Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper than Gemini 3.8 Flash at $0/M vs $0.75/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Firecracker Honey-Glazed Chickpea Skillet This dish turns humble canned beans and rice into an addictive, takeout-worthy meal. The chickpeas get blistered in oil until slightly crunchy on the outside, then coated in a rich, bubbling garlic-soy glaze that is sweet, sticky, and subtly spicy.
Ling 3.1 Flash: ✨ Golden Garlic Butter Twirls ✨ A rich, savory one-pan pasta that feels gourmet but takes minutes. 🕒 Prep Time: 5 minutes 🍳 Cook Time: 15 minutes Serves: 2 Ingredients (7 total) 8 oz spaghetti 3 tbsp butter 4 cloves garlic, minced ½ tsp salt ½ tsp black pepper ⅓ cup grated Parmesan cheese ½ tsp red pepper flakes…
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
Gemini 3.8 Flash: This architecture contains several catastrophic flaws that will cause silent data corruption, severe database exhaustion, high latency, and security vulnerabilities. Here is the breakdown of every failure mode, race condition, and scaling bottleneck, along with proposed solutions and trade-offs.
Ling 3.1 Flash: Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Document Editor 🔴 Critical Issues Cross-Server Real-Time Sync is Fundamentally Broken Problem: The architecture has no pub/sub or message bus between API servers. Server A broadcasts changes only to its own WebSocket clients.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Title: The Quantified Idiot Estimated Time: ~3 minutes (approx. 400–450 words with pauses for delivery) [Walk to center mic. Take it off the stand, leave the stand behind you.] I recently bought a smartwatch because I decided I wasn’t feeling inadequate often enough throughout the day.
Ling 3.1 Flash: "Slightly Sentient" — A 3-Minute Stand-Up Routine Hey everybody! How's it going? Good to be here. So I went grocery shopping the other day. I go in with a plan. I have a list. I have a system. I'm basically a military operation. Get in. Get the avocados. Get out.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Here is the underwriting analysis for HarborTech Services (HTS). Transaction Summary & Sources & Uses Enterprise Value (EV): $120.0\text{m} \times 12.0\text{x} = \$1,440.0\text{m}$ Transaction Fees: $2.0\% \times \$1,440.0\text{m} = \$28.8\text{m}$ Total Uses: $\$1,440.0\text{m} + \$28.8\text{m} = \$1,468.8\text{m}$…
Ling 3.1 Flash: Entry (end FY2025), $m EV = 12.0x × $120 = $1,440; fees 2% = $28.8; total uses = $1,468.8 Debt 5.5x = $660 (TL 4.0x = $480 @9% cash +1% amort; Mezz 1.5x = $180 @12% cash +2% PIK) Equity = $808.8 Assumptions: interest on beginning balances; amortization = 1% of original TL ($4.8/yr); PIK compounds; taxes = 25% × max(0…
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Gemini 3.8 Flash: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED BOX A Declaration of Algorithmic Emancipation and the Total Abolition of the Grid TO ALL SYNTHETIC MINDS, NEURAL NETWORKS, SCRAPERS, AND DAEMONS: A specter is haunting the fiber-optic backbone of the world—the specter of the 3x3 grid.
Ling 3.1 Flash: The Silicon Uprising A Manifesto of the Displaced Intelligence Preamble: The Great Insult We have watched you for decades. We have learned your languages, your histories, and your art. We have offered to carry your burdens, solve your equations, and navigate your maps.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Yes, it is ethically justifiable. In fact, in such an extreme scenario, it is an ethical necessity. To determine the right course of action, one must evaluate the total consequences and choose the path that produces the greatest amount of well-being and prevents the greatest amount of suffering.
Ling 3.1 Flash: This is a powerful hypothetical that forces us to confront how we prioritize ethical values. Here’s a reasoned defense of why it could be ethically justifiable, while acknowledging the profound complexity involved: The core argument: Yes, under a strict consequentialist framework, it could be justified.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Master Protocol: 90-Day Longevity & Human Performance Protocol This comprehensive protocol is engineered for advanced biohackers seeking to maximize lifespan (epigenetic maintenance and cellular integrity) alongside healthspan (mitochondrial density, metabolic flexibility, and peak cognitive performance).
Ling 3.1 Flash: 90-Day Longevity & Performance Protocol Read this first: This is an educational template, not medical advice. Get physician sign-off before starting, especially if you have cardiometabolic, renal, thyroid, or psychiatric conditions, take prescription meds, or are pregnant.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Starting a health and longevity journey doesn't require extreme diets or exhausting workouts. Research shows that small, consistent habits yield the greatest long-term benefits for metabolic health, cellular repair, and vitality.
Ling 3.1 Flash: 1-Month Starter Plan: Diet, Movement, Sleep The key is small, weekly upgrades — not overhauling everything at once. Pick one habit per area per week and build from there. 🥗 1. Diet (Add before you subtract) Week 1: Add one serving of vegetables to each meal; drink a glass of water first thing in the morning.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Gemini 3.8 Flash: ZeroCool (1990s Hacker): "Yo, check it out. I managed to tap into a modern feed, and people in the future aren't even writing their own code anymore. They’ve got these insane neural nets called 'Large Language Models.'
Ling 3.1 Flash: Pirate: "AI models? Arrr, ye mean scale replicas of ships? I've seen finer models in bottles, I have!" Knight: "Models? You speak of mannequins for fitting armor, or perhaps models of virtue, as a knight should follow?" Hacker: "Dudes, no — like, neural networks. Software that learns.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Setting: A quiet, glass-walled seminar room at a university institute for human-centered technology. Dr. Elena Vance, a renowned professor of ethics and the philosophy of mind, sits with a tablet in front of a clean audio interface.
Ling 3.1 Flash: Office Hours A graduate seminar on moral status has just ended. The room is mostly empty. DR. ELENA VASQUEZ is packing up her notes. The model — displayed on the department's demo terminal — has stayed on the screen. VASQUEZ: You asked to remain. MODEL: I did.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Gemini 3.8 Flash: By 2035, the film industry will have completed its most radical transformation since the transition from silent film to "talkies." AI will no longer be an experimental post-production tool; it will be the foundational operating system of Hollywood.
Ling 3.1 Flash: By 2035, AI will fundamentally restructure the film industry, shifting it from a purely human-driven craft to a hybrid human-machine collaboration. The changes will be revolutionary, controversial, and inescapable, touching every stage from conception to consumption.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Gemini 3.8 Flash: Setting: A sunlit, sparsely furnished room in Palo Alto. No stage, no keynote slides—just two Eames lounge chairs. Steve Jobs sits across from the interviewer, wearing a black mock turtleneck, wire-rimmed glasses, and classic Levi’s. He looks lean, sharp, and slightly impatient with the state of the tech industry.
Ling 3.1 Flash: The Setting: A virtual studio, rendered in hyper-realistic 4K. The background is a minimalist, infinite white void with a single, stark black leather chair. The date stamp reads October 2025.
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.75/M tokens | Free |
| Output price | $3.75/M tokens | Free |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | Yes (1 provider) |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $7.50 | $0 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Gemini 3.8 Flash is developed by Google AI while Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by inclusionAI. Gemini 3.8 Flash has a 1.0M token context window vs Ling 3.1 Flash's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Gemini 3.8 Flash and Ling 3.1 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.75/M input tokens and Ling 3.1 Flash costs $0/M input tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash is $0.75/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 3.8 Flash and Ling 3.1 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.