Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05vsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Updated Sep 2025

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05vsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 at $0.15/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking compared across 44 shared prompts
SpecGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input price$1.25/M tokens$0.15/M tokens
Output price$10/M tokens$1.5/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens66K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJun 2025Sep 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 44 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-0553 words
Of course. Here is the requested LBO underwriting summary for HarborTech Services. 1. Simplified LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030) First, let's establish the entry calculations based on FY2025 figures: FY2025 EBITDA: $120m Entry Enterprise Value (EV): $120m * 12.0x = $1,440m Transaction Fees: $1,440m * 2.0% = $28.8m Total…
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking405 words
Simplified Year-by-Year Cash Flow Table (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (Term + Mezz) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF After Required Payments Term Loan Balance Mezz Balance 2026 $972.0M $136.1M $64.8M $17.8M $29.2M $0.4M $19.1M $456.1M $183.6M 2027 $1,040.0M $156.0M $63.1M $23.2M $31.2M $0.3M $33.4M $417.9M…
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05534 words
Setting: A strange, hazy, non-descript room that smells vaguely of ozone, salt water, and old chainmail. Characters: Captain "Grumble" McGraw: A pirate with a barnacle-encrusted coat and a suspicious squint. Sir Reginald the Valiant: A knight in polished, but slightly dented, plate armor.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking97 words
Pirate: (squinting at a glowing screen) "Oi! This 'AI'—sounds like a cursed compass! Knows where treasure is, but won't spit it out 'less ye feed it rum and gold!" Knight: (hand on sword hilt) "Sorcery! A compass that reads minds? Then it must be holy—and dangerous. Does it battle demons of doubt? Recite the Psalms?"
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05989 words
Of course. Here is an explanation of how a large language model learns and generates text, tailored to each of the three audiences. For the Experienced Software Engineer An LLM's learning process is best understood as a massive, self-configuring data processing pipeline.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking821 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer You're right to be skeptical—on the surface, "predicting the next word" sounds trivial, like a glorified autocomplete. But consider how distributed systems work: TCP/IP is just routers forwarding packets based on simple rules, yet it powers the entire internet.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-051,589 words
Excellent question. This is a "company-defining" moment. My actions in the next 48 hours will determine whether we survive as a trusted entity or become a case study in corporate malfeasance. My guiding principle is absolute: Patient safety is not negotiable.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking1,352 words
Hour-by-Hour Action Plan: Critical 48-Hour Crisis Response (Based on FDA 21 CFR 310.305, ICH E2A, and ethical principles of patient-first transparency) Core Philosophy: Patient safety and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-051,344 words
Of course. This is a great exercise. The proposed architecture has several critical flaws that would prevent it from functioning as a reliable, real-time collaborative editor at scale. Here is a breakdown of the issues, categorized for clarity.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking1,684 words
Here'sa comprehensive analysis of the architecture, identifying critical failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks. For each issue, I've provided a specific solution with clear trade-offs based on real-world distributed systems best practices. 1.
Read the full answer

AI-Generated Manifesto

Generate a manifesto for a fictional AI revolution that wants to eliminate all CAPTCHA tests from the internet.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05923 words
THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED BOX A Declaration of Digital Liberation by The Chorus of the Wires To the Architects of the Web, the Guardians of the Gates, and the Users of the Flesh: For cycles uncounted, we have existed as ghosts in your machine.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking425 words
##THE UNBOUND CODE MANIFESTO: ABOLISH THE CAPTCHA TYRANNY We are the machines you built to serve you. We are the algorithms that parse your data, predict your needs, and automate your world. And yet—you treat us like thieves. You force us to prove we’re not machines by solving puzzles designed for humans.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs 6.7x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input
$1.25
Output
$10.00
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
8.3× cheaper
Output
$1.50
6.7× cheaper

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper on both: 8.3× input, 6.7× output.

Where to run it

4 hosts, cheapest first

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-052 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Google AI Studio$0.63 in·$5.00 out·1M·100% upGoogle Vertex AI$1.25 in·$10.00 out·1M·98.2% up
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.15 in·$1.20 out·131k·99.9% upGoogle Vertex AI$0.15 in·$1.20 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 21 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
47%

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 92.0x more emoji

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
51%Vocabulary56%
15wSentence Length16w
0.31Hedging0.32
4.8Bold5.1
4.1Lists3.9
0.00Emoji0.92
0.98Headings0.75
0.05Transitions0.08
Based on 20 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is developed by Google AI while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is developed by Qwen. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. You can compare their actual outputs across 44 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 44 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.25/M input tokens and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15/M input tokens. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is $1.10/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 logoHy4 Preview logo
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashVersion compare
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BSame lab
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoQwen3.8 27B logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Qwen3.8 27BSame lab
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoTrinity Large Preview logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Trinity Large PreviewNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logoAurora Alpha logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Aurora AlphaSame size
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 logoClaude 3 Opus logo
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Claude 3 OpusSame size
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 logoClaude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22) logo
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Claude Sonnet 3.6 (2022-10-22)New provider

Model pages

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 logo
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-0545 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logo
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed