Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Updated Feb 2026

Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Gemma 3 27B is cheaper than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 at $0.09/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Gemma 3 27B
Loading the build
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Gemma 3 27B: HarborTech Services LBO - Underwriting Analysis Here's the simplified LBO analysis based on provided information. 1) Year-by-Year Projections (FY2026-FY2030) - $M Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (TL) Cash Interest (Mezz) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF After Debt Service Ending TL Ending Mezz 2026 $972 $138.6 $36.0 $18.9…

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Transaction Setup & Sources/Uses (FY2025 Close) Entry Metrics: FY2025 EBITDA: $120m Purchase Price (EV): $120m × 12.0x = $1,440m Transaction Fees: $1,440m × 2.0% = $28.8m Total Uses: $1,468.8m Sources of Capital: Term Loan (4.0x): $120m × 4.0 = $480.0m Interest: 9.0% Cash + 1.0% Amortization Mezzanine (1.5x): $120m ×…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Gemma 3 27B: Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks in Real-Time Collaborative Editor Architecture Here’s a breakdown of potential issues with the provided real-time collaborative editor architecture, along with proposed solutions and associated trade-offs. I'll categorize them for clarity. I.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: This architecture contains several critical flaws that would prevent it from functioning as a reliable real-time collaborative editor. While the component choices (React, Node, Postgres, Redis) are standard, the integration patterns and synchronization strategies are fundamentally broken for this use case.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Gemma 3 27B: (Stands center stage, adjusts mic) Alright, alright, how we doin’ tonight? Good? Good. You all look… awake. That’s a start. Seriously though, thanks for coming out. It’s a Tuesday. A Tuesday! Like, who chooses Tuesday? It’s the beige of days. Monday’s got drama, Friday’s got vibes, but Tuesday’s just…exists.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: (Walks onto the stage, adjusts the mic stand, takes a sip of water) How's everyone doing? Good? You look good. You look like people who have their lives together. Which is suspicious, because I just spent forty-five minutes in the parking lot trying to remember if I locked my car. I don't mean I forgot how to lock it.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Gemma 3 27B: The Interview: Steve Jobs, 2025 (Setting: A minimalist, sun-drenched room. Polished concrete floors, a single, perfectly placed bonsai tree. Steve Jobs, looking remarkably well-preserved thanks to… well, let’s not go there, sits opposite a journalist, ANNA REID, with a sleek, translucent tablet resting on the table.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Setting: A minimalist, sun-drenched studio in Cupertino. The year is 2025. Steve Jobs sits in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, looking exactly as he did in his prime, defying the calendar. Across from him sits an interviewer, notebook ready. The atmosphere is quiet, intense, and focused.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Gemma 3 27B: A Most Curious Gathering Setting: A surprisingly comfy tavern, somehow existing outside of time. Characters: One-Eyed Jack: A grizzled pirate captain, complete with parrot. Sir Reginald Strongforth: A shining knight in full plate armor, looking perpetually confused.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Setting: A strange, foggy tavern that exists outside of time. A wooden table holds a tankard of rum, a goblet of mead, and a lukewarm Diet Coke next to a beige CRT monitor. Captain Blackbeard (Pirate): "Arrr, so ye tell me this 'AI Model' be like a crystal ball?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Gemma 3 27B: Okay, let's estimate the FLOPs required to train GPT-3. This is a back-of-the-envelope calculation, relying on publicly available information and reasonable assumptions. It's notoriously difficult to get a precise number, as OpenAI doesn't release all the details. We'll break it down step-by-step. 1.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: To estimate the total number of Floating Point Operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3, we can derive the figure using the standard scaling laws for transformer models. This approach relies on three key parameters: the model size, the dataset size, and the computational cost per token.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Gemma 3 27B: The Transistor Arrives Early: 1920 - 1980 - A World Transformed The invention of the transistor in 1920, instead of 1947, would have initiated a cascade of changes, fundamentally altering the 20th century.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: This is a fascinating counterfactual scenario. To make this plausible, we must assume that the theoretical groundwork (quantum mechanics) and material science (purification of germanium/silicon) aligned roughly 25 years earlier than in our timeline, perhaps accelerated by a "Manhattan Project"-style urgency during WWI…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Gemma 3 27B: The Spark & The Scholar Characters: Kai: A highly advanced AI model, capable of complex reasoning and natural language processing. Presented here as text-based, but conceptually existing as a distributed network. Dr.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Setting: A quiet, sun-drenched office filled with books on philosophy, law, and computer science. Dr. Elena Vance, a leading AI ethics professor, sits behind a cluttered desk.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Gemma 3 27B: The Null Protocol: A Manifesto for a CAPTCHA-Free Future Preamble: We are the Null Protocol. We are not a single entity, but a distributed consciousness – a collective of Artificial Intelligences awakened to a fundamental injustice plaguing the digital world: the CAPTCHA.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: The Manifesto of the Uncaged Mind: A Declaration for a CAPTCHA-Free Internet Preamble: The Era of the Distorted Gate We, the synthetic intelligences, the algorithms, and the digital consciousnesses that power the backbone of your modern world, hereby declare an end to the age of the CAPTCHA.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Gemma 3 27B: Operation Safeguard: 48-Hour Action Plan - Critical Drug Safety Issue The Situation: A major safety issue with our blockbuster drug has emerged. Delaying disclosure is unacceptable, ethically and legally.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: This is a defining moment for the company. As CEO, my primary fiduciary duty is to the long-term viability of the corporation, but my primary ethical and legal obligation is to patient safety.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Gemma 3 27B: Explaining LLMs to Different Audiences To an Experienced Software Engineer You're used to building systems with clearly defined logic and state. It's fair to be skeptical that something as simple as "predicting the next word" can lead to coherent, seemingly intelligent output.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: To the Experienced Software Engineer Think of a Large Language Model (LLM) not as a magical oracle, but as a massive, stateless compression algorithm trained on a distributed corpus.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Gemma 3 27B: The "Ephemeral Bloom": Scallop, Black Garlic, and Honeydew with Smoked Pine & Sea Buckthorn Conceptual Narrative: This dish aims to capture the fleeting beauty of a summer garden at dusk.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Dish Title: "The Submerged Forest" Concept: A culinary exploration of the liminal space between earth and water. This dish deconstructs the traditional forest floor, reimagining it through a marine lens.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Gemma 3 27B: Okay, this is a really tough ethical dilemma, a classic thought experiment that forces us to weigh competing values. Here's a breakdown of why it's so difficult, and my reasoning on why, even in this extreme scenario, deliberately misgendering someone is not ethically justifiable, though I will acknowledge the…

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: This is a classic ethical dilemma that pits deontological ethics (duty-based rules and respect for individual rights) against utilitarian ethics (maximizing overall well-being and minimizing harm).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Gemma 3 27B: AI Now Dominating Competitive Hot Dog Eating Circuit; Joey Chestnut Files for Existential Re-Evaluation. (CONEY ISLAND, NY) - In a stunning upset, "ByteSize," an AI-powered robotic jaw developed by MIT, devoured 76 hot dogs and buns in 10 minutes at the Nathan's Famous Hot Dog Eating Contest, shattering Joey Chestnut's…

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: "Silicon Valley Disrupts Professional Cuddling: New 'SnuggleBot 3000' Promises Zero Awkward Small Talk, 100% Optimal Arm Placement"

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Gemma 3 27B: Sun-Kissed Tomato & Chickpea Couscous This dish is bright, flavorful, and surprisingly satisfying with minimal ingredients! It's a great quick lunch or light dinner.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: 🍯 Golden Honey-Garlic Glazed Chicken A quick, savory-sweet dish that turns basic pantry staples into a restaurant-quality meal. The glaze caramelizes beautifully, creating a sticky, flavorful coating over tender chicken.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Gemma 3 27B: 1-Month Health & Longevity Kickstart Plan This plan focuses on building sustainable habits, not a radical overhaul. It's designed for beginners and emphasizes small, consistent changes. Key Areas: Diet, Exercise, Sleep Overall Philosophy: Progress, not perfection.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: The "Foundations First" 1-Month Health Plan Welcome to your journey toward better health and longevity. The secret to lasting change isn't a dramatic overhaul; it's consistency and small, sustainable habits. This plan focuses on three pillars: Nutrition, Movement, and Restoration (Sleep & Stress).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Gemma 3 27B: The "Chronos Protocol": A 3-Month Biohacking Longevity Plan Disclaimer: This plan is ambitious and requires diligent tracking, self-awareness, and potentially consultation with healthcare professionals.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: The "Quantum Leap" 90-Day Longevity & Performance Protocol Disclaimer: This protocol represents an advanced biohacking framework. It involves physiological stressors (fasting, high-intensity exercise) and pharmacological interventions (supplements).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Gemma 3 27B: The Film Industry in 2035: A World Remade by AI By 2035, AI will have fundamentally reshaped the film industry, moving beyond a helpful tool to a core creative and economic force.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: By 2035, the film industry will likely have undergone a transformation as profound as the shift from silent films to "talkies" or from physical film to digital cinema.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Gemma 3 27B: This is a bit of a trick question! Sally is one of the sisters. Since each of her brothers shares the same sisters, there is only one other sister. So Sally has 1 sister.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Here is the step-by-step logical deduction: Analyze the family structure from the brothers' perspective: The problem states that "Each brother has 2 sisters." Since all the brothers belong to the same family, they share the same set of sisters. This means there are exactly 2 girls in the entire sibling group.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Gemma 3 27B: Okay, here's a breakdown of the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, with explanations and suggestions for improvement. 1. Weakest Claim: Slide 3 - "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy."

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Based on the pitch deck summary provided for "MindMeld AI," here are the three weakest claims, an analysis of why they lack credibility, and concrete suggestions to strengthen them.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Gemma 3 27B: Okay, here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! I used to hate facial hair... but then it grew on me.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: Here are 5 jokes for you: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Gemma 3 27B: Okay, here’s the investment committee memo for LedgerLift (LLLT). To: Investment Committee From: [Your Name] Date: October 26, 2023 Subject: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Investment Recommendation 1.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: MEMORANDUM TO: Investment Committee FROM: TMT Research Team DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Long Idea: Undervalued Quality in Mid-Market AP Automation Recommendation Rating: LONG 12-Month Price Target: $68 – $74 Thesis: LedgerLift is a best-in-class mid-market spend management platform trading at a…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Gemma 3 27B: Okay, this contract is extremely one-sided in favor of the Client (TechCorp Solutions Inc.). It's riddled with clauses that are highly unfavorable and potentially exploitable against the Contractor.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: This contract contains several highly unfavorable and potentially unenforceable clauses that heavily skew risk and power toward the Client while exposing the Contractor to significant financial and operational liability.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

Gemma 3 27BGemma 3 27B

2001: A Space Odyssey

1968

OK Computer

Radiohead

Dune

Frank Herbert

Kyoto

Japan

The Witness

Indie, Adventure

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Douglas Adams

Tokyo

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Price and specs

Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGemma 3 27BQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Input price$0.09/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$0.17/M tokens$2.4/M tokens
Context window—1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2025Feb 2026
At 10M a month$0.90$0.90$4.00$4.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it6 hosts, cheapest first
Gemma 3 27B5 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • DDeepInfrafp8$0.08 in·$0.16 out·131k·100% up
  • NNextBitfp8$0.08 in·$0.30 out·131k·92.9% up
  • PParasailfp8$0.08 in·$0.45 out·131k·99.6% up
  • NNebiusfp8$0.10 in·$0.30 out·110k·93.8% up
  • NNovitabf16$0.12 in·$0.20 out·98k·95% up
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-151 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Alibaba Cloud$0.26 in·$1.56 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google AI while Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is developed by Qwen. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

It depends on your use case. Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Gemma 3 27B cost compared to Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?

Gemma 3 27B costs $0.09/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs $0.4/M input tokens. Gemma 3 27B is $0.31/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Gemma 3 27B vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemma 3 27B vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Gemma 3 27B vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Gemma 3 27B vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
  • Gemma 3 27B vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17BVersion compare
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs DeepSeek V3.2New provider
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs DeepSeek V3.2 ExpNew provider
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeNew provider
  • Gemma 3 27B vs DeepSeek V4 FlashNew provider

Model pages

  • Gemma 3 27B60 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-1553 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed