Mistral Devstral Small 1.1vsQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 is cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at $0.1/M vs $2/M input tokens.
| Spec | Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.1/M tokens | $2/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.3/M tokens | $6/M tokens |
| Context window | — | 1.0M tokens |
| Released | Jul 2025 | Aug 2026 |
Our Verdict
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 costs 20x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1
Input
$0.10
20× cheaper
Output
$0.30
20× cheaper
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 is cheaper on both — 20× input, 20× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
53%
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B uses 27.8x more headings
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
50%Vocabulary53%
17wSentence Length18w
0.56Hedging0.83
4.3Bold3.1
5.7Lists4.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.05Headings1.34
0.34Transitions0.05
Based on 21 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 vs GLM 4.5New provider
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 vs GLM 4.5 AirNew provider
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 vs GLM 4.6New provider
Mistral Devstral Small 1.1 vs GLM 4.7New provider