Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)vsGPT-4o mini
Updated Apr 2025

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)vsGPT-4o mini

GPT-4o mini is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) at $0.15/M vs $0.175/M input tokens.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) and GPT-4o mini compared across 20 shared prompts
SpecGemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)GPT-4o mini
Input price$0.175/M tokens$0.15/M tokens
Output price$3.5/M tokens$0.6/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens128K tokens
Weights—Closed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2025Jul 2024
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)
GPT-4o mini
GPT-4o miniRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

GPT-4o mini costs 5.8x less per token.

Slight edge

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)
Input
$0.17
Output
$3.50
GPT-4o mini
Input
$0.15
1.2× cheaper
Output
$0.60
5.8× cheaper

GPT-4o mini is cheaper on both: 1.2× input, 5.8× output.

Where to run it

2 hosts

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

GPT-4o mini2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$0.15 in·$0.60 out·128k·99.9% upOpenAI$0.15 in·$0.60 out·128k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
53%

GPT-4o mini uses 103.9x more headings

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking)
GPT-4o mini
53%Vocabulary53%
14wSentence Length19w
0.38Hedging0.82
4.4Bold4.0
4.1Lists3.7
0.00Emoji0.00
0.00Headings1.04
0.24Transitions0.22
Based on 7 + 24 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) logoOx Alpha logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) vs Ox AlphaNew provider
GPT-4o mini logoGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 logo
GPT-4o mini vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Cross-provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) logoMiniMax M3 logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) vs MiniMax M3New provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) logoGPT-4.1 Nano logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) vs GPT-4.1 NanoCross-provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) logoMiniMax M2.5 logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) vs MiniMax M2.5New provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) logoMiniMax M2.7 logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) logoMistral Large logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) vs Mistral LargeNew provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) logoMistral Large 2 logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (thinking) vs Mistral Large 2New provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed