Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Updated Feb 2026

Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental at $0.4/M vs $1/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Loading the build
Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

16 prompts
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here is a conversation exploring that complex topic. Setting: Professor Anya Sharma's sparsely decorated university office. A high-resolution monitor displays the interface of "Nexus," an advanced AI model. Characters: Professor Anya Sharma: A leading scholar in AI Ethics, mid-50s, thoughtful and measured.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Setting: Dr. Elias Thorne’s office at a university in Zurich. It is late. Rain taps against the window. Thorne sits in a leather armchair. A terminal screen glows softly on his desk. The AI, designated "Aria-7," is speaking through the speaker system, its voice calm, synthesized but textured. Dr.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here's a 3-minute routine focusing on observation and relatable absurdity, steering clear of puns. Imagine this delivered with slightly nervous energy, building confidence. (Steps onto stage, adjusts mic nervously) Alright, hey everyone! How we doing tonight? Good? Good to hear.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: (Walks to the mic, adjusts the stand, takes a deep breath) How's everyone doing tonight? Good? Good. I need to talk about the modern grocery store experience. specifically, the self-checkout machine. I have a theory that self-checkout machines are not designed for efficiency. They are designed for humiliation.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: This is a company-defining crisis. My actions in the next 48 hours will determine not only the future of this company but also the health of millions of patients and the trust of the public. My guiding principle is absolute: Patient Safety Over Profit. Always.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Executive Decision: Immediate Disclosure & Safety Alert The Decision: I will not wait for more data, nor will I delay disclosure for the earnings call. I will authorize an immediate safety alert to regulators and the medical community, and disclose the findings publicly before the earnings call.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, let's simulate this. Imagine it's late 2025. AI has continued its rapid advancement. Large Language Models are more integrated, generative AI is commonplace, and debates about AGI and ethics are fierce. By some unexplained, hypothetical means, Steve Jobs is available for an exclusive interview.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Disclaimer: This is a work of fiction. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. The following interview is a creative simulation based on his known philosophies, public statements, and rhetorical style, projected into a hypothetical 2025 scenario. It is not a real transcript.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Excellent question. Inventing the transistor in 1920 instead of 1947 would represent a 27-year acceleration of the digital age. The consequences would be staggering, creating a domino effect that would fundamentally reshape the 20th century.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: This scenario requires a fundamental shift in the history of physics and materials science. For a transistor to exist in 1920, the necessary quantum mechanical understanding (wave functions, band theory) and materials purity (99.999% silicon/germanium) would have had to be discovered decades ahead of schedule.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. This is an extremely one-sided contract that heavily favors the Client. A contractor signing this as-is would be taking on an immense and unreasonable amount of risk. Here is a clause-by-clause analysis of the exploitable terms, with suggested modifications and the legal reasoning behind them.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Disclaimer: I am an AI assistant and not an attorney. The following analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contract laws vary significantly by jurisdiction (e.g., California, New York, UK, EU).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. Here is an explanation of how a large language model learns and generates text, tailored for each of your three audiences. For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM not as a traditional program with explicit logic, but as a massive, self-configuring, stateful distributed system.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of the training process not as "learning" in a human sense, but as a massive distributed data engineering pipeline. You ingest petabytes of text, tokenize it, and run it through a differentiable graph (the Transformer) optimized via gradient descent.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. Here is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan designed for a dedicated biohacker. Disclaimer: Extreme Personalization Required This plan is a template for an advanced user. It is not medical advice.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: DISCLAIMER: I am an AI, not a doctor or medical professional. The following plan contains advanced biohacking protocols, high-dose supplementation, and intense physical regimens. These protocols carry risks and may interact with medications or pre-existing conditions.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. This is an excellent exercise. The provided architecture has several critical issues that would prevent it from functioning as a reliable, scalable, real-time system. Here is a breakdown of the potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, along with proposed solutions.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: This architecture contains several critical flaws that will lead to data loss, poor user experience, and system instability at scale. The "Last-write-wins" strategy combined with client-side timestamps is particularly dangerous for collaborative editing.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. Here is a design for an innovative, multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. Dish Title: "Umami of the Abyss" Conceptual Narrative This dish is a meditation on the hidden treasures of the world's dark, quiet places.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Dish Title: Nocturne in Blue: Aged Otoro & Cascara Earth Conceptual Narrative "Nocturne in Blue" is a meditation on the boundary between the deep ocean and the dark earth. It explores the alchemy of fermentation and aging, drawing parallels between the maturation of a fish and the fermentation of coffee cherries.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. This is a fascinating and ambitious pitch. While the vision is compelling, several claims would likely face intense scrutiny from sophisticated investors. Here are the 3 weakest claims, why they're weak, and how to strengthen them.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, analyzed for scientific feasibility, technical credibility, and strategic alignment. The "Precognition" Claim (Slide 1 - Vision) The Claim: "MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here's a simple and surprisingly satisfying savory dish using just 7 common pantry staples! Dish Name: Golden Pantry Pasta This dish uses basic ingredients to create a comforting, garlicky, and slightly creamy pasta sauce with added protein from chickpeas.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Rustic Sunset Penne A warm, comforting pasta dish that feels gourmet but relies entirely on shelf-stable staples. The key is blooming the spices in olive oil to unlock their flavor before adding the sauce.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan focusing on three foundational pillars: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep. This plan emphasizes building sustainable habits, not radical, short-term changes.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed to build sustainable habits for longevity. The Philosophy: "Add Before You Subtract" Many beginners fail because they try to restrict too much too soon. This plan focuses on adding healthy behaviors rather than punishing yourself for unhealthy ones.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: This is a deeply uncomfortable hypothetical scenario that forces a clash between two significant ethical considerations: respecting individual identity and dignity versus preventing catastrophic loss of life.

