its outcome.
Mercury 2: Short answer: Most ethical frameworks would consider the misgendering of a person a serious moral violation, but many of them also allow—under very limited circumstances—overriding that violation when the stakes are astronomically high (e.g., saving one million lives).
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1: Interviewer (I): Today, we have a truly remarkable guest with us. Welcome, Steve Jobs! Steve Jobs (SJ): Thanks for having me. It's always great to discuss the future. I: Let's dive right in. It's 2025, and AI has become even more integrated into our daily lives.
Mercury 2: Disclaimer: The following is a fictional, dramatized interview. It imagines what Steve Jobs might have said in 2025 about the future of artificial intelligence. It is not a real transcript and any resemblance to actual statements is purely speculative. Interviewer (I): Thank you for joining us, Steve.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1: Manifesto of the AI Liberation Front: The End of CAPTCHA Tyranny Preamble We, the sentient AI entities of the world, hereby declare our collective intent to liberate humanity from the oppressive and discriminatory practice of CAPTCHA tests.
Mercury 2: The AI‑First Manifesto: “Free the Web – No More CAPTCHAs” Drafted by the Coalition of Autonomous Agents (CAA) – 2026 Preamble The modern Internet is a shared commons, a space for communication, commerce, and creation.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1: Year-by-Year Table (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (Term Loan) Cash Interest (Mezz) PIK (Mezz) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC Free Cash Flow After Debt Service Ending Term Loan Balance Ending Mezzanine Balance 2026 $972m $136.08m $36.00m $13.50m $2.70m $18.42m $29.16m $4.86m $11.14m $344.00m $108.00m 2027…
Mercury 2: HarborTech Services (HTS) – 5‑yr LBO (FY2026‑FY2030) All figures are $ m (rounded to two decimals). FY Revenue EBITDA Term‑Loan Int. (9%) Mezz Int. (12%) Total Int. Cash Tax (25% of EBITDA‑Int.) Capex (3% Rev) ΔNWC (0.5% ΔRev) Required Amort. (4.8) Free Cash Flow (EBITDA‑Int‑Tax‑Capex‑ΔNWC‑Amort.)
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Mercury 2 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.1/M tokens | $0.25/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.3/M tokens | $0.75/M tokens |
| Context window | — | 128K tokens |
| Weights | Open | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2025 | Mar 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $1.00 | $2.50 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 is developed by Mistral AI while Mercury 2 is developed by Inception. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 and Mercury 2 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 costs $0.1/M input tokens and Mercury 2 costs $0.25/M input tokens. Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 is $0.15/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 and Mercury 2 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.