Gemma 3 12BvsQwen3.5 Flash
Gemma 3 12B is cheaper than Qwen3.5 Flash at $0.03/M vs $0.1/M input tokens.
| Spec | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.03/M tokens | $0.1/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.03/M tokens | $0.4/M tokens |
| Context window | — | 1.0M tokens |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Feb 2026 |
Our Verdict
Gemma 3 12B
Qwen3.5 FlashRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemma 3 12B has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.
Gemma 3 12B costs 13x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemma 3 12B
Input
$0.03
3.3× cheaper
Output
$0.03
13× cheaper
Qwen3.5 Flash
Input
$0.10
Output
$0.40
Gemma 3 12B is cheaper on both — 3.3× input, 13× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
61%
Qwen3.5 Flash uses 2.5x more emoji
Gemma 3 12B
Qwen3.5 Flash
52%Vocabulary50%
17wSentence Length14w
0.66Hedging0.35
6.2Bold6.9
5.4Lists4.2
0.00Emoji0.03
0.06Headings1.00
0.23Transitions0.15
Based on 23 + 23 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Gemma 3 12B vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Gemma 3 12B vs MiniMax M3New provider
Gemma 3 12B vs GPT-5New provider
Gemma 3 12B vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider
Gemma 3 12B vs Devstral 2 2512New provider
Gemma 3 12B vs Mistral Devstral MediumNew provider
Gemma 3 12B vs Mistral Devstral Small 1.1New provider
Gemma 3 12B vs Dots3-Note PreviewNew provider