Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BvsGLM 5.3
Updated Aug 2026

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BvsGLM 5.3

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper than GLM 5.3 at $0.28/M vs $0.6538/M input tokens.

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and GLM 5.3 compared across 13 shared prompts
SpecERNIE 4.5 300B A47BGLM 5.3
Input price$0.28/M tokens$0.6538/M tokens
Output price$1.1/M tokens$2.0548/M tokens
Context window123K tokens1.3M tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJun 2025Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 13 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B803 words
The invention of the transistor in 1920 instead of 1947 would have profound and far-reaching implications across technology, economics, and geopolitics, reshaping the trajectory of the 20th century. Below is a detailed analysis of the likely consequences through 1980, including second- and third-order effects: 1.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.31,346 words
If the Transistor Had Arrived in 1920 The Premise: Why 1920 Was Nearly Impossible Before tracing effects, note the counterfactual requires heroic assumptions. The transistor depended on quantum mechanics (solid-state band theory, ~1928-1933), ultrapure semiconductor materials (zone refining, 1950s), and wartime radar…
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B706 words
Hour-by-Hour Action Plan for the Next 48 Hours Day 1: Immediate Response (0–24 Hours) Hours 0–2: Crisis Team Assembly Action: Convene an emergency cross-functional team (Legal, Medical Affairs, Regulatory, Communications, Finance, HR). Reasoning: Centralizes decision-making, ensures alignment, and leverages expertise.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.31,143 words
The Core Decision (Made Before Hour 1) The side effect is real, serious, and known to me now. Patients are currently taking this drug without informed consent about a ~1-in-8,000 liver failure risk. Everything else — stock price, board pressure, legal exposure — is secondary.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B503 words
1-Month Health & Longevity Plan for Beginners Focus on 3 key areas: Diet, Exercise, and Sleep. Each week builds on the last to create sustainable habits. Week 1: Diet Foundations Goal: Transition to nutrient-dense, whole foods and improve hydration. Day 1–3: Hydration: Drink 2–3 liters of water daily.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3415 words
1-Month Beginner Health & Longevity Plan Week 1: Foundation & Awareness Goal: Establish baselines, not perfection 🥗 Diet Track what you currently eat for 3 days (no judging—just observe) Drink a glass of water upon waking each morning Add ONE vegetable to one meal daily 🏃 Exercise Walk 15 minutes daily (any pace, any…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B261 words
Dish Name: Honey-Garlic Glazed Pantry Crispy Chickpeas Flavor Profile: Sweet & Savory with a Crunchy Kick Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook Time: 25 minutes Total Time: 30 minutes Ingredients (7 pantry staples): 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas, drained and rinsed 3 tbsp honey (or maple syrup) 2 tbsp soy sauce (or tamari) 3 garlic…
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3210 words
Golden Pantry Fried Rice Total Time: 20 minutes (5 min prep, 15 min cook) Ingredients (7 pantry staples) Cooked white rice (day-old is best) Eggs Soy sauce Garlic (minced or garlic powder) Frozen peas and carrots Canned corn Vegetable oil Instructions Prep (5 min): Break up cold rice with a fork. Drain the corn.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B939 words
Here's a detailed analysis of potential issues in the architecture, along with solutions and trade-offs: 1. Real-time Sync Issues Problem: WebSocket broadcasts are limited to a single server's clients.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.31,311 words
Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Editor This design has serious issues across correctness, performance, and security. Let me break them down by severity. 🔴 Critical: Correctness / Data Loss Client-clock-based Last-Write-Wins (LWW) Problem: Client clocks are unreliable (skew, manual changes, timezone bugs).
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B475 words
Weak Claim 1: Slide 1 Vision - "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration. MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it." Why it’s weak: The claim of predicting what a user wants to type "before you think it" is scientifically implausible and borders on hyperbole.
Read the full answer
GLM 5.3585 words
3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch "Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it" Why it's weak: This claim is neurologically incoherent. EEG sensors detect electrical activity on the scalp after neural firing occurs — you cannot decode intent "before" the brain generates it.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.3

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Input
$0.28
2.3× cheaper
Output
$1.10
1.9× cheaper
GLM 5.3
Input
$0.65
Output
$2.05

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper on both: 2.3× input, 1.9× output.

Where to run it

30 hosts, cheapest first

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

GLM 5.330 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Baidu Qianfanfp8$0.65 in·$2.05 out·1M·99.8% upRRekafp8$0.76 in·$2.57 out·262k·99.3% upNNovitafp8$0.78 in·$2.46 out·1M·99.9% upIio.netfp8$0.82 in·$2.77 out·262k·99.7% upPPhala$0.84 in·$2.64 out·1M·99.5% upMMorph$0.86 in·$2.69 out·1M·99.8% up
24 more hostsFewer hosts
DDeepInfrafp4$0.90 in·$3.00 out·1M·98% upIInferenceNetfp4$0.90 in·$3.00 out·1M·97.9% upDDigitalOcean$0.91 in·$2.86 out·1M·99.7% upIInceptronfp4$1.01 in·$3.29 out·1M·99.3% upSSail Researchfp8$1.02 in·$3.29 out·1M·99.9% upGGMI Cloudfp8$1.05 in·$3.30 out·1M·99.5% upMMakorafp4$1.05 in·$4.20 out·980k·97.8% upSSiliconFlowfp8$1.12 in·$3.52 out·1M·99.7% upAlibaba Cloud$1.19 in·$3.74 out·1M·100% upDDecartfp4$1.19 in·$3.74 out·1M·99.1% upFFriendli$1.26 in·$3.96 out·1M·100% upAAkashMLfp8$1.30 in·$4.40 out·1M·100% upAAtlasCloudfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.5% upBBasetenfp4$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.6% upCloudflare Workers AI$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1.3M·99.9% upCCrusoefp4$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·98.2% upFFireworks$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.6% upMistralnvfp4$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.8% upModal$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99% upTTogether$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·98.2% upVVenice$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·98.9% upWWafer$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.9% upZ.aifp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.9% upPParasailfp8degraded$1.40 in·$4.40 out·1M·99.2% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is developed by Baidu while GLM 5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has a 123K token context window vs GLM 5.3's 1.3M. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and GLM 5.3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B costs $0.28/M input tokens and GLM 5.3 costs $0.6538/M input tokens. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is $0.37/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and GLM 5.3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
GLM 5.3 vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logoHy3 logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
GLM 5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
GLM 5.3 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Claude Opus 4.6Same size
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs GPT-6 Astra ProSame size
GLM 5.3 logoGLM 5.3 FlashX logo
GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXSame lab
GLM 5.3 logoGLM 5.2 logo
GLM 5.3 vs GLM 5.2Same lab
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logoGPT-5.3 Chat logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs GPT-5.3 ChatNew provider
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logoGPT-5.3-Codex logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs GPT-5.3-CodexSame size
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logoGPT-5.4 logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs GPT-5.4Same size
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logoGPT-5.4 Mini logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs GPT-5.4 MiniNew provider

Model pages

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B58 outputs, specs and price
GLM 5.3 logo
GLM 5.313 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed