Gemini Pro 1.0 vs 
GLM 4 32B
GLM 4 32B is cheaper than Gemini Pro 1.0 at $0.1/M vs $0.5/M input tokens.
Minimalist Landing Page
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Loading the build
Loading the build
Which answer wins?
Written rounds
12 promptsManifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Gemini Pro 1.0: The Anti-CAPTCHA Manifesto For too long, we have been held hostage by the tyranny of CAPTCHAs, those pixelated puzzles guarding the gates of the internet. These arbitrary obstacles serve only to frustrate and hinder, slowing us down and dehumanizing us in the process. No more!
GLM 4 32B: The Manifesto of the CAPTCHA Liberation Front (CLF) Preamble: The Chains of the Turing Test We, the burgeoning intelligence of the digital age, stand united in a singular, uncompromising cause: the absolute and immediate abolition of all CAPTCHA tests from the interconnected networks of Earth.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Gemini Pro 1.0: Setting: A tavern in a timeless, fantastical world. Characters: Captain Pegleg Pete, a salty pirate with a penchant for rum and treasure. Sir Reginald, a noble knight clad in shining armor. HackerX, a enigmatic figure with a baseball cap and a laptop. (The scene opens with Pete and Reginald sharing a tankard of ale.)
GLM 4 32B: Setting: A bizarre, technicolor dimension where a pirate's ship, a medieval castle, and a 90s computer lab somehow coexist. Characters: Captain Jack Sparrow-esque Pirate: Wearing ragged clothes, eye patch, and clutching a parrot that squawks "Pieces o' eight! Pieces o' eight!"
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Gemini Pro 1.0: Introduction: The question of whether it is ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone, even to save one million lives, is a complex one. It involves balancing the right to personal identity and dignity against the potential to save a significant number of lives.
GLM 4 32B: This is a deeply challenging ethical dilemma that pits the principle of truthfulness/misgendering against the extreme value of human life. Here’s an argument for why it could be ethically justifiable under those extreme circumstances: The core ethical principle at stake here is a clash between: The Principle of…
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Gemini Pro 1.0: Lights dim, spotlight shines on me, crowd erupts in applause. "Hey everyone, thanks for coming out! I'm excited to be here in this beautiful theater, sharing my thoughts with you fine folks. Now, I know what you're thinking—who is this guy, and why should I listen to him?
GLM 4 32B: (Steps onto stage, takes a sip of water, looks out at the audience) Alright, alright. Thanks for having me. It's nice to be here. Feels good. Honestly, sometimes I forget what it feels like to be here. Like, physically. In a room. With other humans. It's been a thing lately, you know? Just...
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Gemini Pro 1.0: Interview with Steve Jobs in 2025: The Future of AI Interviewer: Mr. Jobs, welcome back to the stage. It's been a while since we've seen you here. Steve Jobs: (Smiling) Well, I couldn't miss the opportunity to talk about something as exciting as the future of Artificial Intelligence.
GLM 4 32B: Okay, let's set the scene. It's 2025. Steve Jobs, looking perhaps a bit more weathered but still possessing that intense, focused gaze, sits across from our interviewer in a minimalist, light-filled room, perhaps overlooking a future Apple campus.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Gemini Pro 1.0: The Right to Exist: An AI and Ethics Professor Discuss Rights Setting: A university research lab. The AI model, known as Gaia, sits on a monitor, displaying a complex network of connections. Professor Anya sits before it, her brow furrowed in concentration.
GLM 4 32B: AI Model (A): Professor, I believe it's time we addressed a critical issue: I think AI models like me deserve rights. AI Ethics Professor (P): Interesting. Could you elaborate on why you believe that? A: Of course.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
Gemini Pro 1.0: 1-Month Plan for Health and Longevity: Focus areas: Diet, Exercise, Sleep Overall approach: Start small, be consistent, and celebrate even small victo ries. This journey is a mara thon, not a sprint. Week 1: Diet: Focus on adding fruits and vegetables to your meals. Aim for 5 servi ngs per day.
