Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 by Google AI against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 66K, tested across 44 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is 6.7x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input
$1.25
Output
$10.00
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
8.3× cheaper
Output
$1.50
6.7× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper on both — 8.3× input, 6.7× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
51%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 57.7x more emoji
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
51%Vocabulary54%
15wSentence Length16w
0.31Hedging0.31
4.8Bold6.0
4.1Lists4.5
0.00Emoji0.58
0.98Headings0.88
0.05Transitions0.10
Based on 20 + 17 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
