ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Compare ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B by Baidu against Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct by Moonshot AI, context windows of 123K vs 1.0M, tested across 34 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Input
$0.28
1.1× cheaper
Output
$1.10
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Input
$0.30
Output
$0.60
1.8× cheaper
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B wins input (1.1× cheaper)·Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct wins output (1.8× cheaper)
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
29%
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B uses 93.8x more emoji
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
56%Vocabulary63%
18wSentence Length15w
0.63Hedging0.19
5.3Bold5.2
4.3Lists3.2
0.94Emoji0.00
0.67Headings0.38
0.15Transitions0.05
Based on 27 + 14 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
