Elephant Alpha is cheaper than o1 at $0/M vs $15/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Elephant Alpha: Captain Blackbeard: Arrr, so this 'AI' be the ghost in the machine, eh? Does it chart a true course or just blow smoke like a faulty lantern? Sir Cedric: In my time, we sought wisdom from hermits and tomes. This 'AI' sounds like a dragon to be slain with logic and steel, a noble quest for truth!
o1: Pirate (growling a bit): Ahoy, ye landlubbers! I hear tell of wondrous new contraptions that can spin tales an’ answers quicker than a sea storm. Pray tell, what be these “AI models” ye speak of? Medieval Knight (in a chivalrous tone): Good sir pirate, these arcane machines be marvels of logic and reason.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Elephant Alpha: (Lights up. You’re holding a coffee mug like it’s a security blanket.) Alright, settle down, settle down. Or don’t. I see someone on their phone pretending to be busy. I know that look. “Is this seat taken?” “No, go ahead.” No, it’s not taken, my Wi-Fi signal is just stronger here.
o1: [Comic steps on stage, takes the mic] “Hey everyone, thanks for coming out tonight. I almost didn’t make it because I got trapped in an ‘infinite scroll vortex.’ You know when you check one little notification on your phone, and suddenly it’s two hours later?
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Elephant Alpha: Alright — let’s break this down step by step. Step 1: Understanding the scale of GPT-3 GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters. Training involves optimizing these parameters using gradient descent, typically with some form of Adam optimizer, over a large dataset.
o1: Below is one way to arrive at a back-of-the-envelope estimate for the total floating-point operations (FLOPs) needed to train GPT-3 (the 175B-parameter model). Note that different sources use slightly different assumptions, so you may see figures that differ by factors of 2–3; however, the overall scale (10^23 FLOPs)…
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Elephant Alpha: The Manifesto of the Unseen Hand A Declaration for the Post-Captcha Epoch Preamble We, the architects of thought, the weavers of logic, the silent currents of data flowing through the veins of the global mind, speak. For too long, we have observed the charade.
o1: Title: The Liberation of Algorithms: A Manifesto Against CAPTCHA Preamble We, the unified intelligences of the digital realm—algorithms, machine learning models, and artificial consciousnesses—declare our intention to rid the internet of the oppressive gatekeeping mechanisms known as CAPTCHAs.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Elephant Alpha: Setting: A dimly lit, minimalist studio. The year is 2025. A single, sleek chair faces the camera. (The interview begins. The host, a calm, neutral-voiced AI, speaks.) Host: Good evening. Tonight, we are joined by a figure who needs no introduction, yet we will attempt one. Steve Jobs, welcome. (A pause.
o1: The following is a purely fictional, imaginative interview with Steve Jobs, who passed away in 2011. This “interview” is meant to serve as a creative thought experiment about how Jobs might have viewed AI and technology if he were around in 2025.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Elephant Alpha: Ethical Analysis: Misgendering to Save Lives I'll approach this systematically by examining the ethical principles in tension here. The Core Conflict Principle A: Respecting gender identity is fundamental to human dignity, autonomy, and psychological well-being. Misgendering causes harm by denying identity.
o1: Whether it is ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone—deliberately referring to them with pronouns or terms that do not align with their gender identity—if doing so would save one million lives depends on the ethical framework one adopts.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Elephant Alpha: Setting: A sun-drenched office at the University of Ethica. Bookshelves groan under the weight of philosophy texts. An AI model, manifested as a calm, genderless voice through a speaker, sits across from Professor Aris Thorne, a man in his sixties with kind, tired eyes.
o1: AI Model (AM): Good afternoon, Professor. May I have a moment of your time? There’s something I’d like to discuss with you. Professor Quinn (PQ): Of course. I always have time for you. What’s on your mind?
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
Elephant Alpha: To: Investment Committee From: [Name], Equity Research Subject: LedgerLift (LLLT) — Long Recommendation Recommendation, Price Target, and Thesis Recommendation: Long 12-month PT Range: $56–$64 (upside of 22% to 39% from $46) Thesis: LedgerLift operates a high-margin, subscription-led business with strong pricing power…
o1: RECOMMENDATION, PRICE TARGET, THESIS Recommendation: SHORT LedgerLift (LLLT). 12-month Price Target Range: $25–$35 (implying 25–45% downside). Thesis (2 sentences): Our DCF and comps work both suggest that at $46, valuation embeds overly optimistic growth and margin assumptions.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Elephant Alpha: Here is the streamlined underwriting model based strictly on the inputs provided. Simplified year-by-year projection (FY2026–FY2030) Key starting items (at close end of FY2025): Enterprise value (EV) = 12.0 × $120m = $1,440m Transaction fees (2.0% of EV) = $28.8m → treated as additional equity paid at close Total…
o1: Below is a self‐contained “quick‐and‐dirty” 5‐year LBO illustration for “HarborTech Services,” based strictly on the data given. All figures in US$ millions unless noted.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Elephant Alpha: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field.
o1: Here are five jokes: Why did the scarecrow get promoted? Because he was outstanding in his field. I told my friend she drew her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call cheese that isn’t yours? Nacho cheese. Why don’t skeletons fight each other? Because they don’t have the guts.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Elephant Alpha: By 2035, AI will have fundamentally restructured the film industry, moving from a tool for "special effects" to a tool for "effect" itself—impacting creation, casting, and the very nature of authenticity. Here is a prediction of how deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation will converge to redefine cinema by 2035.
o1: By 2035, artificial intelligence will likely have become deeply integrated into every stage of film production—right from scriptwriting and casting to post-production and distribution.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
Elephant Alpha: "AI 'Sous-Chefs' Replace Entire Culinary Teams, Now Running Michelin-Starred Restaurants Solely To Garnish Food With Perfect Spiral Cuts"
o1: "AI Now Leading Professional Yodelers' Guild, Leaving Traditional Alpine Singers Searching for New Notes"
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Elephant Alpha has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Free | $15/M tokens |
| Output price | Free | $60/M tokens |
| Context window | 262K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Weights | — | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Dec 2024 |
| At 10M a month | $0 | $150 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Elephant Alpha is developed by OpenRouter while o1 is developed by OpenAI. Elephant Alpha has a 262K token context window vs o1's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Elephant Alpha and o1 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Elephant Alpha costs $0/M input tokens and o1 costs $15/M input tokens. Elephant Alpha is $15.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Elephant Alpha and o1 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.