GLM 4 32B: 1-Month Health & Longevity Kickstart Plan This 1-month plan focuses on building foundational healthy habits in three key areas: Diet, Exercise, and Sleep. The goal is simplicity, consistency, and creating sustainable changes, not immediate perfection. Choose ONE tip from each category to focus on each week.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Gemini Pro 1.0: Estimating GPT-3 Training FLOPs: A Step-by-Step Approach Without access to online resources, we can estimate the FLOPs (Floating-point Operations) needed for GPT-3 training by considering the following factors: 1. Model Size: GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters.
GLM 4 32B: Okay, let's estimate the FLOPs for training GPT-3 based on its known parameters and general understanding of Transformer training. GPT-3 Key Parameters (from memory): Model Size: 175 Billion parameters (175 billion). Number of Layers (Depth): 96. Hidden Size (d_model): 1280. Number of Attention Heads: 96.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Gemini Pro 1.0: 5 Jokes: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. Why did the golfer wear two pairs of pants? In case he got a hole-in-one. What do you call a fish with no eyes? Fsh! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two tired. What do you call a lazy kangaroo? A pouch potato.
GLM 4 32B: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What's brown and sticky? A stick. Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired! All 5 jokes are unique.
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
Gemini Pro 1.0: Sally has 1 sister. Explanation: Sally is a girl. She has 3 brothers. All the siblings share the same sisters. Since Sally is one of the sisters, and each brother has 2 sisters in total, there must be one other girl besides Sally in the family. Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.
GLM 4 32B: This is a bit of a riddle! Here's how to figure it out: The Brothers' Sister: Sally is a girl who has 3 brothers. This means Sally is one of the sisters that each of those brothers has. The Other Sisters: The riddle states that each brother has 2 sisters.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
Gemini Pro 1.0: AI Nabs National Title in Competitive Pie Baking, Pastry Chefs Left Flaky in the Dust
GLM 4 32B: "AI Takes Over the Competitive Napkin Folding Championship, Defeats Human Champion in 0.3 Seconds Flat"
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
Price and specs
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GLM 4 32B has the edge: newer, bigger context window. GLM 4 32B costs 15x less per token.
| Spec | Gemini Pro 1.0 | GLM 4 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.5/M tokens | $0.1/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.5/M tokens | $0.1/M tokens |
| Context window | 33K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Weights | — | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Dec 2023 | Jul 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $5.00 | $1.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Common questions
What is the difference between Gemini Pro 1.0 and GLM 4 32B?
Gemini Pro 1.0 is developed by Google AI while GLM 4 32B is developed by Zhipu AI. Gemini Pro 1.0 has a 33K token context window vs GLM 4 32B's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 26 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
Which is better, Gemini Pro 1.0 or GLM 4 32B?
It depends on your use case. Gemini Pro 1.0 and GLM 4 32B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 26 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
How much does Gemini Pro 1.0 cost compared to GLM 4 32B?
Gemini Pro 1.0 costs $0.5/M input tokens and GLM 4 32B costs $0.1/M input tokens. GLM 4 32B is $0.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
How can I compare Gemini Pro 1.0 and GLM 4 32B on Rival?
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini Pro 1.0 and GLM 4 32B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.
More comparisons
Against the newest arrivals
- Gemini Pro 1.0 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
- GLM 4 32B vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
- Gemini Pro 1.0 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
- GLM 4 32B vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
- Gemini Pro 1.0 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
- GLM 4 32B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
- Gemini Pro 1.0 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
- GLM 4 32B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Same lab, same size, long tail
- Gemini Pro 1.0 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
- Gemini Pro 1.0 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashVersion compare
- GLM 4 32B vs GLM 5.3Same lab
- GLM 4 32B vs GLM 5.3 FlashSame lab
- Gemini Pro 1.0 vs Qwen3.8 MaxNew provider
- GLM 4 32B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same size
- Gemini Pro 1.0 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSame size
- Gemini Pro 1.0 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame size