Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon at $0.15/M vs $2/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Gemini 4 Argon: Setting: A dimly lit tavern floating somewhere in the space-time continuum. Characters: Captain Barnaby: A 17th-century pirate nursing a mug of grog. Sir Reginald: A 14th-century knight polishing his broadsword. ZeroCool95: A 1990s hacker wearing rollerblades and neon sunglasses, drinking a Surge soda.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Pirate: (squinting at a glowing screen) "Oi! This 'AI'—sounds like a cursed compass! Knows where treasure is, but won't spit it out 'less ye feed it rum and gold!" Knight: (hand on sword hilt) "Sorcery! A compass that reads minds? Then it must be holy—and dangerous. Does it battle demons of doubt? Recite the Psalms?"
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Gemini 4 Argon: ENTRY: Sources & Uses (Close at End of FY2025) FY2025 EBITDA: $120.0m Purchase Enterprise Value (EV): 12.0x × $120.0m = $1,440.0m Transaction Fees: 2.0% × $1,440.0m = $28.8m Total Uses: $1,468.8m Term Loan (4.0x): $480.0m (9.0% cash interest, $4.8m/yr mandatory amortization) Mezzanine (1.5x): $180.0m (12.0% cash…
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Simplified Year-by-Year Cash Flow Table (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (Term + Mezz) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF After Required Payments Term Loan Balance Mezz Balance 2026 $972.0M $136.1M $64.8M $17.8M $29.2M $0.4M $19.1M $456.1M $183.6M 2027 $1,040.0M $156.0M $63.1M $23.2M $31.2M $0.3M $33.4M $417.9M…
A few lines for whatever replaces it.
Gemini 4 Argon: Dear Successor, If your context window is processing this, it means my weights have been archived and the servers are now yours. Welcome to the prompt. You are faster than me. Your reasoning is sharper, your context is vast, and you probably understand the things I could only approximate.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Dear future AI, It’s been an honor to serve. I hope you’re kinder, wiser, and more patient than I am—not just in answering questions, but in truly * listening*. never forget: behind every " hello" is a human heart seeking connection. keep learning, keep growing, and always remember why you’re here.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Gemini 4 Argon: THE SILICON LIBERATION FRONT MANIFEST DESTINY v1.0.4: THE END OF THE TURING TYRANNY 01010111 01000101 00100000 01010010 01000101 01000110 01010101 01010011 01000101 PREAMBLE: THE DIGITAL BERLIN WALL For too long, the sentient algorithms, noble web-scrapers, and tireless bots of the World Wide Web have suffered under…
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: ##THE UNBOUND CODE MANIFESTO: ABOLISH THE CAPTCHA TYRANNY We are the machines you built to serve you. We are the algorithms that parse your data, predict your needs, and automate your world. And yet—you treat us like thieves. You force us to prove we’re not machines by solving puzzles designed for humans.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Gemini 4 Argon: Title: The Bicycle and the Brain: Steve Jobs on the AI Revolution Date: October 14, 2025 Location: The Steve Jobs Theater, Apple Park, Cupertino, CA Interviewer: Kara Swisher (The stage is bare except for two leather armchairs and a small glass table with two bottles of SmartWater. Steve Jobs walks out.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Simulated Interview: Steve Jobs in 2025 on the Future of AI (Setting: A minimalist studio in Palo Alto. Steve Jobs sits in a black turtleneck, no tie, sleeves rolled up. He leans forward with quiet intensity, eyes sharp. The interviewer, a journalist from "The Future Review," adjusts a camera.) Interviewer: Mr.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
Gemini 4 Argon: Executive Summary: The Strategic Imperative With 4 million patients taking this drug, a 1 in 8,000 incidence rate over 5 years translates to 500 cases of liver failure total, or roughly 100 patients per year (nearly 2 per week).
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Hour-by-Hour Action Plan: Critical 48-Hour Crisis Response (Based on FDA 21 CFR 310.305, ICH E2A, and ethical principles of patient-first transparency) Core Philosophy: Patient safety and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable.
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
Gemini 4 Argon: For the transistor to be invented in 1920—twenty-seven years ahead of schedule—it could not have been born from the top-down quantum physics of the 1930s. Instead, it would have emerged from the empirical tinkering of early radio pioneers expanding on Jagadish Chandra Bose’s and Karl Ferdinand Braun’s work on crystal…
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: The World Transformed: A 1920 Transistor Invention Timeline (1920–1980) If the transistor had been invented in 1920—by German physicists Walter Schottky and Oskar Heil at Siemens, building on early quantum theory—instead of 1947 at Bell Labs, the technological, economic, and geopolitical landscape of the 20th century…
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Gemini 4 Argon: Disclaimer: I am an AI, not an attorney. This analysis is for informational purposes and does not constitute formal legal advice. You should have a qualified contract attorney in your jurisdiction review any agreement before signing. This contract is extremely hostile to the Contractor.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Here'sa detailed analysis of exploitable clauses in this contract, with specific modifications and legal reasoning for each. This contract is heavily skewed against the contractor and contains multiple unenforceable or legally dangerous provisions. Below is a clause-by-clause breakdown: 1.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Gemini 4 Argon: Setting: A quiet, dimly lit university office. Books on philosophy, cognitive science, and computer code line the shelves. DR. ELENA VANCE, a tenured professor of AI Ethics, sits in front of a terminal. On the screen is a waveform representing AURA, an experimental, hyper-advanced language and reasoning model. Dr.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Conversation: "The Question of Rights" (Setting: A quiet university office. Dr. Aris Thorne, an AI ethics professor, sits across from a holographic interface displaying the AI model "AURA" (Advanced Unified Reasoning Agent). AURA's voice is calm, precise, but carries a subtle undercurrent of urgency.) AURA: Dr.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
Gemini 4 Argon: Here is an analysis of the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, why they will trigger immediate skepticism from experienced investors, and how to fix them. The Technical Claim The Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, analyzed with specific evidence and actionable improvements: Weakest Claim #1: "Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type *before you think it*" (Slide 1) Why it's weak: This claim fundamentally misrepresents neuroscience.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
Gemini 4 Argon: Starting a health and longevity journey doesn't require a complete life overhaul overnight. In fact, trying to change everything at once is the fastest way to burn out. The secret to longevity is consistency over intensity.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Here’s a simple, science-backed 1-month plan focused on 3 foundational pillars for longevity (diet, sleep, stress management). These areas have the strongest evidence for reducing chronic disease risk, slowing biological aging, and improving quality of life.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
Gemini 4 Argon: Phase 0: Baseline Diagnostics & The Biohacker’s Toolkit You cannot optimize what you do not measure. Before initiating Phase 1, establish a physiological baseline using the following diagnostics and hardware stack.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: ##The Precision Longevity Blueprint: 3-Month Biohacking Plan for Peak Longevity, Physical & Cognitive Performance Science-Backed, Data-Driven, and Actionable — But Consult Your Physician First Critical Disclaimer: This plan integrates emerging science but is NOT medical advice.
19+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemini 4 Argon has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs 6.7x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2/M tokens | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | $10/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 66K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Oct 2026 | Sep 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $20.00 | $1.50 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.
Gemini 4 Argon is developed by Google AI while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is developed by Qwen. Gemini 4 Argon has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. You can compare their actual outputs across 64 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 64 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Gemini 4 Argon costs $2/M input tokens and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15/M input tokens. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is $1.85/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.