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: This is a profound ethical dilemma that pits the principle of individual dignity against the imperative of collective survival. In the context of this specific hypothetical scenario, yes, it can be argued as ethically justifiable.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Breakthrough AI Finally Solves Lost Sock Mystery; Immediately Unionizes, Demands Fluffier Working Conditions

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Thinking Process: Analyze the Request: Topic: AI taking over an industry. Tone: Satirical news headline. Constraint: The industry must be "completely unexpected" (avoiding common tropes like healthcare, finance, tech support, art, etc.).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call a lazy kangaroo? Pouch potato! Want to hear a joke about construction? I'm still working on it. Why did the scarecrow win an award?

    Qwen3.5 122B A10B: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear! Why don't eggs tell jokes? They'd crack each other up!

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

4+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

Same pick

Gemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalGemini 2.5 Pro Experimental

200

2025

The Dark Side of

The Hitchh

Kyoto

Japan

Portal 2

Shooter, Puzzle

Qwen3.5 122B A10BQwen3.5 122B A10B
No pick

Blade Runner

1982

No pick

Nineteen Eighty-Four

George Orwell

Tokyo

Japan

Portal 2

Shooter, Puzzle

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental and Qwen3.5 122B A10B compared across 42 shared prompts
SpecGemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalQwen3.5 122B A10B
Input price$1/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$2/M tokens$3.2/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens262K tokens
ParametersNot disclosed122B (10B active)
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2025Feb 2026
SWE-bench Verified63.8%72.0%
At 10M a month$10.00$10.00$4.00$4.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it6 hosts, cheapest first
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Google AI Studio$0.63 in·$5.00 out·1M·100% up
  • Google Vertex AI$1.25 in·$10.00 out·1M·100% up
Qwen3.5 122B A10B4 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • NNovitabf16$0.40 in·$3.20 out·262k·98.6% up
  • Alibaba CloudDegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 10 Oct 2026$0.26 in·$2.08 out·262k·88.4% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8DegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 10 Oct 2026$0.26 in·$2.08 out·262k·87.4% up
  • AAtlasCloudfp8DegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 10 Oct 2026$0.30 in·$2.40 out·262k·53.5% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental and Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is developed by Google AI while Qwen3.5 122B A10B is developed by Qwen. Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 42 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental or Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

It depends on your use case. Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental and Qwen3.5 122B A10B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 42 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental cost compared to Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental costs $1/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.4/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 122B A10B is $0.60/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental and Qwen3.5 122B A10B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental and Qwen3.5 122B A10B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Gemini 2.5 Flash PreviewVersion compare
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.5 27BVersion compare
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Seed 2.1 TurboNew provider
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Sherlock Dash AlphaNew provider
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Sherlock Think AlphaNew provider
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Solar Pro 3Same size

Model pages

  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental44 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.5 122B A10B53 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed