ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper than Grok 3 Mini Beta at $0.28/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has the edge: bigger model tier, newer.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.28/M tokens | $0.4/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.1/M tokens | $0.8/M tokens |
| Context window | 123K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Weights | Open | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jun 2025 | Apr 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $2.80 | $4.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is developed by Baidu while Grok 3 Mini Beta is developed by xAI. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has a 123K token context window vs Grok 3 Mini Beta's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Grok 3 Mini Beta each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B costs $0.28/M input tokens and Grok 3 Mini Beta costs $0.4/M input tokens. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is $0.12/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Grok 3 Mini Beta across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.