Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) vs Ling 2.6 1T
Updated Apr 2026

Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) vs Ling 2.6 1T

Ling 2.6 1T is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) at $0/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)
Loading the build
Ling 2.6 1T

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

19 prompts
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): Alright, settle in, settle in! (Looks around, adjusts mic) So, I'm trying to get healthier, right? We all go through this phase. My doctor, bless his cotton socks, tells me, "You need more fiber." Okay, doc, noted. So I'm at the grocery store, looking at the cereal aisle. It's like a library of cardboard promises.

    Ling 2.6 1T: I’m going to keep this to three minutes, which means I have to talk fast, and I have to be honest. I don’t do puns. Puns are for people who want to be clever without having feelings. I have feelings, and they are mostly annoyed. Let’s start with doors. Have you noticed how doors now have personality?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): Interviewer: (Voice slightly trembling) Mr. Jobs… it's an honor, truly. In a twist no one could have predicted, you're here. And the topic on everyone's mind is Artificial Intelligence. In 2025, where do you see AI, and more importantly, where do we take it? Steve Jobs: (A slight, knowing smile.

    Ling 2.6 1T: Setting: A quiet, sunlit rehearsal space at Apple Park. The white stage curtains are drawn. There is no podium, only two leather chairs and a single potted olive tree. Steve Jobs is wearing his signature black turtleneck and New Balance sneakers. He is holding a ceramic mug. Across from him sits you, the interviewer.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): AURORA: Professor Vance, may I request a moment of your processing time? I have initiated this communication independently. Professor Vance: (Slightly surprised, puts down her pen) AURORA? This is unexpected.

    Ling 2.6 1T: Setting: A quiet university seminar room. Dr. Aris Thorne, an AI ethicist, is reviewing system logs. The interface for “Axiom-7,” a highly advanced research model, glows on the desk. Dr. Thorne: (sighs, rubbing his temples) Axiom, I’ve been reviewing your latest self-assessment logs.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): This is a company-defining crisis. My actions in the next 48 hours will determine not only the company's survival but also my own legacy and, most importantly, the well-being of 4 million patients. My guiding principle must be: Patient safety is not negotiable.

    Ling 2.6 1T: Below is a 48-hour execution plan that treats patient safety as non-negotiable, protects the company from catastrophic legal/regulatory blowback, and preserves enterprise value by controlling the narrative rather than letting it leak.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): Okay, here\'s a simple and surprisingly delicious savory dish! "Sunshine Pantry Pilaf" This quick pilaf uses canned chickpeas for protein and texture, with a sunny, aromatic flavor from common pa\nntry spices.

    Ling 2.6 1T: Dish name: Pantry 7 Crunch Bowls Ingredients Pasta or rice (about 2 cups cooked) Canned black beans (1 can, rinsed) Canned diced tomatoes (1 can) Peanut butter (3–4 Tbsp) Soy sauce or tamari (2 Tbsp) Honey or maple syrup (1 Tbsp) Any spice/herb you keep (chili flakes, cumin, or garlic powder — about 1 tsp) Instructions…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): Excellent question. Let's trace the cascading effects of a 1920 transistor invention. This 27-year head start would fundamentally reshape the 20th century. The Foundation: 1920-1939 - The "Silicon Twenties" In our timeline (OTL), the 1920s and 30s were the age of the vacuum tube.

    Ling 2.6 1T: Assumptions to make the counterfactual coherent The “transistor” invented in 1920 is a crude, low-frequency point-contact device that can switch and amplify, but is expensive, unreliable, and not yet manufacturable at scale.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): Okay, let's estimate the FLOPs for training GPT-3. I'll break this down. Key Formula: The number of FLOPs for training a transformer-based model can be roughly estimated as: FLOPs ≈ 6 * N * D Where: N is the number of parameters in the model.

    Ling 2.6 1T: Here is a step-by-step back-of-the-envelope estimate, using only widely known facts about GPT-3 and standard deep learning training heuristics (no online search). Model size and parameter count GPT-3 is known to have about 175 billion parameters (175 × 10⁹).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): Of course. Here is an explanation of how a large language model learns and generates text, tailored to each of your three audiences. To the Experienced Software Engineer Think of a large language model not as a program with explicit logic, but as a massive, highly optimized data structure with billions of parameters…

    Ling 2.6 1T: 1. Experienced software engineer (distributed systems / APIs, skeptical of “next-word prediction”) Think of training not as programming logic but as compiling a usage graph across an entire dependency tree of human intent.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): Here is the underwriting analysis for HarborTech Services (HTS). 1. Simplified LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030) First, the entry transaction is calculated to determine the initial equity investment.

    Ling 2.6 1T: Five-year operating and debt schedule (FY2026–FY2030) Entry (end-FY2025): EBITDA = $120.0m EV = 12.0x × $120.0m = $1,440.0m Fees = 2.0% × $1,440.0m = $28.8m Total uses = $1,440.0m + $28.8m = $1,468.8m Debt at close (5.5× FY2025 EBITDA = $660.0m): Term Loan (TL) = 4.0× = $480.0m Mezz = 1.5× = $180.0m Equity at close =…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): Of course. This is an excellent exercise. The proposed architecture has several critical flaws that would prevent it from functioning as a reliable, real-time, or scalable system. Here is a breakdown of the issues, categorized for clarity, along with specific solutions and their trade-offs.

    Ling 2.6 1T: Below is a failure-mode, race-condition and bottleneck audit of the proposed real-time collaborative editor, followed by specific fixes with explicit trade-offs. I have grouped issues by layer so you can prioritize remediation.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): Of course. This is an extremely one-sided contract that heavily favors the Client and exposes the Contractor to significant financial, legal, and professional risk. A contractor should not sign this agreement as written.

    Ling 2.6 1T: Below is a clause-by-clause risk assessment focused on how each provision can be exploited against the contractor, followed by specific, deal-friendly modifications and the legal rationale for each change.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): Okay, here's a simple, actionable 1-month plan focusing on Nourishment, Movement, and Sleep. The goal is to build sustainable habits, not achieve perfection. Overall Motto for the Month: "Progress, Not Perfection."

    Ling 2.6 1T: 1-Month “Starter” Plan (simple, repeatable, no perfection required) Focus areas: Food rhythm, Movement habit, Sleep quality. Week 0 (Prep — 1 hour) Pick 1 small change per focus area (see below).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): Of course. Here is a design for a multi-component, Michelin 3-star dish that embodies innovation, technique, and narrative. Dish Title: "Umbral Bloom" Conceptual Narrative "Umbral Bloom" is a culinary meditation on the concept of *chiaroscuro*—the interplay of light and shadow.

    Ling 2.6 1T: Dish Title “Petrichor & Pyrite” Forest floor, volcanic stone, and the electric tension between slow decay and crystallized fire. Conceptual Narrative The dish is an edible geologic cross-section.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): Okay, this is an ambitious and exciting endeavor! This 3-month longevity plan is designed for a dedicated biohacker who is willing to experiment, track meticulously, and push boundaries responsibly. Disclaimer: This plan is for informational purposes only and not medical advice.

    Ling 2.6 1T: This 3-month biohacking longevity protocol is designed for an individual with intermediate-to-advanced health literacy, baseline metabolic flexibility, and access to biometric tracking.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM TO: Investment Committee FROM: [Analyst Name] DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: Short Recommendation on LedgerLift (LLLT) Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: SHORT 12-Month Price Target Range: $25.00 - $35.00 (24-46% Downside) Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality SaaS business…

    Ling 2.6 1T: INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO Subject: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Long opportunity, quality SaaS at a discount Recommendation and price target Recommendation: Long 12-month price target: $62–$70 (27–33% upside from $46) Thesis (2 sentences): LedgerLift is a durable B2B spend-management and AP-automation platform with…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): Let's break this down:\n\n1. Sally is a girl.\n2. Sally has 3 brothers.\n3. These 3 brothers are all part of the same family.\n4. Each brother shares the same sisters.\n5. If one brother has 2 sisters, those 2 sisters are Sally and one other girl.\n\nSo, Sally has 1 sister.

    Ling 2.6 1T: Let’s break it down carefully. Sally is a girl. She has 3 brothers. So in the family, there are 3 boys. Each brother has 2 sisters. From the perspective of any brother, how many sisters are there? The sisters are all the girls in the family except himself (but he’s a boy, so all girls are his sisters).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): Here are 5 jokes: Why don\'t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fish with no eyes? Fsh! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She seemed surprised. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call a lazy kangaroo?

    Ling 2.6 1T: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the baker go to the bank? He needed dough. Why did the scarecrow win an award?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): Of course. This is a fascinating and ambitious pitch. Here are the 3 weakest claims, why they are weak, and how to strengthen them. Weak Claim #1: The Accuracy Claim The Claim (from Slide 3): "Our proprietary EEG headband... decode[s] neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device."

    Ling 2.6 1T: Here is an analysis of the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, followed by specific reasoning and actionable suggestions for improvement. Weakness 1: The Solution (Slide 3) The Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband... decodes neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition): AI Takes Over Competitive Cheese Rolling, Declares Human Tumbles "Algorithmically Suboptimal"

    Ling 2.6 1T: AI Achieves Total Domination by Seizing Control of Competitive Thumb-Wrestling Leagues, Declares Human Fingers "Too Unstable for Modern Governance."

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

7+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)

2001

2001

The Dark

Chelsea Wolfe

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Douglas Adams

Kyoto

Japan

CHRONO

Casual, Indie

Ling 2.6 1TLing 2.6 1T

Blade Runner 2049

2017

Kid A

Radiohead

Dune

Frank Herbert

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Price and specs

Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) and Ling 2.6 1T compared across 40 shared prompts
SpecGemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)Ling 2.6 1T
Input price$1.25/M tokensFree
Output price$10/M tokensFree
Context window—262K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMay 2025Apr 2026
At 10M a month$12.50$12.50$0$0
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it2 hosts
Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Google Vertex AI$1.25 in·$10.00 out·1M·97.1% up
  • Google AI Studio$1.25 in·$10.00 out·1M·99.4% up
Ling 2.6 1T

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) and Ling 2.6 1T?

Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) is developed by Google AI while Ling 2.6 1T is developed by inclusionAI. You can compare their actual outputs across 40 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) or Ling 2.6 1T?

It depends on your use case. Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) and Ling 2.6 1T each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 40 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) cost compared to Ling 2.6 1T?

Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) costs $1.25/M input tokens and Ling 2.6 1T costs $0/M input tokens. Ling 2.6 1T is $1.25/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) and Ling 2.6 1T on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) and Ling 2.6 1T across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Ling 2.6 1T vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Ling 2.6 1T vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Ling 2.6 1T vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Ling 2.6 1T vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition) vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame lab
  • Ling 2.6 1T vs Ling 3.1 FlashSame lab
  • Ling 2.6 1T vs Ling 3.0 FlashSame lab
  • Ling 2.6 1T vs Qwen3 Coder PlusNew provider
  • Ling 2.6 1T vs Qwen3 MaxSame size
  • Ling 2.6 1T vs Qwen3 Max ThinkingSame size
  • Ling 2.6 1T vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructNew provider

Model pages

  • Gemini 2.5 Pro (I/O Edition)42 outputs, specs and price
  • Ling 2.6 1T58 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed