Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) by Google AI against Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 11 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B is 3.6x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)
Input
$0.15
1.1× cheaper
Output
$3.50
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Input
$0.16
Output
$0.97
3.6× cheaper
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking) wins input (1.1× cheaper)·Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B wins output (3.6× cheaper)
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
52%
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B uses 31.3x more hedging
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 05-20 (thinking)
Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
70%Vocabulary59%
11wSentence Length15w
0.00Hedging0.31
4.2Bold4.9
7.3Lists2.7
0.00Emoji1.60
0.00Headings0.75
0.00Transitions0.05
Based on 3 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
