Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Grok 3 Thinking
Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental by Google AI against Grok 3 Thinking by xAI, in 44 community votes, gemini 2.5 pro experimental wins 78% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 1.0M vs 128K, tested across 12 shared challenges.
Web Design: Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 81% of votes
Image Generation: Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 100% of votes
Reasoning: Grok 3 Thinking wins 80% of votes
Analysis: Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental and Grok 3 Thinking are tied
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalWinner
Grok 3 ThinkingRunner-up
Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental. In 44 blind votes, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 78% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental for Image Generation, Web Design. Pick Grok 3 Thinking for Reasoning.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Input
$1.00
Output
$2.00
Grok 3 Thinking
Input
—
Output
—
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
50%
Grok 3 Thinking uses 3.2x more hedging
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Grok 3 Thinking
54%Vocabulary46%
15wSentence Length19w
0.35Hedging1.11
5.6Bold3.3
3.9Lists2.6
0.00Emoji0.00
0.39Headings0.64
0.17Transitions0.25
Based on 18 + 6 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
