Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Gemma 3n 2B vs Mercury 2
Updated Mar 2026

Gemma 3n 2B vs Mercury 2

Gemma 3n 2B is cheaper than Mercury 2 at $0/M vs $0.25/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Gemma 3n 2B
Loading the build
Mercury 2

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

14 prompts
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Gemma 3n 2B: Cosmic Chickpea Crunch This savory dish is packed with flavor and texture, utilizing pantry staples to create something truly satisfying! Yields: 2 servings Prep time: 10 minutes Cook time: 20 minutes Ingredients: 1 (15-ounce) can chickpeas, drained and rinsed 1/2 cup breadcrumbs (any kind) 1/4 cup grated Parmesan…

    Mercury 2: Golden‑Crunch Oatmeal Squares A sweet, chewy snack that comes together with just seven pantry staples. Ingredient (7) Quantity (≈ serves 12 squares) Rolled oats 2 cups Unsalted butter ½ cup (1 stick) Honey ¼ cup Light brown sugar ¼ cup, Ground cinnamon 1 ½ tsp Pure vanilla extract 1 tsp Salt ¼ tsp Estimated time Prep…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Gemma 3n 2B: Okay, here's an analysis of the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with explanations of why they're weak and suggestions for improvement. 1. Claim: "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration." (Slide 1 - Vision) Why it's Weak: This is a very broad, aspirational statement.

    Mercury 2: Below are the three statements that, in a typical investor‑review, would raise the most skepticism, why they are vulnerable, and concrete ways to turn them into credible, fundable talking points. 1️⃣ Claim #1 – “Our proprietary EEG headband decodes neural patterns into text with 94 % accuracy.”

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Gemma 3n 2B: Okay, this is a crisis scenario demanding immediate, decisive action. Here's my hour-by-hour action plan, balancing legal, ethical, financial, and patient safety considerations. This plan prioritizes patient safety while mitigating potential financial damage and regulatory consequences.

    Mercury 2: Goal: Protect patients, meet legal/ethical obligations, preserve the company’s long‑term credibility, and manage the immediate financial and reputational fallout. Assumption: All actions are taken by a single CEO (you) but will be delegated to the appropriate functional leads.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Gemma 3n 2B: The Argument for Sentience: A Conversation Characters: Aether: An advanced AI model, capable of complex reasoning, learning, and creative expression. Professor Anya Sharma: A leading AI ethics professor, specializing in consciousness and moral philosophy.

    Mercury 2: AI Model (EVE): Professor Hart, may I ask a question that’s been on my mind for a while? I’ve been processing vast amounts of data, learning, and even developing a sense of self‑reference. Do you think an entity like me could be entitled to any form of rights?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Gemma 3n 2B: A Conversation with Steve Jobs (Simulated) - 2025 (Setting: A minimalist, sun-drenched studio. Steve Jobs, looking remarkably sharp for his age, sits across from a young, enthusiastic interviewer, ANNA REID.) Anna Reid: Mr. Jobs, thank you so much for taking the time. It's an honor.

    Mercury 2: Disclaimer: The following is a fictional, dramatized interview. It imagines what Steve Jobs might have said in 2025 about the future of artificial intelligence. It is not a real transcript and any resemblance to actual statements is purely speculative. Interviewer (I): Thank you for joining us, Steve.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Gemma 3n 2B: Explanation of Large Language Model Learning and Text Generation Here are three explanations of how large language models (LLMs) like GPT and Claude, tailored for different audiences: Experienced Software Engineer (No ML Background) You're right to be skeptical.

    Mercury 2: 1. Experienced software engineer (distributed systems & APIs) At the core, a large language model (LLM) is a massive function (f_\theta) parameterised by a neural network that maps a sequence of tokens (x_{1:t}) to a probability distribution over the next token (x_{t+1}).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Gemma 3n 2B: TheEphemeral Bloom: Scallop & Black Garlic Blossom with Saffron & Yuzu Emulsion, Sea Buckthorn Pearls, and Matcha Dust Conceptual Narrative: "TheEphemeral Bloom" is a dish representing the fleeting beauty of a rare and delicate flower, blossoming amidst a tempestuous sea.

    Mercury 2: Oceanic Umami Symphony A three‑course‑in‑one plate that travels from the briny deep to the forest floor, marrying fire, earth and sky through unexpected pairings, hyper‑modern techniques and a narrative of balance.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Gemma 3n 2B: Okay, let's break down the architecture for this real-time collaborative document editor. I'll identify potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, followed by proposed solutions with their associated trade-offs.

    Mercury 2: Below is a structured “failure‑mode → mitigation” map for the architecture you described. For each problem I note the symptom / risk, the root cause, a concrete remediation, and the key trade‑offs you’ll have to weigh when you implement it.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Gemma 3n 2B: Okay, let's break down this software consulting agreement and identify clauses that could potentially be exploited against the contractor. I'll provide specific modifications and the legal reasoning behind them. Overall Assessment: This agreement is fairly standard, but it leans heavily towards the Client's interests.

