Gemma 3n 2BvsMercury
Gemma 3n 2B is cheaper than Mercury at $0/M vs $10/M input tokens.
| Spec | Gemma 3n 2B | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Free | $10/M tokens |
| Output price | Free | $10/M tokens |
| Context window | 8K tokens | 32K tokens |
| Weights | Open | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2025 | Jun 2025 |
Our Verdict
Mercury
Gemma 3n 2BRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Mercury has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.
Too close to call
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemma 3n 2B
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Mercury
Input
$10.00
Output
$10.00
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
35%
Mercury uses 2.8x more emoji
Gemma 3n 2B
Mercury
49%Vocabulary60%
14wSentence Length31w
0.46Hedging0.78
6.5Bold4.1
6.1Lists2.8
0.00Emoji0.03
0.19Headings0.88
0.23Transitions0.06
Based on 14 + 26 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Gemma 3n 2B vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Gemma 3n 2B vs GPT-4.1 NanoNew provider
Gemma 3n 2B vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
Gemma 3n 2B vs MiniMax M3New provider
Gemma 3n 2B vs GLM 5 TurboNew provider
Gemma 3n 2B vs GLM 5.1New provider
Gemma 3n 2B vs GLM 5.2New provider
Gemma 3n 2B vs Golden Gate ClaudeNew provider