ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen3.5 9B
Compare ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B by Baidu against Qwen3.5 9B by Qwen, context windows of 123K vs 262K, tested across 52 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Qwen3.5 9B
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen3.5 9B is 7.3x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Input
$0.28
Output
$1.10
Qwen3.5 9B
Input
$0.10
2.8× cheaper
Output
$0.15
7.3× cheaper
Qwen3.5 9B is cheaper on both — 2.8× input, 7.3× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
42%
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B uses 93.8x more emoji
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Qwen3.5 9B
56%Vocabulary47%
18wSentence Length15w
0.63Hedging0.41
5.3Bold6.9
4.3Lists4.8
0.94Emoji0.00
0.67Headings0.91
0.15Transitions0.12
Based on 27 + 21 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