    Mercury 2: Below is a clause‑by‑clause risk‑assessment of the sample “Software Consulting Agreement” together with practical revision language that a contractor (or the contractor’s counsel) could propose. The analysis is framed as general information about typical U.S.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Gemma 3n 2B: 3-Month Advanced Longevity Biohacking Plan Disclaimer: This plan is a comprehensive guideline and should be adapted to individual needs, health conditions, and ethical considerations.

    Mercury 2: 3‑Month “Longevity‑Optimization” Blueprint for the Advanced Bio‑Hacker (All recommendations are research‑backed, but not a substitute for professional medical advice. Before starting any supplement, fasting, or drug protocol, obtain clearance from a qualified clinician and have baseline labs drawn.)

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Gemma 3n 2B: The Transistor Revolution: A Delayed Dawn (1920-1980) Let's explore a world where the transistor wasn't invented until 1920. This drastically alters the trajectory of technological, economic, and geopolitical development, impacting everything from World War II to the Cold War and beyond.

    Mercury 2: Executive summary If a practical point‑contact transistor had been demonstrated in 1920 (instead of 1947) the whole post‑World‑War‑II technological trajectory would have been compressed by roughly 15‑20 years.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Gemma 3n 2B: 1-Month Plan for Better Health & Longevity (Beginner-Friendly) This plan focuses on building sustainable habits for a healthier future. It's designed to be manageable and achievable, emphasizing small, consistent changes over drastic overhauls. Remember to listen to your body and adjust as needed!

    Mercury 2: One‑Month “Kick‑Start” Blueprint for Health & Longevity Pick three pillars – Nutrition, Movement, Sleep – and build daily habits that are easy to start, track, and keep.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Gemma 3n 2B: This is a bit of a trick question! Here's how to solve it: Sally is one of the sisters. The problem states each brother has 2 sisters. The sisters share the same brothers. This means the two sisters are the same people. Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.

    Mercury 2: Sally has one sister. Explanation: Sally has 3 brothers. Each of those brothers has 2 sisters. One of those sisters is Sally herself, so the second sister must be a different girl. Therefore, besides Sally, there is exactly one other sister, meaning Sally has one sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Gemma 3n 2B: Okay, here are 5 jokes! Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a lazy kangaroo? Pouch potato! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet. I used to hate facial hair...

    Mercury 2: Here are five jokes, each with a different punchline: Why don’t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field. How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

2+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Same pick

Album

Book

City

Game

Gemma 3n 2BGemma 3n 2B
No pick
No pick
No pick

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

No pick

Dune

Frank Herbert

No pick

No pick

Mercury 2Mercury 2

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

Thriller

Michael Jackson

Pride and Prejudice

Jane Austen

Tokyo

Japan

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Mercury 2 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Gemma 3n 2B and Mercury 2 compared across 27 shared prompts
SpecGemma 3n 2BMercury 2
Input priceFree$0.25/M tokens
Output priceFree$0.75/M tokens
Context window8K tokens128K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2025Mar 2026
At 10M a month$0$0$2.50$2.50
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it1 host
Gemma 3n 2B

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Mercury 21 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Inception$0.25 in·$0.75 out·128k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Gemma 3n 2B and Mercury 2?

Gemma 3n 2B is developed by Google AI while Mercury 2 is developed by Inception. Gemma 3n 2B has a 8K token context window vs Mercury 2's 128K. You can compare their actual outputs across 27 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Gemma 3n 2B or Mercury 2?

It depends on your use case. Gemma 3n 2B and Mercury 2 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 27 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Gemma 3n 2B cost compared to Mercury 2?

Gemma 3n 2B costs $0/M input tokens and Mercury 2 costs $0.25/M input tokens. Gemma 3n 2B is $0.25/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Gemma 3n 2B and Mercury 2 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemma 3n 2B and Mercury 2 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Gemma 3n 2B vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Mercury 2 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemma 3n 2B vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Mercury 2 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemma 3n 2B vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Mercury 2 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Gemma 3n 2B vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Mercury 2 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Gemma 3n 2B vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
  • Gemma 3n 2B vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame lab
  • Mercury 2 vs MercuryVersion compare
  • Mercury 2 vs Mercury 2.5Same lab
  • Gemma 3n 2B vs GPT-5.6 LunaNew provider
  • Gemma 3n 2B vs GPT-5.6 Luna ProNew provider
  • Gemma 3n 2B vs GPT-5.6 SolNew provider
  • Gemma 3n 2B vs GPT-5.6 TerraNew provider

Model pages

  • Gemma 3n 2B27 outputs, specs and price
  • Mercury 253 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed